VZCZCXRO7975
OO RUEHAO
DE RUEHC #1229/01 1640044
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 130019Z JUN 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE IMMEDIATE 5483
RUEHAO/AMCONSUL CURACAO IMMEDIATE 5932

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 07 STATE 061229 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KTIP ELAB KCRM KPAO KWMN PGOV PHUM PREL SMIG NL NT
SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS AND NETHERLANDS ANTILLES -- 2009 TIP 
REPORT: PRESS GUIDANCE AND DEMARCHE 
 
REF: A. (A) STATE 59732 
     ¶B. (B) STATE 005577 
 
¶1. This is an action cable; see paras 5 through 7 and 10. 
 
¶2. On June 16, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. EDT, the Secretary will 
release the 2009 Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report at a 
press conference in the Department's press briefing room. 
This release will receive substantial coverage in domestic 
and foreign news outlets.  Until the time of the Secretary's 
June 16 press conference, any public release of the Report or 
country narratives contained therein is prohibited. 
 
¶3. The Department is hereby providing Post with advance press 
guidance to be used on June 16 or thereafter.  Also provided 
is demarche language to be used in informing the Governments 
of the Netherlands and the Netherlands Antilles of their tier 
rankings and the TIP Report's imminent release.  The text of 
the TIP Report country narrative is provided, both for use in 
informing the Governments of the Netherlands and the 
Netherlands Antilles and in any local media release by Post's 
public affairs section on June 16 or thereafter.  Drawing on 
information provided below in paras 8 and 9, Post may provide 
the host government with the text of the TIP Report narrative 
no earlier than 1200 noon local time Monday June 15 for WHA, 
AF, EUR, and NEA countries and OOB local time Tuesday June 16 
for SCA and EAP posts.  Please note, however, that any public 
release of the Report's information should not/not precede 
the Secretary's release at 10:00 am EDT on June 16. 
 
¶4. The entire TIP Report will be available on-line at 
www.state.gov/g/tip shortly after the Secretary's June 16 
release.  Hard copies of the Report will be pouched to posts 
in all countries appearing on the Report.  The Secretary's 
statement at the June 16 press event, and the statement of 
and fielding of media questions by G/TIP,s Director and 
Senior Advisor to the Secretary, Ambassador-at-Large Luis 
CdeBaca, will be available on the Department's website 
shortly after the June 16 event.  Ambassador de Baca will 
also hold a general briefing for officials of foreign 
embassies in Washington DC on June 17 at 3:30 pm EDT. 
 
¶5. Action Request: No earlier than 12 noon local time on 
Monday June 15 for WHA, AF, EUR, and NEA posts and OOB local 
time on Tuesday June 16 for SCA and EAP posts, please inform 
the appropriate official in the Governments of the 
Netherlands and the Netherlands Antilles of the June 16 
release of the 2009 TIP Report, drawing on the points in para 
9 (at Post's discretion) and including the text of the 
country narrative provided in para 8.  For countries where 
the State Department has lowered the tier ranking, it is 
particularly important to advise governments prior to the 
Report being released in Washington on June 16. 
 
¶6. Action Request continued:  Please note that, for those 
countries which will not receive an "action plan" with 
specific recommendations for improvement, posts should draw 
host governments' attention to the areas for improvement 
identified in the 2009 Report, especially highlighted in the 
"Recommendations" section of the second paragraph of the 
narrative text.  This engagement is important to establishing 
the framework in which the government's performance will be 
judged for the 2010 Report.  If posts have questions about 
which governments will receive an action plan, or how they 
may follow up on the recommendations in the 2009 Report, 
please contact G/TIP and the appropriate regional bureau. 
 
¶7. Action Request continued: On June 16, please be prepared 
to answer media inquiries on the Report's release using the 
press guidance provided in para 11.  If Post wishes, a local 
press statement may be released on or after 10:30 am EDT June 
16, drawing on the press guidance and the text of the TIP 
Report's country narrative provided in para 8. 
 
