Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04PRETORIA5286, SOUTH AFRICAN RESPONSE ON PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04PRETORIA5286.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04PRETORIA5286 2004-12-07 14:17 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Pretoria
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS PRETORIA 005286 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: SENV ENRG EAID ECON SF
SUBJECT: SOUTH AFRICAN RESPONSE ON PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL 
ORGANIZATION 
 
 
REF: STATE 246829 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED; PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. 
 
1. (SBU) Embassy conveyed reftel points to officials at 
Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) and 
Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA).  According to DEAT's 
Director for International Relations, Zaheer Fakir, his 
Department was invited but never participated in discussions 
regarding future governance of UNEP, and DEAT does not 
support the French proposal. 
 
2. (SBU) DFA Multilateral Branch's Deputy Director for 
Conservation Elize Haber told EST Officer that South 
Africa's Ambassador to Nairobi attended the Stockholm 
meetings, which focused on UNEP's governing body rather than 
creation of a UN Environment Organization (UNEO).  She noted 
that in light of South Africa's strong interest in UN 
reform, it remains open to discussion with France about its 
proposal.  At present South Africa is unconvinced of the 
merits of transforming UNEP to a UNEO.  The SAG believes the 
current governance structure works well.  It shares USG 
concerns about the potential effectiveness of UNEO and the 
financial impact of creating UNEO, particularly on 
developing countries.  In addition, South Africa is 
concerned about a possible move of any new organization from 
Nairobi to a location outside Africa.  Haber also commented 
that her DEAT colleague did not appear to have complete 
information about the issue. 
 
FRAZER