Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07MANILA688, PHILIPPINES -- SEVENTH ANNUAL TRAFFICKING IN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07MANILA688.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07MANILA688 2007-03-01 11:20 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Manila
VZCZCXRO1487
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHML #0688/01 0601120
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 011120Z MAR 07
FM AMEMBASSY MANILA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5485
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS IMMEDIATE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING IMMEDIATE 6007
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL IMMEDIATE 2488
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO IMMEDIATE 3080
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEHIN/AIT TAIPEI IMMEDIATE 1423
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEAWJB/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEAHLC/HOMELAND SECURITY CENTER WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 18 MANILA 000688 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR G/TIP - SNEUMANN, MTAYLOR 
STATE ALSO FOR G, INL, DRL, PRM, IWI, EAP/RSP, EAP/MTS 
LABOR FOR ILAB 
PASS TO USAID FOR ANE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PHUM KCRM KWMN SMIG KFRD PREF ELAB RP
SUBJECT: PHILIPPINES -- SEVENTH ANNUAL TRAFFICKING IN 
PERSONS REPORT 
 
REF: A. 06 STATE 202745 
     B. 06 MANILA 944 
 
(U)  This cable is Sensitive but Unclassified -- Please 
handle accordingly. 
 
1.  (U) Mission's seventh annual Trafficking in Persons (TIP) 
report follows below.  The report covers the period from 
April 2006 to March 2007.  Point of contact (POC) is 
Political Officer Barry Fullerton, FullertonTB@State.Gov, 
(632) 528-6300 x2350, fax (632) 523-1195.  Rank of TIP action 
officer is FS-04.  Estimated completion time for report:  SFS 
officer: 2 hours; FS-02 officers: 8 hours; FS-04 officers: 
100 hours; FSN: 80 hours. 
 
======== 
Overview 
======== 
 
2.  (SBU) The answers below are keyed to the format contained 
in Ref A, Para 27: 
 
A.  The Philippines is an origin, destination and, to a 
lesser extent, transit country for men, women, and children 
trafficked for sexual exploitation and forced labor. 
Trafficking also occurs within the country's borders. 
Estimates of various NGOs and government agencies vary 
significantly --  some putting the number of Filipinos 
trafficked internally, into Southeast Asia, and beyond, at 
hundreds of thousands each year.  Aside from working in the 
commercial sex industry, many trafficked persons work as 
domestic servants, as well as in unsafe and exploitative 
industries as forced labor. 
 
Women face a far greater risk of becoming victims of 
trafficking than men, and girls are more at risk than boys. 
Trafficking in children is generally internal: children and 
young women from poor farming communities in the Visayas (the 
central Philippines) and Mindanao (the southern Philippines) 
are brought to major urban centers and employed as factory 
workers, domestic helpers, or prostitutes.  Victims of 
trafficking for sexual exploitation are generally girls, aged 
7 to 16 years old.  Ethnic minorities, migrant workers, and 
other socially marginalized groups are more at risk than 
other groups due to the high prevalence of poverty among them. 
 
The Philippine government (GRP) has no central database of 
trafficking information; however, various GRP agencies and 
non-government organizations document cases of trafficking. 
The GRP's Inter-Agency Council Against Trafficking in Persons 
(IACAT) hopes to create a central database for tracking cases 
of TIP by 2008.  In 2006, the Department of Social Welfare 
and Development reported to have provided services to 1,567 
victims of trafficking or potential victims of trafficking in 
2006.  The Solidarity Center/Trade Union Congress of the 
Philippines Anti-Trafficking Project recorded a total of 29 
trafficking and trafficking-related incidents involving 223 
victims from April 2006 to February 2007. 
 
Sources of information involved in the preparation of this 
report include the following GRP agencies:  the Department of 
Foreign Affairs (DFA); the Department of Justice (DOJ); the 
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD); the 
Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE); the Department of 
Interior and Local Government (DILG); the National Bureau of 
Investigation (NBI); the Bureau of Immigration (BI); the 
Philippine National Police (PNP); the Philippine Overseas 
Employment Agency (POEA); and, the National Commission on the 
Role of Filipino Women (NCRFW).  The following NGOs also 
provided input:  the American Center for International Labor 
Solidarity (ACILS); Trade Union Congress of the Philippines 
(TUCP); the Visayan Forum Foundation (VFF); The Asia 
Foundation (TAF); and the International Justice Mission 
(IJM).  Some information stemmed from media reports. 
 
 
MANILA 00000688  002 OF 018 
 
 
B. Endemic poverty, a high unemployment and underemployment 
rate, a cultural propensity to seek higher living standards 
elsewhere, a weak rule of law environment, and a flourishing 
sex tourism industry all contributed to the continuation of 
trafficking in the Philippines.  Persons were trafficked from 
poor, rural areas throughout the Philippines to major urban 
areas within the country, especially Metro Manila and Cebu. 
Often, foreign trafficking rings brought the victims to 
destinations throughout Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North 
America, and South Africa.  International organized crime 
gangs also trafficked persons from mainland China through the 
Philippines to third country destinations.  Occasionally, the 
Philippines was the final destination point for persons 
trafficked from China. 
 
The GRP made some progress in combating trafficking in 2006, 
particularly in the areas of law enforcement coordination and 
victim protection and assistance.  However, there were no new 
convictions under the 2003 Anti-TIP Law since convictions in 
December 2005, despite dozens of TIP cases pending or already 
on trial in the courts.  Slow processing times, as well as 
corruption within GRP law enforcement agencies, appeared to 
be the key obstacles to additional convictions.  Local 
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) continued to provide 
assistance to victims and placed pressure on GRP officials to 
bolster anti-TIP activities. 
 
After the passage of the anti-trafficking legislation in May 
2003 (R.A.9208), the government established the Task Force on 
Anti-Trafficking in Persons, which is composed of 17 
prosecutors from the DOJ who focused specifically on 
trafficking.  Additionally, approximately 72 prosecutors in 
regional DOJ offices focused on trafficking in persons.  DOJ 
continued to lead the GRP's efforts, with the Secretary of 
Justice acting as Chair of the GRP's anti-TIP coordinating 
body, the Inter-Agency Council Against Trafficking in Persons. 
 
President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and her administration 
frequently spoke out in public about the evils of trafficking 
and the efforts of the GRP to combat TIP.  They made clear 
there was zero tolerance by the GRP relating to TIP in any 
form.  In her State of the Nation Address (SONA) on June 24, 
2006, President Arroyo cited the convictions of human 
traffickers as an important accomplishment resulting in the 
removal of the Philippines from the State Department's Tier 
Two Watchlist.  On December 12, 2006, the President issued 
Proclamation No. 1172, declaring December 12 as the National 
Day Against Trafficking in Persons. 
 
The Anti-TIP Law codified stiff penalties against traffickers 
in women and children and against users or buyers of 
prostituted victims.  Under R.A. 9208, trafficking violators 
face a penalty from six years to life imprisonment and a fine 
ranging from P500,000 to P5 million  (10,200 USD - 102,000 
USD).  Trafficking became a non-bailable offense.  The law 
also entitled victims and survivors to counseling, temporary 
shelter, health care, legal assistance, and access to the 
government's witness protection program.  In 2006, 
prosecutors investigated and pursued 62 cases of alleged 
trafficking under R.A. 9208. 
 