¶8. Begin Final Text of the Netherlands and the Netherlands 
Antilles,s country narratives in the 2009 TIP Report: 
 
-------------------------------- 
THE NETHERLANDS(TIER 1) 
The Netherlands is a source, transit, and destination country 
for men, women, and children trafficked for the purposes of 
commercial sexual exploitation and forced labor.  During 
2008, most female victims were exploited in forced 
prostitution, and the majority of identified sex trafficking 
victims were from the Netherlands.  Within the Netherlands, 
victims are trafficked by so called &pimp boys8 or &lover 
boys8*men who seduce vulnerable young women and girls and 
 
STATE 00061229  002 OF 007 
 
 
force them into prostitution. During the reporting period, 
women were also trafficked from Asia, Africa, other parts of 
Europe, and the Western Hemisphere; the most common countries 
of origin for foreign female trafficking victims were China, 
Nigeria, Hungary, and Sierra Leone.  Males were trafficked 
into commercial sexual exploitation as well as forced labor 
in the catering, cleaning, agriculture and construction 
sectors.   The main countries of origin for male victims were 
China, India, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, and the Netherlands. 
According to the Dutch National Rapporteur for Trafficking in 
Persons, the highest risk sectors for labor trafficking are 
domestic employment, temporary employment agencies, 
agriculture and horticulture, restaurants, hotels, and 
construction.  Groups vulnerable to trafficking include 
single underage asylum seekers, women with dependent 
residence status obtained through fraudulent marriages, and 
women recruited in Africa, China, and Thailand for work in 
massage parlors. 
The Government of the Netherlands fully complies with the 
minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking.  The 
government sustained strong anti-sex trafficking law 
enforcement efforts, sustained protections provided to female 
trafficking victims, and improved services available to male 
trafficking victims.  It also expanded prevention activities, 
including a program targeted at raising trafficking awareness 
among clients of the sex trade. 
Recommendations for the Netherlands:  Vigorously investigate 
and prosecute, and convict and punish labor trafficking 
offenders; enhance forced labor awareness training for 
prosecutors and judges; continue anti-trafficking awareness 
initiatives aimed at educating clients of the commercial sex 
trade as well as beneficiaries of forced labor about the 
causes and consequences of trafficking; continue efforts to 
proactively identify trafficking victims in the prostitution 
and relevant labor sectors of the Netherlands. 
Prosecution 
The government demonstrated progress in investigating and 
prosecuting sex trafficking offenses, though its prosecutions 
of labor trafficking offenses diminished.  Since January 
2005, the Netherlands has prohibited all forms of trafficking 
through Criminal Code Article 273, which prescribes penalties 
for any form of trafficking of six to 15 years, 
imprisonment, with fines of up to $58,000. These penalties 
are sufficiently stringent and commensurate with those 
prescribed for other grave crimes.  There were no new labor 
trafficking prosecutions or convictions during the reporting 
period, compared with five during the previous reporting 
period.  The government prosecuted 221 persons for human 
trafficking offences in 2007, the last year for which 
comprehensive statistics are available, compared to 216 
during the previous year.  In 2007, verdicts were handed down 
in 120 cases, 81 percent of which resulted in convictions, 12 
percent resulted in acquittals, and 7 percent were dismissed. 
 According to the National Rapporteur's office, average 
prison sentences imposed in 2007 ranged from 20 to 23 months, 
down from 27 months in 2006.  The police included a module on 
trafficking as part of standard police training curriculum. 
The Netherlands, Netherlands Antilles, and Aruba signed a 
memorandum of understanding on increasing cooperation in 
combating human trafficking. 
 
