This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

261138Z Jul 05

UNCLAS PARIS 005149 
 
SIPDIS 
 
FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KMPI IS XF UNESCO
SUBJECT:  USUNESCO: UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 
CIVIL SOCIETY IN SUPPORT OF MIDDLE EAST PEACE HELD AT UNESCO 
HEADQUARTERS JULY 12-13 
 
 
¶1. Summary. The United Nations International Conference on Civil 
Society in Support of Middle East Peace was held at UNESCO 
headquarters July 12-13.  The conference was organized by the UN 
Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the 
Palestinian People and was invited by UNESCO to hold its meeting 
at UNESCO headquarters.  The tendentious meeting castigated 
Israel for human rights violations and cast the United States as 
an accomplice in Israel's actions.  Words like apartheid, 
divestment and boycott were used extensively over the two days. 
There was no Israeli representation at the meeting. End summary. 
 
¶2. The plenary was chaired by Sergei Ordzhonikidze, Director- 
General of the UN Office in Geneva and Representative of the 
Secretary General.  The keynote speech was given by an American, 
 
SIPDIS 
Phyllis Bennis, co-chair of the International Coordinating 
Network for Palestine.  Bennis' speech was harshly critical of 
both the Israeli and US governments. 
 
¶3. A series of workshops were held over the two days.  One 
workshop stressed the failure of the international community to 
respond to the call for effective international pressure against 
Israel - i.e. a sustained economic boycott or international 
sanctions.  The workshop included a power point presentation 
entitled "Boycott as Civil Resistance - The Moral Dimension: 
Closing the Door to Justice" by Omar Barghouti, an independent 
Palestinian political analyst for the Palestinian Campaign for 
the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (Jerusalem). 
Barghouti called for divestments and boycotts against Israel, for 
constructive and ethical dialogue, and for de-colonization. 
"Boycott," he said, "is moral resistance." 
 
¶4.  In another workshop, Luisa Sirvent, Secretary-General of the 
Spanish Federation for the Defence and Promotion of Human Rights, 
provided an overall picture of what is involved in engaging 
governments.  The points she highlighted were: 
 
-- That Palestine is a wholly occupied territory in which Israel 
has absolute power. 
-- That Israel is in violation of international law (ICJ advisory 
opinion, Geneva IV). 
-- That the Israeli government is engaged in a PR campaign aimed 
at Western governments that seeks to shift the focus of the 
international community away from the situation in Palestine. 
-- That the governments of EU member states continue to receive 
Israeli leaders, sign agreements and continue trade with Israel. 
As long as the U.S. maintains a strategic alliance with Israel, 
EU states are reluctant to take any action further than issuing 
statements condemning the situation. 
 
¶5. There were numerous other workshops, most along similar lines. 
We did notice that Rema Jaous Imseis, Legal Officer from the 
Office of the UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace 
Process (UNSCO) during a workshop on working with the UN said 
that pressure needs to be put on the Palestine Authority for more 
transparency. 
 
¶6. During the second plenary session, the final recommendations 
of all the workshops were reported.  These included: 
 
--  Consolidating opposition to the occupation with anti-war 
groups. 
--  The need for NGOs and the UN need to work against racism. 
--  The use of boycotts, divestments and sanctions against Israel 
until it complies with international law. 
--  Creation of an international tribunal for Palestine. 
 
¶7.  Comment.  We note sadly that this meeting was held the same 
day a suicide bomber killed two young Israelis in front of a 
shopping center and to our knowledge this was not mentioned 
during the meetings.  The tone of this meeting stands in sharp 
contrast to the way Israeli-Palestinian issues have been treated 
during the last two years at UNESCO.  The "UNESCO model" for 
dialogue has been held up as a way forward to resolve some of the 
more difficult issues in UN fora.  This model relies on dialogue 
and goodwill, something clearly missing during the international 
conference.  We also note that the Anti-Defamation league issued 
a press release on July 15 that condemned the meeting and called 
for the abolition of the Committee on the Exercise of the 
Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People.  End Comment. 
 
OLIVER