While government agencies undertook extensive efforts 
worldwide to fight trafficking, inadequate funding was a 
chronic problem throughout the government in all fields. 
Anti-trafficking resources focused primarily on prevention 
and protection for overseas Filipino workers.  The strongest 
efforts existed in the areas of helping to prevent persons 
from becoming victims, repatriating victims in destination 
countries, and reintegrating them into Philippine society 
upon their return home. 
 
In coordination with DOLE, the DFA, through its Philippine 
embassies, took the lead in protecting the rights of migrant 
workers abroad.  Philippine Overseas Labor Offices (POLOs), 
the operating arm and overseas representative of DOLE, were 
 
MANILA 00000688  003 OF 018 
 
 
under the supervision of the Philippine Chief of Mission or 
Ambassador.  Thirty-nine labor attaches served at thirty-four 
POLOs around the world at Philippine diplomatic missions. 
Posts with a high number of overseas Filipino workers (OFW), 
such as Hong Kong, Singapore, Jeddah, Dhahrain/Al-Khobar, 
Dubai, Kuwait, and London, employed more than one labor 
attach to deal with the large caseloads.  OFWs reported 
contract violations or abuse to POLOs who, in turn, referred 
the cases to the DFA or DOLE.  POLOs provided access to 
rescue and repatriation, custodial and legal assistance, 
temporary shelter, and medical aid. 
 
DSWD was the responsible agency for the social reintegration 
of victims of trafficking once they returned home.  DSWD 
operated 42 temporary shelters for victims throughout the 
country.  Thirteen of these shelters were supported by the 
Congressional Spouses Foundation, Inc. (CSFI), a non-profit 
charity organization.  In addition to DSWD's services within 
the Philippines, eight social workers were deployed to the 
Philippine diplomatic missions in Hong Kong, Singapore, 
Taipei, Tokyo, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait City, and Riyadh to 
provide psycho-social counseling to OFWs in distress, and 
worked in conjunction with POLOs.  A social welfare attach 
in Malaysia coordinated with the Malaysian government in 
rescuing and repatriating victims of trafficking and other 
forms of abuse.  DSWD also assigned two social workers to 
work with the NGO International Social Service (ISS) in Hong 
Kong and in Tokyo. 
 
The Philippines was only occasionally a destination point for 
internationally trafficked individuals.  Reports indicated 
trafficking from China, South Korea, and Russia of women to 
engage in prostitution.  Internal trafficking generally 
included women from the Visayas and Mindanao regions to major 
metro areas to work as domestic servants or small-factory 
workers, as well as in the drug trade and in the commercial 
sex industry.  Many were victims of traffickers from their 
local areas.  Victims were often subject to violence, 
threats, debt bondage, and withholding of documents. 
 
Traffickers most often targeted the multitudes of workers 
seeking overseas and urban employment.  (More than 1,000,000 
Filipino workers engaged in temporary overseas work 
assignment to all parts of the world in 2006.  An estimated 
12 percent of GDP came from workers' remittances.)  The most 
common recruits for trafficking were girls and young women 
aged 13 to 30 from rural areas, mainly from impoverished 
families.  Girls from ethnic minorities aged 10 to 15 also 
ended up as commercial sex workers.  Traffickers often sent 
female recruiters to their own neighborhoods or villages to 
recruit friends or relatives, providing the victims a false 
sense of security.  Traffickers often masqueraded as private 
employment recruiters, while actually cooperating with 
organized crime rings.  The most common method to approach 
victims was to promise respectable and lucrative jobs with 
good benefits such as free room and board, transportation, 
and cash advances.  Parents and guardians were often 
supportive, believing that work abroad is the key to 
ascending the socio-economic ladder.  Traffickers used fake 
travel documents, falsified permits, and altered birth 
certificates. 
 
C.  The GRP's ability to address the problem remained limited 
by inadequate funding, including for police.  Corruption in 
the government and the general ineffectiveness of the 
judicial system were also factors that impeded the GRP's 
ability to prosecute trafficking cases.  The lack of 
resources and high judgeship vacancy rate in the judiciary 
significantly slowed trial times.  A 2005 UN Development 
Program (UNDP) and Philippine Supreme Court study found that 
the average trial takes over three years.  Many GRP agencies 
have not yet fully implemented the 2003 anti-trafficking law 
due to lack of training and orientation on the scope and 
magnitude of the problem.  While the GRP allocated resources 
through the DSWD to aid victims, funding was insufficient. 
 
MANILA 00000688  004 OF 018 
 
 
National and international NGOs and other foreign donors 
(including the USG) complemented official GRP programs. 
 
D.  The GRP had no central database of trafficking 
information.  Several agencies maintained their own separate 
databases, but many of these did not focus exclusively on 
trafficking.  The Philippine Center on Transnational Crime 
(PCTC) collected information on transnational crime 
activities, but its records were not comprehensive.  The 
Commission on Filipinos Overseas (CFO), an attached agency of 
the DFA, developed a database to monitor legal problems 
involving Filipinos overseas, but its system was not 
restricted to trafficking and also generated reports on other 
cases such as domestic violence and human smuggling.  The CFO 
plans to integrate this information into a shared GRP 
database on migration. 
 
The DILG tasked the National Police Commission (NAPOLCOM) to 
maintain a database of trafficking cases based on the 
quarterly reports from PNP.  In December 2006, the DILG 
directed the PNP to monitor trafficking cases and to provide 
information to the NAPOLCOM database, which NAPOLCOM began to 
make operational. 
 
GRP officials involved in anti-TIP activities met regularly 
with concerned NGOs, foreign donors, embassies, and regional 
and international organizations to share information and 
assessments, but all agreed solid data about the extent of 
the problem remained difficult to obtain. 
 
========== 
PREVENTION 
========== 
 
3. (SBU) The answers below are keyed to the format contained 
in Ref A, Para 28: 
 
A.  The GRP considered trafficking a serious issue and 
actively took steps to combat trafficking.  President Arroyo 
and her administration frequently spoke out in public about 
the evils of trafficking and the efforts of the GRP to combat 
TIP.  They made clear the GRP has zero tolerance for TIP in 
any form.  Senior officials also stressed that the GRP would 
not condone official complicity in such trafficking.  In June 
2005, PNP arrested and DOJ charged police officer Dennis Reci 
for allegedly trafficking minors to engage in sexual slavery 
at his nightclub in Manila (which authorities shut down). 
Trial hearings were still ongoing; however, a decision is 
expected in 2007. 
 
In December 2006, POEA issued new employment requirements for 
overseas Filipino household workers better to protect them 
from widespread employer abuse and trafficking in persons. 
The new requirements increased the monthly minimum wage from 
US$200 to US$400 and raised the minimum age from 18 to 23. 
In addition, household workers must obtain a certificate of 
competency to attest to their skills and employers to submit 
employment contracts for verification.  POEA acknowledged the 
measures were necessary because, while household workers 
accounted for approximately 10 percent of all overseas 
workers, they represented 90 percent of all complaints to 
Filipino labor attaches worldwide. 
 
B.  Several cabinet level agencies and sub-agencies actively 
worked to combat trafficking in the Philippines.  The IACAT 
coordinated, monitored, and oversaw the implementation of 
R.A. 9208, and served as an umbrella organization to 
coordinate anti-TIP efforts.  The DOJ Secretary and the DSWD 
Secretary co-chaired IACAT.  Other member agencies included 
 
SIPDIS 
DFA, DOLE, POEA, NCRFW, NBI, BI, and the PNP.  Three NGOs 
representing women, children, and overseas Filipino workers 
were also part of the IACAT. 
 
