Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09LISBON534, FRAUD SUMMARY - PORTUGAL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09LISBON534.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09LISBON534 2009-10-09 11:54 2011-08-26 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Lisbon
VZCZCXRO6725
RR RUEHPD
DE RUEHLI #0534/01 2821154
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 091154Z OCT 09
FM AMEMBASSY LISBON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7910
RUEHPD/AMCONSUL PONTA DELGADA 0630
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 LISBON 000534 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR CA/FPP 
DHS FOR CIS/FDNS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: CMGT KFRD ASEC CVIS CPAS PO
SUBJECT: FRAUD SUMMARY - PORTUGAL 
 
REF: (A) LISBON 000400 (B) LISBON 000239 
a. COUNTRY CONDITIONS:  Portugal has been a member of the European 
Union since 1986 and a member of the U.S. Visa Waiver Program (VWP) 
since 1999.  The country has a relatively homogeneous population of 
10.7 million and one of the lowest crime rates in Western Europe. 
Although Portugal had for centuries been a country of net 
emigration, during the past twenty years emigration has slowed to a 
trickle and the country instead has become a destination for 
increasing numbers of immigrants from outside the European Union. 
Traditionally boasting one of the lowest crime rates in Western 
Europe, 2008 statistics show an increase in every significant 
category across the criminal index.  This trend has held steady 
through both quarters of 2009.  General crime increased by more than 
seven percent while violent crime increased 10 percent with crime in 
Lisbon alone accounting for 40 percent of the increase.  Some 
members of law enforcement attribute this to increased unemployment, 
specifically among immigrants.  Others cite the economic crisis in 
general, and some believe that youth gangs in the larger cities are 
simply becoming more brazen. 
Approximately 100,000 foreign nationals are estimated to be residing 
in Portugal illegally, in addition to the approximate 500,000 legal 
residents.  Immigration and visa- related fraud detected in Portugal 
usually takes the form of attempts by foreign nationals--most 
notably, persons from Brazil, Eastern European countries and former 
Portuguese colonies in Africa--to enter Portugal surreptitiously or 
to move from Portugal to more prosperous countries, both inside and 
outside of the European Union.  Recent statistics from the 
Portuguese Immigration Service (Servico de Estrangeiros e 
Frontieras) [SEF]) show that Brazilians, who do not need a visa to 
enter Portugal, represent 71.5 percent of illegal residents in the 
country.  In terms of fraudulent documents, SEF's detection rates 
were highest for nationals of Colombia, Senegal, Guinea Bissau, and 
Venezuela, in that order. 
b. NIV FRAUD:  Portuguese nationals with machine readable passports 
do not require visas for tourist or business travel to the U.S., as 
they may travel under the VWP. Embassy Lisbon's average refusal rate 
across all nationalities was 14.67 percent in FY 2009 and 13.20 
percent since the last fraud cable. Consulate Ponta Delgada's 
average refusal rate across all nationalities was 12.54 percent for 
FY 2009 and 14.29 percent since the last reporting period. 
Lisbon receives from DHS approximately 15 I-275's per month and 
Ponta Delgada receives about three.  Lisbon encounters approximately 
three applicants per week who have been denied VWP entry by CBP 
while Ponta Delgada sees about three per month.  It is not lost on 
either Post that these numbers strongly correlate with the number of 
'turn arounds' at the borders.  Of these applicants, we refuse about 
two-thirds 214(b) after having confirmed suspicions of living and/or 
working in the U.S. courtesy of the VWP.  Lisbon and Ponta Delgada 
see another 20 or so applicants a month who were not denied entry, 
but who were advised upon departure to seek a visa for future travel 
due to suspect travel patterns.  Of these applicants, both Posts 
estimate that 50 percent are refused 214 (b) with elderly Portuguese 
nationals veritably living with children in the US making up the 
bulk of the intending immigrants. 
Post has detected no crew-related fraud since the implementation of 
a fraud prevention process by which we confirm the employment of all 
crew members directly with their employers. The process includes a 
pre-screening of all shipping or transportation companies requesting 
visas on behalf of their employees.  Post maintains exemplars of all 
letterhead and company-approved signatures against which the 
confirmations are compared. 
c. IV FRAUD:  IV fraud is generally low in Portugal and demand for 
immigrant visas is not great.  Post sees quite a few third country 
nationals, however, primarily applicants from the former Portuguese 
colonies but increasingly also from Eastern Europe and from other 
countries requiring clearance procedures.  These cases require extra 
vigilance in terms of the validity of documents with which we have 
little or no familiarity.  When in doubt, we often use CCD resources 
or reach out to colleagues in relevant Posts.  In some of the 
family-based immigration claims, parents left behind small children 
to be raised by relatives.  This makes for scant evidence in terms 
of photos, letters, or even memories to assist in determining the 
bona fides of the relationship. 
d. DV FRAUD:  Post has not uncovered any fraud attempts related to 
DV applications during this reporting period. 
e. ACS AND PASSPORT FRAUD:  Counterfeit U.S. passports are detected 
in Portugal on occasion.  No new incidents of ACS or passport fraud 
were detected in the first half of 2009. 
f. ADOPTION FRAUD:  Post processes very few adoption cases and no 
adoption-related fraud has been detected this reporting period. 
g. USE OF DNA: In this quarter, Post has had three cases such as 
those described under section c, in which the suggestion of DNA 
testing seemed the best vehicle via which to draw a conclusion. 
However the applicants did not decide how to proceed before the 
release of STATE 097431. The new measures juxtaposed with the 
relative infrequency of this issue here have raised a cost/benefit 
question not yet fully addressed. 
h. ASYLUM AND OTHER DHS BENEFITS FRAUD:  Post processes only one or 
two asylum cases per year, reflecting the small number of persons 
 