Protection 
The Dutch government made increased efforts to protect 
trafficking victims during the reporting period.  Dutch 
authorities provided a temporary residence mechanism to allow 
foreign trafficking victims and witnesses to stay in the 
Netherlands during a reflection period of three months and, 
separately, during the investigation and prosecution of their 
traffickers.  During these periods, the government provided 
victims with legal, financial, and psychological assistance, 
including shelter (in facilities that also serve victims of 
domestic violence), medical care, social security benefits, 
and education financing.  Child victims had access to a full 
range of specialized services.  The government opened four 
new shelters specifically equipped to assist male victims of 
human trafficking during the reporting period.  The 
government provided permanent residence status to some 
victims, based on particular conditions.  The government 
encouraged victims to press charges against traffickers and 
to assist in prosecutions.  Nevertheless, victims were often 
reluctant to assist law enforcement personnel, due to fear of 
reprisals from traffickers.  In 2008, the national victim 
registration center identified and registered 826 trafficking 
victims, including 46 males, compared with 716 identified 
victims in 2007.  The Justice Ministry took measures to 
prevent victims from being punished for unlawful acts 
committed as a direct result of being trafficked, including 
through training of prison staff on proactive victim 
identification.  Police and prosecutors provided specialized 
training to help judges, labor inspectors, and immigration 
officers identify and assist trafficking victims during the 
reporting period.  Local governments were responsible for 
 
STATE 00061229  003 OF 007 
 
 
regulating legalized prostitution sectors and for conducting 
anti-trafficking inspections of brothels in these sectors. 
The Hague,s vice squad checked sex establishments at least 
six times during the reporting period; the Amsterdam vice 
squad inspected brothels at least four times.  The 
inspections included observation for any signals of 
trafficking, informal interviews with persons in 
prostitution, and the review of residence and work permits. 
 
Prevention 
The government demonstrated some progress in preventing 
trafficking during the year.  In February 2009, the 
government introduced an information card entitled 
"exploitation at the workplace" that was made available to 
all municipalities and social welfare agencies during the 
reporting period.   The card provides examples of labor 
exploitation, information on where to seek help, and details 
on victims' rights in several languages.  The Justice 
Ministry funded the "Meld M" multimedia campaign, targeted at 
clients of the sex trade and persons in prostitution, as well 
as residents, shopkeepers and taxi-drivers in areas where 
prostitution occurs.  The campaign encouraged people to 
report suspicions of trafficking to an anonymous hotline.  In 
December 2008, the Interior and Justice Ministers released a 
draft act containing new regulations for legalized 
prostitution; the regulations reportedly would boost efforts 
to counter sex trafficking.  The Ministry of Foreign Affairs 
funded $2.5 million for anti-trafficking programs in 
trafficking source countries in Europe, the Caribbean, Asia, 
and Africa.  The National Rapporteur for Trafficking in 
Persons in July 2008 published its sixth report, which is 
available on the Justice Ministry,s website.  Since January 
2008, the government provided single underage asylum seekers 
with intensive counseling in secured shelters to protect them 
against traffickers.  The Foreign Ministry website includes 
travel information warning Dutch travelers that sex with 
children is prosecutable in the country of destination as 
well as in the Netherlands.  The government funds several 
initiatives to prevent child sex tourism including a project 
to assist tour operators in Cambodia, Thailand, and 
Philippines to adopt and implement a code of conduct aimed at 
preventing child sex tourism.  The Justice Ministry estimates 
several dozen convictions annually in the Netherlands of 
Dutch residents found guilty of child sex tourism offenses 
abroad.  The Dutch military provided training to all military 
personnel on the prevention of trafficking and additional 
training on recognizing trafficking victims for Dutch troops 
being deployed abroad for duty as international peacekeepers. 
--------------------------------------------- ----------- 
The Netherlands Antilles (Tier 2 Watch List)* 
* *Footnote: The Netherlands Antilles is a semi-autonomous 
entity within the Kingdom of the Netherlands.  The Kingdom 
Charter divides responsibility among the three co-equal parts 
of the Kingdom based on jurisdiction and matter.  For the 
purpose of this report, the Netherlands Antilles is not a 
&country8 to which the minimum standards for the 
elimination of trafficking in the Trafficking Victims 
Protection Act apply.  This narrative reflects how the 
Antilles would be assessed if it were a separate, independent 
country. 
The five islands of the current Netherlands Antilles are a 
transit and destination point for men and women from 
Colombia, Venezuela, Suriname, Cuba, the Dominican Republic 
and other parts of South America and the Caribbean, 
trafficked for the purposes of commercial sexual exploitation 
and forced labor.  The women in prostitution in the 
Netherlands Antilles, regulated and illegal sex trades are 
highly vulnerable to human trafficking.  Credible reports 
have alleged the trafficking of over 100 Cuban construction 
workers employed by the Curacao Dry Dock Company in 2006*a 
case that garnered significant international press during the 
reporting period as a result of a related civil case in a 
U.S. court.  Local authorities believe that men and women 
have also been trafficked into local domestic servitude as 
well as into the agriculture and construction industries. 
Groups vulnerable to labor trafficking include Haitian males 
in the agriculture and gardening sectors and Latin American 
and Caribbean males in construction. There is anecdotal 
evidence that some Middle Eastern and Asian migrants in 
restaurants and local businesses may be vulnerable to debt 
bondage. 
The Government of the Netherlands Antilles does not fully 
comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of 
trafficking; however, it is making significant efforts to do 
so.  Despite these overall efforts, the government is placed 
on Tier 2 Watch List.  The government has not enacted 
anti-trafficking legislation, although during the reporting 
period legislation was introduced, processed and awaits final 
action.  The government also did not develop and fund victim 
assistance policies and programs or raise awareness among 
clients of the sex trade and beneficiaries of forced labor 
about the causes and consequences of human trafficking.   As 
 