On September 20-22, 2006, the IACAT, in partnership and with 
support from the donor community, held the First National 
 
MANILA 00000688  005 OF 018 
 
 
Conference on Anti-trafficking in Persons in Manila.  The 
national conference brought together government 
organizations, NGOs, and civil society groups to facilitate a 
multi-sectoral assessment of the initial progress in the 
implementation of the national strategic action plan against 
trafficking in persons; generate concrete, doable, and 
measurable commitments from various sectors including funding 
organizations; and share relevant experiences, good 
practices, and success stories. 
 
In August 2006, the GRP created the Task Force Against 
Illegal Recruitment (TFAIR) to develop strategies against 
illegal recruitment activities, such as escort services at 
international airports.  The DFA's Commission on Filipinos 
Overseas (CFO) chaired the task force, with representatives 
from PNP, NBI, and other law enforcement agencies as members. 
 
Various other GRP agencies' efforts in anti-trafficking 
included: 
 
-- DFA extended assistance to victims of trafficking abroad 
and oversaw the voluntary repatriation of victims.  It acted 
as the central coordinating unit for all bilateral, regional, 
and multilateral efforts.  The DFA's CFO provided 
pre-departure orientation and counseling services and offered 
liaison services to Filipinos immigrating overseas with the 
help of other GRP and private agencies.  The CFO also 
coordinated with the BI regarding the apprehension of 
violators; 
 
-- The DFA's Office of the Undersecretary for Migrant Workers 
Affairs (OUMWA) addressed trafficking issues involving 
migrant workers.  It worked in conjunction with other GRP 
agencies, overseas workers, their families, NGOs, and 
religious groups to deliver assistance to Philippine 
nationals; 
 
-- DSWD focused on the protection of victims.  It implemented 
rehabilitative and protective programs for trafficked 
persons.  It also provided temporary shelter to trafficked 
persons and abused women in coordination with NGOs; 
 
-- DOLE was responsible for coordinating the GRP campaign 
against illegal recruitment and for maintaining records of 
overseas Filipino workers.  It ensured the strict 
implementation of, and compliance with, the rules and 
guidelines on the employment of persons locally and overseas. 
 It also monitored, documented, and reported cases of 
trafficking in persons involving employers and labor 
recruiters.  DOLE officers worked as labor attaches at 
Philippine diplomatic missions and spent much of their time 
assisting overseas workers; 
 
-- The Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA), an 
attached agency of DOLE, had responsibility for protecting 
overseas workers and their dependents.  It provided 
counseling and legal assistance programs to overseas workers 
and conducted information dissemination and awareness 
campaigns.  In countries with large numbers of OFWs, an OWWA 
officer often served as Assistant Labor Attach; 
 
-- DOJ was responsible for protecting the rights of victims 
of trafficking and prosecuting traffickers.  It also offered 
free legal assistance for trafficked persons in coordination 
with the DSWD, the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP), 
and NGOs.  Fourteen prosecutors at the national office and 
about 45 prosecutors in regional offices specifically focused 
on trafficking cases; 
 
-- NBI, PNP, and the National Police Commission (NAPOLCOM) 
worked to identify, investigate, and dismantle trafficking 
operations and prosecute offenders.  The NBI created a task 
force on the protection of women against exploitation and 
abuse, and a separate task force on the protection of 
children; 
 
MANILA 00000688  006 OF 018 
 
 
 
-- DILG conducted systematic information and prevention 
campaigns, and was creating a databank for the efficient 
monitoring, documentation, and prosecution of cases of 
trafficking in persons; 
 
-- NCRFW instituted development plans for women and provided 
technical assistance in setting up and strengthening response 
to gender issues.  It formulated and monitored policies on 
trafficking in persons in coordination with relevant 
government agencies; 
 
-- BI administered and enforced immigration and alien 
administration laws and adopted measures for the apprehension 
of suspected traffickers both at the place of arrival and 
departure.  It ensured the compliance of Filipinos engaged or 
married to foreign nationals with the guidance and counseling 
requirements in the trafficking law.  It also controlled and 
monitored border points by deploying deputized marines to 
help enforce immigration laws; 
 
-- POEA, affiliated with DOLE, was the primary administrator 
of licenses for recruitment agencies.  An average of 3,000 -- 
and as many as 5,000 -- citizens visited POEA's main office 
each day, seeking employment overseas.  Recruitment agencies 
cannot solicit employees for overseas work without the 
permission of POEA.  POEA had authority to place on probation 
or bar from recruiting new workers any agencies in violation 
of POEA standards.  POEA also administered pre-employment 
orientation seminars and pre-departure counseling programs to 
applicants for overseas employment.  POEA trained diplomatic 
staff, overseas labor officers, and social welfare officers 
in methods for assisting trafficking victims abroad.  It also 
provided free legal assistance to trafficked victims. 
According to POEA, the majority of trafficking cases reported 
to labor attaches occurred in Malaysia, followed by Korea, 
Japan, and the Middle East as a region; 
 
-- PCTC collected information for the effective monitoring, 
documentation, and prosecution of trafficking cases. 
 
C.  GRP agencies increased the frequency of their TIP 
information and education campaigns, mostly thanks to funding 
by bilateral  international donor agencies. 
 
-- The GRP, through IACAT, produced an anti-TIP infomercial 
that aired on local TV networks throughout the country in 
2006.  The infomercial provided basic information about TIP 
as well as information on how to report incidents to proper 
authorities; 
 
-- NCRFW, in partnership with End Child Prostitution and 
Trafficking (ECPAT), the Coalition Against Trafficking of 
Women ) Asia Pacific (CATW-AP), and other NGOs, conducted 
community awareness and education campaigns throughout the 
country in 2006; 
 
-- POEA conducted nearly 1,000 pre-employment orientation 
seminars for more than 60,000 departing overseas Filipino 
workers (OFWs) in 2006.  These seminars sought to educate the 
OFWs on the risks and rewards of overseas employment.  The 
seminar module included a video presentation on trafficking 
in persons; 
 
-- In 2006, IACAT, in collaboration with ECPAT, CATW-AP, and 
USAID, conducted road show campaigns against human 
trafficking in two provinces (Samar and Baguio) identified as 
TIP &hotspot8 areas. The road shows aimed to raise the 
level of awareness in the community, especially for potential 
victims of trafficking and their families; 
 
-- From April 2006 to February 2007, the ACILS/TUCP 
Anti-Trafficking Project conducted public awareness 
activities on TIP in 14 regions of the country.  ACILS also 
distributed information, education, and communication 
 
MANILA 00000688  007 OF 018 
 
 
materials on migration and trafficking issues to youth, 
women, civic and faith-based groups; 
 
D.  The GRP supported numerous additional programs to prevent 
trafficking.  It promoted women's participation in economic 
decision-making and efforts to keep children enrolled in 
school.  It provided skills training for women and access to 
capital via micro-loans to create new jobs.  The goals of 
these efforts were to promote the local economy and lessen 
the need for women to go to urban centers or abroad to earn 
money. 
 
DOLE was the lead agency of the National Program Against 
Child Labor (NPACL), a comprehensive inter-agency response to 
child labor in the Philippines.  The program focused on 
preventing children from becoming victims of the worst forms 
of child labor (including trafficking) and ensuring that 
victims would receive protection and reintegration into 
society. 
 
The CFO counseled Filipinos engaged or married to foreign 
nationals and provided information on intermarriage, 
migration, rights, and obligations, as well as available 
support networks abroad.  Counseling sessions help to 
identify women at-risk of trafficking and foreigners engaging 
in trafficking activities under the pretext of intermarriage. 
 In order to obtain a marriage certificate, local registrars 
required that foreigners obtain a "Legal Capacity to Marry" 
statement from their embassy, attesting they were not married 
abroad. 
 