LISBON 00000534  002 OF 003 
 
 
who attempt to claim asylum in Portugal (fewer than 100 per year.) 
No new asylum cases were received during this period. 
i. ALIEN SMUGGLING: Post is the official NIV application point for 
Guinea Bissau and also often sees diplomatic visa requests from 
other nations where document integrity is not reliable.  Although 
these cases occasionally take more time and attention, no 6E cases 
have been confirmed this quarter. 
SEF has recently increased efforts to uncover human smuggling rings 
and punish perpetrators via increasingly-stiff penalties.  The GOP 
cooperates with other European Union countries in these pursuits. 
REFTEL A details how local authorities recently dismantled a 
Ukrainian fraud ring called "A Central." The group's main activity 
was the smuggling of people from Eastern European countries, mainly 
Ukraine, into Portugal, Spain and Italy. The ring produced 
counterfeit documentation, provided false U.S. and international 
driver's licenses and issued false labor contracts in the course of 
their illicit activities.  REFTEL A generated interest from the 
Department of Justice, which requested more information in hopes of 
catching up with facilitators in the U.S. 
 
Just a few weeks later, GOP uncovered and prosecuted a Moldovan 
fraud ring comprised of 13 Moldovans and one Portuguese citizen. 
The resultant prison sentences ranged from five to 23 years. 
j. DS CRIMINAL FRAUD INVESTIGATIONS: There are no current fraud 
investigations. 
k. HOST COUNTRY PASSPORT, IDENTITY DOCUMENTS, AND CIVIL REGISTRY: 
Portugal has made great strides in upgrading the security of its 
identity documents over the past ten years.  Portuguese passports 
have had digital photos and machine-readable passports since January 
1, 2001, leaving only another year of current passports susceptible 
to photo-subbing. On August 26, 2006, the GOP began issuing 
electronic chip passports. 
Per REFTEL B, the GOP and the Australians have reported imposters 
boarding flights with valid Portuguese passports.  There have also 
been reports of issues with altered Portuguese passports. 
Additionally, mala fide travelers have presented altered Portuguese 
residency cards although the GOP's upgrade in 2005 to plastic cards 
with flush photos rather than paper cards with pasted photos has 
greatly increased integrity of that document. 
 
l. COOPERATION WITH HOST GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES:  Cooperation with 
host government authorities remains excellent. The Government of 
Portugal shares U.S. concerns about document fraud and is mindful of 
the need to remain vigilant in this area, both to protect its 
citizens and to preserve Portugal's highly-valued participation in 
the Visa Waiver Program. 
In June 2009 Secretary of State Clinton and the Portuguese Minister 
of Foreign Affairs exchanged the instruments of ratification 
concerning the U.S-Portugal Agreements on Extradition and Mutual 
Legal Assistance.  The bilateral instruments aim at implementing the 
2003 U.S.-EU Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance Agreements. 
 