STATE 00061229  004 OF 007 
 
 
noted above in the Netherlands narrative, in January 2009 the 
justice ministers of the Netherlands Antilles, the 
Netherlands, and Aruba signed a memorandum of understanding 
to promote increased anti-trafficking cooperation. 
Recommendations for the Netherlands Antilles:  Enact 
legislation criminalizing all forms of human trafficking; 
vigorously prosecute and convict sex and labor trafficking 
offenders throughout the Netherlands Antilles; establish 
formal procedures to guide officials in the proactive 
identification of trafficking victims and referral of these 
victims to service providers; consider ways to educate 
clients of the sex trade and beneficiaries of forced labor 
about the causes and consequences of trafficking. 
Prosecution 
The Netherlands Antilles, anti-trafficking law enforcement 
efforts were greatly hindered by the absence of specific 
anti- trafficking legislation.   A draft amendment to the 
Netherlands Antilles penal code prohibiting trafficking for 
sexual exploitation and forced labor remained pending in the 
Antillean Parliament during the reporting period.  There were 
two likely cases of human trafficking that officials in St. 
Maarten prosecuted using statutes prohibiting other 
non-trafficking offenses.  In May 2008, a man who had held 
three women in a brothel against their will was convicted and 
sentenced to 36 months in prison for human smuggling and 
ill-treatment.  Another man was detained briefly on 
allegations of keeping a household servant locked in his 
house.  A court required the man to pay the domestic 
servant,s outstanding wages and the costs associated with 
the servant,s repatriation.  Antillean authorities 
cooperated with Suriname,s request that the Dutch extradite 
several traffickers who fled to Curacao during a 
trafficking-related law enforcement action.   Funding for and 
staffing of police and judicial offices remained a chronic 
problem in the Netherlands Antilles.  Local media reported on 
corruption related to the issuance of immigration and work 
permits, though these did not involve specific trafficking 
allegations.  The government provided training to individual 
prosecutors and members of the islands, police departments 
and has systematic anti-trafficking training in place for law 
enforcement authorities. 
 