DSWD provided social protection and promoted the rights and 
welfare of the disadvantaged sector.  DSWD posted social 
workers at international airports to monitor the travel of 
minors abroad.  The Crisis Intervention Unit of DSWD's Quick 
Response Team served the needs of women victims of 
trafficking by strengthening and establishing working 
arrangements with government, non-government, professional, 
and civic organizations.  Other efforts included organizing 
support groups and providing psycho-social, medical, legal 
and counseling services. 
 
The Bureau of Non-Formal Education, an agency under the 
Department of Education (DepEd), developed learning modules 
for Parents of Working Children (PWC) in various regions with 
high incidence of the worst forms of child labor.  Translated 
into local dialects, the modules educated parents about their 
children's health needs and basic rights and opportunities 
for livelihood and income-generating projects.  DepEd also 
operated a home study program designed to prevent students 
from quitting school due to poverty, illness, or early 
marriage.  With assistance from POEA and CFO, DepEd 
incorporated lessons on international migration (including 
illegal recruitment and mail order brides) into social 
studies and values education in public elementary and high 
schools throughout the country. 
 
The POEA conducted pre-departure seminars for migrant 
workers, covering topics such as contracts, wages, benefits, 
etc.  It also provided comprehensive community education and 
programs on trafficking. 
 
E.  The relationship among GRP officials, NGOs, and other 
elements of civil society concerned with trafficking issues 
was excellent.  NGOs assisted the government in preventing 
trafficking activities, protecting and reintegrating 
trafficking victims, and prosecuting traffickers.  NGOs often 
referred trafficking victims to GRP agencies, as the NGOs 
lacked the necessary funding fully to help victims and their 
families.  GRP agencies recognized the importance of engaging 
NGOs in their advocacy programs.  Several GRP agencies had 
NGO desks that oversaw GRP-NGO coordination.  Additionally, 
three NGOs focused on women, children, and OFWs were part of 
the IACAT. 
 
 
MANILA 00000688  008 OF 018 
 
 
Two examples of strong NGO-government relationships were the 
experiences of the Visayan Forum Foundation and the 
International Justice Mission.  The VFF coordinated closely 
with local law enforcement and private industry in rescuing 
trafficking victims at Manila's North Harbor and other ports. 
 From April 2006 to January 2007, the VFF assisted 2,920 
victims of trafficking at major port areas.  Since 2001, the 
IJM, a US-based NGO employing private Filipino investigators 
and prosecutors, coordinated with the GRP to increase the 
number of pro bono prosecutions in the country, including 
under the 2003 anti-trafficking law.  IJM investigated and 
gathered evidence against establishments that employed 
prostitutes and children, and shared this information with 
the NBI and the PNP.  IJM's private prosecutors then filed 
criminal cases for sexually abused women and children.  IJM 
and DOJ prosecutors coordinated in pursuing legal cases.  The 
U.S. Department of State's International Narcotics and Law 
Enforcement Bureau (INL) funded in 2004 a two-year project 
for IJM to accelerate prosecutions nationwide. 
 
F.  Approximately five million passengers transited Manila's 
North Harbor annually, the country's largest port.  As many 
as half were in search of employment.  Despite efforts to 
guard major port areas, the GRP did not have sufficient 
resources adequately to monitor its borders.  With more than 
7,000 islands, fully monitoring maritime borders was 
virtually impossible given the limited resources of the 
maritime services. 
 
The Philippine Coast Guard, under the Department of 
Transportation and Communication (DOTC), intercepted some 
ferries in order to identify trafficked victims and illegal 
recruiters in coordination with private shipping companies. 
The Maritime Police conducted investigations upon the 
disembarkation of passengers.  It referred victims of 
trafficking to GRP agencies or local NGOs for further 
assistance. 
 
Owners, managers, and key personnel of shipping companies 
conducted regular orientation and awareness seminars with 
their crews to educate them on ways to identify and report 
suspected trafficking victims onboard.  Often, shipping 
companies assisted in facilitating the repatriation of minors 
by offering discounted fares. 
 
In February 2007, IACAT established its first 
anti-trafficking task force at Manila's international 
airport.  The Ninoy Aquino International Airport Task Force 
Against Trafficking in Persons included representatives from 
the Manila International Airport Authority, the Airport 
Police Department, BI, NBI, PNP, Pasay City Prosecutor's 
Office, POEA, Bureau of Customs, DFA, CFO, DSWD, and the 
Airline Operators Council.  The Task Force will improve 
information-sharing across agencies in order to improve the 
interception, investigation, and prosecution of traffickers, 
as well as to coordinate immediate assistance to trafficking 
victims.  IACAT plans to establish similar task forces at the 
airports in Cebu, Davao, and Zamboanga. 
 
G.  The IACAT coordinated, monitored, and oversaw the 
implementation of the Anti-TIP Law, and served as an umbrella 
organization to coordinate anti-TIP efforts in the 
Philippines.  The DOJ Secretary and the DWSD Secretary 
co-chaired the IACAT.  Other member agencies included DFA, 
DOLE, POEA, NCRFW, NBI, BI, and the PNP.  Three NGOs 
representing women, children, and overseas Filipino workers 
were also part of the IACAT. 
 
In addition to the national-level IACAT, the GRP created 
local and regional inter-agency councils against TIP.  The 
local IACATs similarly included various GRP agencies, local 
government units, and NGOs.  Alongside the local IACATs, 
local task forces in some hot spot areas coordinated law 
enforcement and prosecution efforts. 
 
 
MANILA 00000688  009 OF 018 
 
 
The DOJ led a National Task Force on the Protection of Women 
Against Abuse, Exploitation, and Discrimination, as well as a 
Task Force on Child Protection, to address violation cases 
against women and children. 
 
The Anti-Illegal Recruitment Coordinating Councils (AIRCCs) 
served as a venue at the grassroots level for consultation 
and information sharing to map out strategies in improving 
the GRP's anti-illegal recruitment programs. 
 
The Sub-Committee on Human Trafficking of the National Law 
Enforcement Coordinating Committee (NALECC) met regularly for 
data sharing on human trafficking cases and adopting measures 
to improve coordination. 
 
Local Councils for the Protection of Children existed at the 
provincial, city, municipality, and village levels to assist 
in identifying conditions related to child abuse, neglect, 
and exploitation, and to facilitate immediate responses to 
reported cases of child abuse and exploitation. 
 
Both the Office of the Ombudsman and the Presidential 
Anti-Graft Commission pursued official corruption cases and 
coordinated the GRP's anti-corruption efforts. 
 
H.  The GRP had a national plan to address TIP, created with 
NGO input.  IACAT implemented the plan involving DOJ, DSWD, 
DOLE, and other agencies.  All agencies involved in IACAT had 
shared responsibilities for developing and implementing 
anti-trafficking programs.  As co-chair of IACAT, the DOJ 
ensured the protection of persons accused of trafficking, 
provided access to free GRP or NGO legal assistance, and 
trained prosecutors in handling trafficking-related cases. 
DSWD took the lead in implementing rehabilitative and 
protective programs for trafficked persons and providing 
victims with counseling and temporary shelter.  It also 
developed a system for accreditation among NGOs in order to 
establish centers and programs for intervention at the 
community level. 
 
============================================ 
INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKERS 
============================================ 
 
4. (SBU) The answers below are keyed to the format contained 
in Ref A, Para 29. 
 