The Agreement on Extradition modernizes the 1908 Extradition treaty 
between the U.S. and Portugal.  Among the most important features is 
a provision replacing outdated lists of extraditable offenses with 
the dual criminality approach.  It also allows extradition for a 
broader range of offenses and for newer ones.  The Agreement 
contains a series of significant improvements to expedite the 
extradition process. 
 
Prior to these advances, no bilateral law enforcement treaty existed 
between the United States and Portugal in the area of mutual legal 
assistance.  The current mutual legal assistance instrument reflects 
the high level of bilateral cooperation here and exemplifies 
on-going efforts to meet the obligations arising from the U.S.-EU 
Agreement. 
In June 2009, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano visited Lisbon to meet 
with the Portuguese Foreign, Interior and Justice Ministers.  After 
the roundtable meeting, Sec. Naplitano and the Interior and Justice 
ministers signed a bilateral agreement on Preventing and Combating 
Crime (PCC) that will allow the exchange of information on 
biometrics, criminal history records, and terrorism.  The USG 
initially proposed this agreement (under the name "Preventing and 
Combating Serious Crime") to the GOP in 2008 as part of enhanced 
security arrangements mandated by the 9/11 Act for VWP countries. 
m. AREAS OF PARTICULAR CONCERN:  As noted in REFTEL B, post 
occasionally sees employment-based IVs seemingly being used in lieu 
of a family-based immigration option. Typically, a cousin in the 
United States will over-inflate the size and solvency of the 
US-based business.  Additionally, the applicants in these cases do 
not tend to possess training or schooling logical to the intended 
"position."  While not prevalent enough to be legitimately called a 
trend, Post did return to DHS during this reporting period one such 
petition with a recommendation for revocation.  Post is grateful to 
KCC for pro-actively researching and highlighting inconsistencies in 
the Petitioner's claims.  Post has noticed a particular immigration 
attorney's name attached to cases of this ilk and is employing Watch 
Phrase and other Department and CCD resources in search of common 
threads.  We will report back if something solidifies. 
Something that is not strictly fraud perpetrated against Post but 
 
LISBON 00000534  003 OF 003 
 
 
which merits mention due to frequency is the number of scams against 
ESTA registrants.  Internet sites pop up bearing striking 
resemblances to the legitimate USG site.  The sites collect the 
unwitting applicant's personal and financial information.  In the 
best case scenario, the entrepreneurial owners of the site properly 
register applicants with ESTA, and extract a one-time fee.  On the 
other end of the scale is full-fledged identity theft.  Post tries 
to report and shut down such sites, but it is akin to playing 
whack-a-mole.  Post is proud to note that 100 percent of email 
inquiries receive a personal response within two working days.  We 
can, therefore, sometimes stop this problem before it starts. 
Additionally, since the official ESTA launch, Post has placed ads, 
done outreach, and posted warnings on our web site in hopes of 
reinforcing to the public that such sites are neither legitimate nor 
necessary. 
n. STAFFING AND TRAINING PATTERN:  Laura Chamberlin is Embassy 
Lisbon's Visa Unit Chief and Fraud Prevention Manager and will soon 
be Visas Viper Program liaison.  She completed the Advanced 
Consular, Advanced Namechecking, and Fraud Prevention Manager 
courses in Spring 2009.  Margarida Gomes is Embassy Lisbon's Legal 
Advisor and has completed various anti-fraud training courses, 
including the PC-542 "FSN Fraud Prevention Workshop" in November of 
ΒΆ2004.  Jeanette Rebert is Consulate Ponta Delgada's Consular Section 
Chief (both Visa and ACS units), FPM and Visa Viper Program liaison. 
She completed the Advanced Consular and Advanced Namechecking 
courses in March 2006 
BALLARD