Protection 
The government,s victim protection efforts were mostly ad 
hoc during the reporting period.  Trafficking victims 
received limited assistance through a combination of 
government agencies and NGOs that receive some government 
subsidies in the Netherlands Antilles, including the Bureau 
for Aid to Victims in Curacao and the Women,s Desk in St. 
Maarten.  There were no specific trafficking victim health 
care facilities in the Netherlands Antilles, but government 
health care providers were available to assist trafficking 
victims.  The legal system allows witnesses to trafficking 
crimes to provide anonymous testimony or testimony from 
abroad.  Island governors had the authority to issue 
temporary residency status for trafficking victims; it is 
unknown if any were issued.  The government does provide 
long-term shelter for trafficking victims.  In practice, 
consulates representing source countries often handled 
assistance to and repatriation of their citizens.  The 
government does not employ formal procedures to guide 
officials in proactive victim identification among vulnerable 
groups, such as women in government-regulated prostitution 
zones, and to guide officials in referring victims to 
available service providers.  Curacao has one legal, 
government regulated brothel compound with approximately 90 
foreign women in prostitution.  International organizations 
have expressed strong concern about the working conditions -- 
including possible involuntary servitude at this brothel. 
The government did not train health officials charged with 
regulating the Curacao brothel on identifying trafficking 
indicators and referring suspected victims for assistance. 
The justice ministry reiterated a directive in 2008 
prohibiting immigration officials from holding the passports 
of foreign women entering the islands for the purpose of 
legal prostitution. One official in Curacao reported that 
some officials practiced proactive identification measures 
within detention facilities.  There were no reported cases of 
victims being penalized during the reporting period for 
crimes that were a direct result of being trafficked.  The 
government espoused a policy of encouraging trafficking 
victims to participate in investigations and prosecutions of 
trafficking offenders, but officials acknowledged that many 
victims were reluctant to participate. 
 
Prevention 
The government made some efforts to raise awareness of human 
trafficking during the reporting period but did not undertake 
any measures to reduce the demand for commercial sex acts. 
Formal interagency anti-trafficking working groups operated 
in Bonaire, Curacao, Saba, St. Eustatius, and St. Maarten 
during the reporting period.  The anti-trafficking 
 
STATE 00061229  005 OF 007 
 
 
coordinator based in Curacao spoke out about the problem of 
human trafficking in the region and continued to promote an 
IOM-developed public awareness campaign.  The 
anti-trafficking coordinator in Curacao also arranged for a 
short awareness raising documentary video to be aired on 
local television stations.   Netherlands Antilles officials 
issued a contract for an outside evaluation of their 
anti-trafficking strategy in 2008.  The government provided 
in-kind support for two human trafficking hotlines in the 
Netherlands Antilles. There were no awareness campaigns 
specifically targeting potential clients of the sex trade or 
beneficiaries of forced labor in the Netherlands Antilles. 
 
-------------------------------- 
 
 
¶9. Post may wish to deliver the following points, which offer 
technical and legal background on the TIP Report process, to 
the host government as a non-paper with the above TIP Report 
country narrative: 
 
(begin non-paper) 
 
-- The U.S. Congress, through its passage of the 2000 
Trafficking Victims Protection Act, as amended (TVPA), 
requires the Secretary of State to submit an annual Report to 
Congress.  The goal of this Report is to stimulate action and 
create partnerships around the world in the fight against 
modern-day slavery.  The USG approach to combating human 
trafficking follows the TVPA and the standards set forth in 
the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in 
Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the 
United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized 
Crime (commonly known as the "Palermo Protocol").  The TVPA 
and the Palermo Protocol recognize that this is a crime in 
which the victims, labor or services (including in the "sex 
industry") are obtained or maintained through force, fraud, 
or coercion, whether overt or through psychological 
manipulation.  While much attention has focused on 
international flows, both the TVPA and the Palermo Protocol 
focus on the exploitation of the victim, and do not require a 
showing that the victim was moved. 
 
-- Recent amendments to the TVPA removed the requirement that 
only countries with a "significant number" of trafficking 
victims be included in the Report. Beginning with the 2009 
TIP Report, countries determined to be a country of origin, 
transit, or destination for victims of severe forms of 
trafficking are included in the Report and assigned to one of 
three tiers.  Countries assessed as meeting the "minimum 
standards for the elimination of severe forms of trafficking" 
set forth in the TVPA are classified as Tier 1.  Countries 
assessed as not fully complying with the minimum standards, 
but making significant efforts to meet those minimum 
standards are classified as Tier 2.  Countries assessed as 
neither complying with the minimum standards nor making 
significant efforts to do so are classified as Tier 3. 
 
-- The TVPA also requires the Secretary of State to provide a 
"Special Watch List" to Congress later in the year. 
Anti-trafficking efforts of the countries on this list are to 
be evaluated again in an Interim Assessment that the 
Secretary of State must provide to Congress by February 1 of 
each year.  Countries are included on the "Special Watch 
List" if they move up in "tier" rankings in the annual TIP 
Report -- from 3 to 2 or from 2 to 1 ) or if they have been 
placed on the Tier 2 Watch List. 
 