A.  The Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003 (Republic Act 
9208) is the Philippine landmark legislation in protecting 
women and children from sexual exploitation and forced labor. 
 The law affirmed the GRP's resolve to prevent and suppress 
the illegal trade in persons, especially women and children, 
and carried penalties not only against traffickers but also 
against users or buyers of victims. If the victim of 
trafficking was a minor, the recruitment, transportation, 
transfer, harboring, or receipt of the child for the purpose 
of exploitation was enough to file a case against a 
trafficker.  There was no need to show that such acts were 
made through threats, use of force, or other coercive 
measures. 
 
In addition to the anti-trafficking law, the GRP used several 
laws to prosecute traffickers, including:  the Migrant 
Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act (Republic Act 8042), which 
gave the GRP the authority to combat illegal recruiting; the 
Mail-Order Bride Law (Republic Act 6955), which made it 
unlawful under exploitative circumstances for Filipino women 
to marry foreign men; the Inter-Country Adoption Act of 1995 
(Republic Act 8043), which ensured the protection of Filipino 
children from abuse, exploitation, trafficking, and/or sale; 
the Special Protection of Children Against Child Abuse, 
Exploitation, and Discrimination Act (Republic Act 7610), 
which established penalties for traffickers; and the 
Anti-Child Labor Law (Republic Act 9231), which prohibited 
the employment of children below 15 except when granted 
 
MANILA 00000688  010 OF 018 
 
 
special permission by DOLE, and guaranteed the protection, 
health, and safety of child workers. 
 
B.  The Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003 imposed harsh 
penalties on persons engaged in trafficking.  The law 
distinguished three types of violations: direct participation 
in trafficking; acts that promoted trafficking; and more 
serious acts of trafficking, called "qualified" trafficking. 
The penalty for a direct act was a fine of P1 million to P2 
million (20,400 USD - 40,800 USD) and 20 years imprisonment; 
promotion of trafficking through falsification of documents 
and tampering with certificates carried up to 15 years 
imprisonment and a fine of P500,000 to P1 million (10,200 USD 
- 20,400 USD).  The maximum penalty was if the victim was a 
child, if conducted on a large scale, or if the crime 
involved military or law enforcement agencies and public 
officers or employees, which could result in life 
imprisonment and a fine of P2 million to P5 million (40,800 
USD - 102,000 USD).  Those who engaged the services of 
trafficked persons for prostitution faced penalties of 
between six months of community service and a fine of P50,000 
(1,020 USD) to a maximum of one-year imprisonment and a fine 
of P100,000 (2,040 USD). 
 
C.  The Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003 prescribed 
the same penalties for forced or bonded labor as for sexual 
exploitation.  The law clearly stated that it was illegal to 
recruit, transport, transfer, harbor, provide, or receive a 
person by any means, including under the pretext of domestic 
or overseas employment, training, or apprenticeship, for the 
purpose of prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, 
forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude, or debt 
bondage.  Activities that promoted or facilitated trafficking 
could result in imprisonment of up to 15 years and a fine 
between P500,000 to P1 million (10,200 USD - 20,400 USD). 
 
D.  Under Republic Act 8353, the Anti-Rape Law of 1997, the 
penalty for rape ranged from life imprisonment to death. 
Under Republic Act 7877, or the Anti-Sexual Harassment Act of 
1995, any person who violated the provisions of the act shall 
face imprisonment of not less than one month or more than six 
months, or a fine of up to P20,000 (400 USD), or both a fine 
and imprisonment. 
 
E.  Prostitution was illegal, but remained widespread.  Many 
prostitutes worked independently in small brothels rather 
than in prominent entertainment clubs.  Hostesses, referred 
to as "guest relations officers" (GROs), sometimes engaged in 
illegal prostitution, although their employers usually barred 
them from leaving an establishment with a customer.  The GRP 
required GROs to undergo frequent health checks. 
 
An anti-prostitution bill was under consideration in the 
House of Representatives in its 13th session.  It would 
punish those involved in the industry, such as pimps and 
brothel owners, while decriminalizing the action of those 
exploited in the prostitution industry.  The draft bill 
stated that women and children who engaged in prostitution 
could be victims and should be free from criminal liability. 
It also stated that people exploited in prostitution were 
entitled to support, protection, and may seek legal redress. 
 
F.  In 2006, law enforcement agencies filed 60 trafficking 
cases with DOJ.  Of these, DOJ filed 26 in court, while the 
rest were in preliminary investigation.  In total, DOJ had 
ongoing prosecutions in 97 cases, including cases filed in 
previous years.  Courts in 2005 convicted four individuals in 
two cases under the 2003 anti-trafficking law.  All four 
convicted traffickers received life sentences because the 
crime was determined to be "qualified trafficking" due to the 
involvement of minors as victims and of organized trafficking 
syndicates.  Their appeals were ongoing.  Three of the 
convicted traffickers were in jail serving their sentences, 
while one was out on bail pending his appeal.  In addition, 
two traffickers pled guilty to the lesser charge of using the 
 
MANILA 00000688  011 OF 018 
 
 
services of a trafficking victim in November 2005, resulting 
in a sentence of six months community service.  There were no 
new convictions under the Anti-TIP Law during this reporting 
period.  However, the absence of new convictions did not 
necessarily reflect an unwillingness to prosecute or convict; 
instead, it reflected a judicial process that on average 
takes three years from the filing of charges to resolution of 
a case.  There were convictions under related legislation, 
such as child abuse and illegal recruitment. 
 
Under certain circumstances and with approval of the court, 
Philippine law permitted private prosecutors to prosecute 
cases under the direction and control of a public prosecutor. 
 The GRP used this provision effectively, allowing and 
supporting IJM to investigate and prosecute trafficking 
cases.  In addition to DOJ's ongoing TIP cases, IJM initiated 
23 criminal cases of qualified trafficking against suspected 
traffickers.  Of these 23 cases, ten were on trial at the end 
of the reporting period, three were in preliminary hearings, 
five were under investigation, three were in arraignment, and 
two were pending review with the DOJ. 
 
The GRP's system of collecting and maintaining data on 
criminal activity in general was inefficient but improving, 
including on trafficking.  The IACAT provided its best 
available information for this report in a pro-active and 
helpfully responsive manner. 
 
G.  NGOs reported that organized crime syndicates from Japan 
and China controlled most of the sex industry in Manila. 
Employment agencies were involved in much of the trafficking 
both within the country and to overseas destinations.  They 
may also have had a role in trafficking of persons into the 
country.  Some of these agencies may have also undertaken 
legitimate recruitment of personnel, making it particularly 
challenging to identify illegal recruitment, as the line 
between legitimate and illegitimate agencies was blurred. 
Other recruiters may have been relatives or neighbors, while 
some parents and guardians sold their children into bondage. 
In many cases, trafficking syndicates used Filipino women in 
their mid-40s or older to seek out victims, given a belief 
that older women were the least likely to harm younger women. 
 
H.  The GRP actively investigated cases of 
trafficking-related offenses, but was hampered by scarce 
resources.  The principal investigative agencies were BI, 
NBI, and PNP.  At PNP, the Criminal Investigation and 
Detection Group (CIDG) and the Women and Children's Concerns 
Division handled most trafficking cases.  From April 2006 to 
December 2006, PNP investigated 31 cases of trafficking, 
involving 35 victims, of whom 32 were children and 3 were 
women.  PNP recommended 29 cases to the DOJ for prosecution. 
 
