Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09USNATO179, CORRECTED: NATO SECRETARY GENERAL STATEMENT ON

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09USNATO179.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09USNATO179 2009-05-08 14:39 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED Mission USNATO
VZCZCXRO9861
PP RUEHIK RUEHPOD RUEHYG
DE RUEHNO #0179 1281439
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 081439Z MAY 09 ZDK
FM USMISSION USNATO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2943
INFO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 6361
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0670
RUEHNO/USDELMC BRUSSELS BE PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JCS WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUFGSHZ/SHAPE BE  PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/WHITE HOUSE NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
UNCLAS USNATO 000179 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EUR/RPM 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: NATO PREL OFDP OPRC CA RS
SUBJECT: CORRECTED: NATO SECRETARY GENERAL STATEMENT ON 
RUSSIAN EXPULSION OF TWO NATO DIPLOMATS 
 
REF: USNATO 178 
 
1. (U) On May 6 NATO Secretary General de Hoop Scheffer 
released the following statement regarding Russian revocation 
of diplomatic status of two Canadian NATO diplomats in the 
NATO Information Office in Moscow: 
 
BEGIN TEXT: 
 
The Canadian Ambassador in Moscow, who provides the 
diplomatic status to the Director and Deputy Director of the 
NATO Information Office in Moscow, was called today to the 
Russian Foreign Ministry and informed that the diplomatic 
status of the Director and Deputy Director has been revoked. 
 
Since that status is part of the NATO Russia Memorandum of 
Understanding which establishes the Information Office, the 
action effectively ends the mission of these two NATO 
officials in Moscow and, since they are the only 
International Staff of the Office, the work of the Office 
will continue but will be significantly affected. 
 
The NATO Information Office in Moscow contributes to the 
development of greater public understanding within Russia on 
Russia-NATO relations, and serves as the focal point for 
disseminating information within Russia on NATO's role and 
activities. 
 
As was agreed at the recent Strasbourg-Kehl Summit, NATO has 
recently decided to reengage Russia.  This decision stands. 
The Russian measure is very unfortunate and counterproductive 
to our efforts to restore our dialogue and cooperation with 
Russia.  Thus NATO very much regrets the Russian action and 
does not consider there to be any justification for it. 
 
END TEXT 
 
2.  (U) Please disregard previous message (reftel) as it did 
not contain the Secretary General's complete statement. 
VOLKER