The BI ensured that all foreign nationals within its 
territorial jurisdiction complied with existing laws to 
ensure the protection of women and children against 
commercial sexual exploitation.  BI's interceptions at 
Philippine airports typically went to NBI for further 
investigation. 
 
Private attorneys working for NGOs such as the IJM and VFF 
could file trafficking cases on behalf of victims.  The 
Anti-Wiretapping Act of 1965 did not authorize most forms of 
electronic surveillance, although a new &Human Security Act 
of 20078 that Congress approved in February 2007 will expand 
such coverage. 
 
I.  GRP agencies continued to increase the frequency of TIP 
training and orientation efforts.  The programs included 
training for several thousand officials, including 
prosecutors, judges, NBI investigators, local government 
units, and city councilors.  In 2006, the IACAT, under 
USAID's Rule of Law Effectiveness Program, conducted training 
and consultations with prosecutors and law enforcers on 
investigating and prosecuting trafficking in persons cases 
 
MANILA 00000688  012 OF 018 
 
 
and seminars on effective coordination and networking against 
TIP. 
 
In September 2006, the IACAT, in coordination with UNICEF, 
USAID, and TAF, hosted the first National Conference to 
Combat Trafficking in Persons.  These events brought together 
hundreds of officials and NGO leaders to develop an anti-TIP 
strategy and action plan for 2007. 
 
In 2006, BI trained many of its immigration officers on 
gender-sensitivity, as well child-friendly investigation 
techniques. 
 
J. The GRP cooperated with other governments in the 
investigation and prosecution of TIP cases, including with 
Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Hong Kong, and Sweden. 
Because there was no central database linking the various law 
enforcement agencies, there was no certain total number of 
cooperative investigations conducted.  The Philippines had 
treaties on mutual legal assistance on criminal matters with 
Australia and the United States.  The Philippines was also a 
signatory to the ASEAN Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty to 
share information and evidence among ASEAN member-states. 
 
The Philippines participated in other international efforts 
to prevent, monitor, and control trafficking.  Having 
completed Phase I of an agreement with the United Nations 
Center for International Crime Prevention-Office for Drug 
Control and Crime Prevention (CICP/ODCCP) to gather 
information on organized criminal groups involved in 
trafficking, the DSWD began to implemented the second phase 
of a project to provide capacity building to service 
providers in havens for women and children, rehabilitate 
trafficked victims by providing full security, financial 
assistance, and non-formal training, and establish linkages 
with the business community for possible internship programs. 
 
 
K.  Philippine law permitted extradition, and the Philippines 
had extradition treaties with Australia, Canada, the 
Federated States of Micronesia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, 
Republic of Korea, Switzerland, the United States, and the 
Kingdom of Thailand.  Under the terms of the 2003 
anti-trafficking law, trafficking in persons was an 
extraditable offense.  However, the government received no 
extradition requests for trafficking offenders, foreign or 
national. 
 
L.  There was no evidence establishing official involvement 
in, or tolerance of, trafficking on a local and institutional 
level.  However, officials (such as customs officers, border 
guards, immigration officials, local police or others) 
allegedly received bribes from traffickers or otherwise 
assisted in their operations. 
 
M.  The Office of the Ombudsman conducted regular 
investigations into corruption allegations.  In June 2005, 
DOJ charged a Manila police officer for violating the 
Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act, leading to the arrest of 
Officer Dennis Reci for allegedly trafficking minors for 
sexual exploitation at his nightclub in Manila (which 
authorities shut down).  He remained under detention at the 
Manila City Jail; the trial hearing continued. 
 
N.  Child sex tourism continued to be a serious problem for 
the Philippines.  Sex tourists reportedly came from Europe, 
the United States, and parts of Asia to engage in sexual 
activity with minors.  The GRP cooperated with the USG in 
prosecuting American nationals under the terms of the U.S. 
PROTECT Act of 2003, which criminalized the commission by 
American nationals overseas of child abuse, including child 
pornography and other sexual offenses against a minor.  The 
Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement of the U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security noted the stellar cooperation 
from the GRP in three notable PROTECT Act cases involving 
 
MANILA 00000688  013 OF 018 
 
 
Edilberto Datan, Bernard Lawrence Russell, and John W. 
Seljan.  In each case, the individuals traveled to the 
Philippines to engage in sexual activity with minors.  All 
three received convictions; courts also ordered Edilberto 
Datan and Bernard Russell to pay restitution fees to their 
victims. 
 
O.  The GRP signed and ratified the following international 
instruments: 
 
-- ILO Convention 182 Concerning the Prohibition and 
Immediate Action for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of 
Child Labor: ratified in October 2000; 
 
-- ILO Convention 105 on the Abolition of Forced Labor: 
ratified in November 1960; 
 
-- ILO Convention 29 Concerning Forced Labor: ratified on 
July 15, 2005; 
 
-- Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in 
Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the 
Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime: ratified in 
October 2001; 
 
-- Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children, Child 
Prostitution and 
Child Pornography supplementing the Convention on the Rights 
of the Child: ratified in April 2002; 
 
-- Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons 
and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others: 
ratified in September 1952; 
 
-- International Convention for the Suppression of the 
Traffic in Women and Children: ratified in September 1954; 
 
-- International Convention for the Suppression of the 
Traffic in Women of Full Age: ratified in September 1954; 
 
-- United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms 
of Discrimination Against Women: ratified in May 1981; 
 
-- United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: 
ratified in September 1990; 
 
-- UN International Convention on the Protection of the 
Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families: 
ratified on July 1995; 
 
-- Oslo Agenda of Action on Child Labor: ratified in December 
1991; 
 
-- 1996 Stockholm Declaration and Agenda for Action Against 
Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children: ratified in 
December 1992; 
 
-- The Optional Protocol on the Suppression of Trafficking in 
Persons Especially Women and Children: ratified in October 
2001; 
 
-- UN Convention on Transnational Crime: ratified in May 2002. 
 
==================================== 
PROTECTION AND ASSISTANCE TO VICTIMS 
==================================== 
 
5. (SBU) The answers below are keyed to the format contained 
in Ref A, Para 30. 
 
A.  The GRP assisted victims by providing temporary residency 
status, relief from deportation, shelter, and access to 
legal, medical, and psychological services.  Additional 
protective services included telephone hotlines for reporting 
abused/exploited cases of women and children. 
 
MANILA 00000688  014 OF 018 
 
 
 
The DSWD's Residential Care unit provided 24-hour residential 
group care to children on a temporary basis to facilitate 
healing, recovery, and reintegration with their families and 
communities.  DSWD maintained 42 residential care units; of 
these, 13 centers were for women, 13 for girls, and the 
remaining for men, boys, and the elderly.  Substitute homes, 
or havens, served the needs of female victims of trafficking 
and other forms of abuse.  Twelve substitute homes provided 
shelter for over 1,400 women and their children.  The DSWD 
also referred cases to accredited NGOs for children and 
accredited NGOs for women, which provided temporary shelter 
and community services to women and children in crisis, 
including victims of trafficking.  During 2006, the DSWD 
assisted 1,567 people through its residential and community 
based services. 
 
Crisis intervention and child protection units operated in 
many public hospitals throughout the country.  The crisis 
units also provided telephone counseling, conducted rescue 
operations, and provided overnight facilities and referral 
services for longer-term shelters.  Women and Children 
Protection Units in Department of Health (DOH) hospitals 
offered medical services and psychological counseling to 
victims of violence.  The Philippine General Hospital in 
Manila evaluated and treated TIP victims on behalf of the GRP. 
 
The Philippines AIDS Prevention and Control Act required 
documented Overseas Filipino Workers to participate in a 
HIV/AIDS seminar as part of the Pre-Departure Orientation 
Seminar.  Actual testing was only upon the request of the OFW 
or if the country of destination so required, especially for 
sea-based workers.  The law did not provide mandatory 
HIV/AIDS screening for trafficking victims.  However, the 
rate of HIV/AIDS in the Philippines remained low, although 
often cases may have been underreported.  UNAIDS estimated 
that 12,000 people lived with HIV in the Philippines, but 
this figure could grow quickly. 
 
B.  The GRP cooperated well with NGOs to support and provide 
services to trafficking victims.  The Philippine Ports 
Authority's Gender and Development (GAD) Focal Point Program, 
an agency under the DOTC, provided the building and amenities 
for a halfway house, which the VFF managed.  Activities of 
the halfway house staff included regular inspection of the 
different port areas, assistance to possible victims of 
traffickers and victims of illegal recruitment, information 
dissemination, and basic orientation seminars. 
 
In July 2006, VFF signed a 10-year agreement with the Manila 
International Airport Authority to establish an airport 
halfway house for TIP victims.  Under this partnership, VFF 
will also train airport immigration and customs officials on 
how to identify potential victims of human trafficking. 
 
VFF ran the Multi-Sectoral Network Against Trafficking in 
Persons (MSNAT) to promote cooperation and sustain 
partnership among government, NGOs, the private sector, and 
civil society.  GRP partners included the DOJ, DOLE, DFA, 
DILG, DSWD, National Police Commission, Philippine Ports 
Authority (PPA), and the Commission on Human Rights.  DSWD 
provided limited funding to accredited NGOs to help meet the 
basic needs of victims, such as food, clothing, medicine, and 
legal services.  With assistance from DFA, DSWD established 
arrangements with NGOs in other countries to provide 
distressed OFWs with temporary shelter, counseling, and 
medical assistance. 
 
VFF, which the State Department's Trafficking in Persons 
Report highlighted in 2004 for its best practices, renewed a 
five-year partnership agreement with the Philippine Ports 
Authority to continue to operate halfway houses for victims 
and potential victims of TIP, currently in Manila, Batangas, 
Sorsogon, and Davao.  It plans to open additional halfway 
houses and safe houses for TIP victims in other regions. 
 
MANILA 00000688  015 OF 018 
 
 
 
In general, NGOs cannot rely on government funding.  They 
typically turned to foreign governments, foreign and domestic 
religious groups, third-country and multinational donor 
agencies, and private foundations.  However, the GRP remained 
highly aware of the value of NGOs in combating trafficking, 
and routinely sought cooperation and input from NGOs. 
 
C.  The implementing rules of the 2003 anti-trafficking law 
outlined procedures to identify and refer victims of 
trafficking, whether the incident occurred inside or outside 
of the country.  After rescue operations, investigation, and 
filing of cases, victims of trafficking rescued within the 
country went under the custody of the DSWD for proper 
treatment.  For cases overseas, consular officers and 
personnel from the POLO conducted visits to the jail, work 
site, or residence of the victim, and then provided temporary 
shelter, and legal, financial, and repatriation assistance to 
the victims.  Upon arrival in the Philippines, the DSWD, the 
NBI, or PNP provided psycho-social interventions, 
psychological and medical examinations, and therapy sessions, 
if necessary. 
 
Port personnel referred victims, as well as domestic workers 
detained at port police stations, to the halfway houses run 
by the VFF.  The DSWD also referred cases of physical and 
verbal abuse against domestic workers to VFF for 
psycho-social intervention and short-term care until 
repatriation of the victims.  The VFF maintained four halfway 
houses in strategic port areas in Manila, Davao, Batangas, 
and Sorsogon, and similarly coordinated with the PPA, DOLE, 
DSWD, shipping companies, and workers' groups.  Halfway house 
staff provided direct services to trafficked victims in 
ports, including temporary shelter, referral, repatriation, 
and counseling. 
 
D.  The 2003 anti-trafficking law recognized trafficked 
persons as victims and did not penalize them for crimes 
related to the acts of trafficking or for obeying 
traffickers, regardless of their consent to exploitation. 
Police sometimes brought charges of vagrancy against alleged 
prostitutes, however. 
 
E.  The GRP actively encouraged victims to assist in the 
investigation and prosecution of trafficking and related 
crimes.  Victims can file civil suits or seek legal action 
against traffickers.  The Secretary of Justice issued a DOJ 
Circular instructing that all cases involving violations of 
the anti-trafficking law should receive preferential 
attention.  The circular also ordered all prosecutors to 
reject calls by defense attorneys for dismissal of cases in 
which the victims recant their testimony.  Pursuant to the 
Rape Victim Assistance and Protection Act, an all-female team 
of police officers, examining physicians, and prosecutors 
must handle investigations of offenses committed against 
women.  In the case of trafficked children, the Special 
Protection of Children Act and the Rule on Examination of a 
Child Witness mandated that a single panel interview to avoid 
the damaging effect of feeling re-victimized through a series 
of repeated questioning.  All fines by the courts on the 
offenders accrue to a Trust Fund that IACAT administered, 
which it used to prevent acts of trafficking, protect and 
rehabilitate victims, and reintegrate trafficked persons into 
the community. 
 
F.  Under the Witness Protection, Security, and Benefit 
Program, the DOJ offered protection to witnesses from 
reprisals and economic dislocation by providing security 
protection, immunity from criminal prosecution, housing, 
livelihood expenses, travel expenses, medical benefits, 
education to dependents, and job security.  However, some 
witness protection participants complained of insufficient 
security and of abusive guards.  Moreover, due to lack of 
resources to fund the program, many who would have liked to 
participate could not.  Many other potential witnesses may 
 
MANILA 00000688  016 OF 018 
 
 
not have been aware of the existence of this program.  In 
addition to the halfway houses, VFF also ran two safehouses 
in Manila and Legazpi for longer protective custody of 
victims, especially for those who decided to take legal 
actions against traffickers. 
 
G.  The GRP, through IACAT and with funding from USAID and 
others, conducted regular training seminars for GRP 
officials, including those from DSWD, PNP, DOJ, DFA, DOLE, 
Commission on Human Rights, and various NGOs, on 
gender-sensitive and child-friendly handling of trafficking 
cases. 
 
The BI also conducted periodic training on basic immigration 
laws and procedures for immigration officers and agents in 
the field and other personnel involved in operations. 
Training on anti-trafficking in persons was in the 
Pre-Departure Orientation Seminar (PDOS) for consular staff, 
as well as Foreign Service officers and attaches en route to 
foreign missions.  ILO and the GRP's Foreign Service 
Institute (FSI) developed an anti-trafficking in persons 
training module.  The training module (in CD format) will 
benefit DFA Foreign Service officers who were unable to 
undergo anti-trafficking training through PDOS. 
 
H.  DFA, OWWA, and DSWD assisted repatriated Filipino workers 
who were victims of trafficking.  The OWWA's Halfway Home 
program provided temporary shelter, transport services, 
financial assistance, and counseling services through a 
network of NGOs.  The DSWD, working with DOLE and DOH, 
provided protective custody, recovery, and healing services 
for victims.  Services included organization of support 
groups, psychological and psychiatric interventions, medical, 
legal and livelihood services, provision of limited financial 
assistance, and educational assistance. 
 
I.  The vibrant local and international NGO community in the 
Philippines included many that work directly with trafficking 
victims.  The most active contributors included: 
 
-- Coalition Against Trafficking in Women - Asia Pacific 
(CATW-AP) is an international network of feminist groups, 
organizations, and individuals fighting the sexual 
exploitation of women.  The coalition brings attention to 
trafficking in women and girls, prostitution, pornography, 
sex tourism, and bride selling, mainly through media 
campaigns and policy advocacy.  It provides preventive 
education program on migration and trafficking at the 
community and grassroots level and conducts dialogues with 
government agencies such as the POEA, DOLE, and DSWD on 
preventive and curative measures.  Services include referring 
trafficking cases to member and partner organizations for 
legal, counseling and support services, and documentation of 
trafficking cases based on the Human Rights Information and 
Documentation System used by a global network of 
organizations concerned with human rights issues; 
 
-- VFF focuses on the promotion of child welfare, especially 
migrant working children, and is active on the issue of 
domestic trafficking of women and children.  It provides 
24-hour services for victims, including the operation of 
several temporary shelters, counseling, employment referrals, 
training, and advocacy.  Staff positioned at port arrival 
areas identify and intercept probable victims of trafficking 
as they disembark ships.  Through funding assistance from The 
Asia Foundation and the USG, VFF spearheaded the creation of 
MSNAT, a national network committed to provide immediate and 
appropriate response mechanisms to prevent trafficking, 
investigate and prosecute offenders, and protect, rescue, 
recover, and reintegrate victims, especially women and 
children; 
 
-- TUCP is the largest trade union network in the 
Philippines.  The TUCP forges coalitions with various labor 
groups in its efforts to promote and protect the rights and 
 
MANILA 00000688  017 OF 018 
 
 
welfare of workers and other disadvantaged groups, including 
women, youth and children, and migrant workers.  Its Women's 
Bureau is particularly active in anti-trafficking 
initiatives, such as public information and media campaigns, 
database collection and documentation, provision of legal 
assistance to victims, and networking.  With funding support 
from the American Center for International Labor Solidarity 
and the USG, TUCP conducted an anti-trafficking project 
establishing a coalition of private sector organizations that 
will coordinate with the government to ensure the 
implementation of activities on trafficking in persons; 
 
-- ACILS, active in the Philippines since 1969, has an 
extensive network with the GRP, NGOs, trade unions, academia, 
and the business community.  ACILS addresses labor issues, 
including irregular migration and trafficking in persons.  In 
2003, ACILS established a multi-sectoral Technical Working 
Group (TWG) to assist trafficking victims, monitor 
trafficking developments, process inquiries and complaints, 
and initiate filing of trafficking cases.  TWG is composed of 
37 organizations including 18 national government agencies, 
and 19 trade union, NGOs, and advocacy groups; 
 
-- Development Action for Women Network (DAWN) addresses the 
concerns of Filipino women migrants in Japan as well as the 
growing number of Japanese-Filipino children (JFCs).  Almost 
90 percent of Filipino OFWs in Japan are female entertainers, 
making them vulnerable to trafficking and sexual 
exploitation.  In coordination with its DAWN-Japan 
volunteers, the local branch assists JFCs abandoned by their 
Japanese fathers; 
 
-- Women's Legal Bureau (WLB) is a feminist legal NGO 
composed of lawyers, academics, and members of other 
professions.  It provides legal services to victim and 
survivors of violence against women and conducts education 
and information campaigns to raise public awareness on 
women's issues.  Other programs include representation of 
women in judicial proceedings, training of law enforcers and 
members of the legal profession on gender sensitivity, 
empowering communities to respond to feminist issues 
especially those involving violence against women, and 
working with women's groups toward promoting human rights; 
 
-- Third World Movement Against the Exploitation of Women 
(TWMAEW) addresses the needs of children and women in 
prostitution and other victims of sexual exploitation through 
shelters and support centers.  It offers skills training, 
livelihood assistance, and psycho-social intervention.  In 
collaboration with UNICEF and DepEd, it conducted 
awareness-raising campaigns on sexual abuse for 13,291 
elementary school pupils.  Social workers, educators, and 
survivors of sexual abuse facilitated the workshops; 
 
-- Kanlungan Center Foundation (KCF) works with OFWs and 
their families in addressing the problems of migrant workers. 
 It provides legal and welfare assistance, psycho-social 
counseling, temporary shelter, and education and training. 
Courses include Basic Migrants, Orientation, Migrant Rights, 
Legal Remedies, and Gender Awareness and Sensitivity. 
Kanlungan also intervenes at the grassroots level and 
addresses the psycho-social and economic causes and effects 
of migration by forging partnerships with other organizations 
at the community level; 
 
-- End Child Prostitution, Child Pornography and the 
Trafficking of Children for Sexual Purposes (ECPAT) campaigns 
to raise general public awareness in tourism, the travel 
industry, and high-risk communities on the issue of children 
victims of sexual abuse and commercial sexual exploitation. 
ECPAT is a member of the Special Committee for the Protection 
of Children under the DOJ and works with local government 
units in major provinces and cities, other NGOs, and 
church-based organizations. 
 
 
MANILA 00000688  018 OF 018 
 
 
============================================= ============= 
Heroes and Best Practices -- International Justice Mission 
============================================= ============= 
 
6.  (U) Our nominees for "Heroes" and "Best Practices" follow: 
 
Anti-Trafficking Hero Nomination for 2007: 
 
Patricia (&Patty8) Sison-Arroyo is a brilliant, tireless, 
advocate against human trafficking in the Philippines and 
regularly pressures the government to improve its prosecution 
of human traffickers.  She currently serves as IJM Executive 
Director in the Philippines, and in this capacity, she 
administers a U.S. Government-sponsored project to prosecute 
cases on behalf of trafficking victims.  Attorney 
Sison-Arroyo's support in both public and private spheres of 
the legal battle against trafficking have been critical to 
moving the anti-TIP agenda forward in the Philippines. 
Embassy Manila recognized Attorney Sison-Arroyo's significant 
contributions to the anti-TIP efforts in the Philippines by 
awarding her the 2006 Benigno Aquino Fellow for Public 
Service.  Through this fellowship, she traveled to several 
U.S. cities to meet with American anti-TIP experts. 
 
Anti-Trafficking Best Practices: 
 
IJM continued to lead the non-governmental efforts to 
prosecute human traffickers in the Philippines.  Although IJM 
investigations have not yet led to any convictions, IJM's 
private prosecutors were handling 23 separate criminal court 
cases in conjunction with their GRP counterparts.  Since IJM 
started operations in the Philippines in 2001, IJM has 
successfully rescued more than 100 children who were victims 
of sexual exploitation, including alleged TIP victims.  IJM 
has also provided information to police leading to closure of 
numerous bars that were employing and sexually exploiting 
minor and adult victims of trafficking. 
 
In February 2007, IJM began a training program with the 
National Bureau of Investigation that can only be viewed as a 
&best practice.8  In a week-long session with selected NBI 
investigators, IJM not only trained the participants on the 
investigative techniques under the 2003 anti-TIP law, but it 
also conducted and led joint operations against two 
metro-Manila area bars, suspected of trafficking minors.  IJM 
and NBI investigators conducted surveillance and raided the 
two suspected bars, rescued 11 minors, and filed the 
appropriate complaints with the DOJ against the bar owners 
and employees.  Embassy Manila congratulates IJM on its 
tireless efforts as an NGO to improve the law enforcement and 
prosecutorial abilities of the GRP to combat trafficking in 
persons. 
KENNEY