-- Tier 2 Watch List consists of Tier 2 countries determined: 
(1) not to have made "increasing efforts" to combat human 
trafficking over the past year; (2) to be making significant 
efforts based on commitments of anti-trafficking reforms over 
the next year, or (3) to have a very significant number of 
trafficking victims or a significantly increasing victim 
population.  As indicated in reftel B, the TVPRA of 2008 
contains a provision requiring that a country that has been 
included on Tier 2 Watch List for two consecutive years after 
the date of enactment of the TVPRA of 2008 be ranked as Tier 
¶3.  Thus, any automatic downgrade to Tier 3 pursuant to this 
provision would take place, at the earliest, in the 2011 TIP 
Report (i.e., a country would have to be ranked Tier 2 Watch 
List in the 2009 and 2010 Reports before being subject to 
Tier 3 in the 2011 Report).  The new law allows for a waiver 
of this provision for up to two additional years upon a 
determination by the President that the country has developed 
and devoted sufficient resources to a written plan to make 
significant efforts to bring itself into compliance with the 
minimum standards. 
 
-- Countries classified as Tier 3 may be subject to statutory 
restrictions for the subsequent fiscal year on 
non-humanitarian and non-trade-related foreign assistance 
 
STATE 00061229  006 OF 007 
 
 
and, in some circumstances, withholding of funding for 
participation by government officials or employees in 
educational and cultural exchange programs.   In addition, 
the President could instruct the U.S. executive directors to 
international financial institutions to oppose loans or other 
utilization of funds (other than for humanitarian, 
trade-related or certain types of development assistance) 
with respect to countries on Tier 3.  Countries classified as 
Tier 3 that take strong action within 90 days of the Report's 
release to show significant efforts against trafficking in 
persons, and thereby warrant a reassessment of their Tier 
classification, would avoid such sanctions.  Guidelines for 
such actions are in the DOS-crafted action plans to be shared 
by Posts with host governments. 
 
-- The 2009 TIP Report, issuing as it does in the midst of 
the global financial crisis, highlights high levels of 
trafficking for forced labor in many parts of the world and 
systemic contributing factors to this phenomenon:  fraudulent 
recruitment practices and excessive recruiting fees in 
workers, home countries; the lack of adequate labor 
protections in both sending and receiving countries; and the 
flawed design of some destination countries, "sponsorship 
systems" that do not give foreign workers adequate legal 
recourse when faced with conditions of forced labor.  As the 
May 2009 ILO Global Report on Forced Labor concluded, forced 
labor victims suffer approximately $20 billion in losses, and 
traffickers, profits are estimated at $31 billion.  The 
current global financial crisis threatens to increase the 
number of victims of forced labor and increase the associated 
"cost of coercion." 
 
-- The text of the TVPA and amendments can be found on 
website www.state.gov/g/tip. 
 
-- On June 16, 2009, the Secretary of State will release the 
ninth annual TIP Report in a public event at the State 
Department.  We are providing you an advance copy of your 
country's narrative in that report.  Please keep this 
information embargoed until 10:00 am Washington DC time June 
¶16.  The State Department will also hold a general briefing 
for officials of foreign embassies in Washington DC on June 
17 at 3:30 pm EDT. 
 
(end non-paper) 
 
¶10. Posts should make sure that the relevant country 
narrative is readily available on or though the Mission's web 
page in English and appropriate local language(s) as soon as 
possible after the TIP Report is released.  Funding for 
translation costs will be handled as it was for the Human 
Rights Report.  Posts needing financial assistance for 
translation costs should contact their regional bureau,s EX 
office. 
 
¶11. The following is press guidance provided for Posts to use 
with local media. 
 
Q1: Why was the Netherlands given a ranking of Tier 1? 
 
A:  The Government of the Netherlands fully complies with the 
minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking. 
 
Q2: What progress has the Netherlands made in the past year? 
A: The government sustained strong anti-sex trafficking law 
enforcement efforts, sustained protections provided to female 
trafficking victims, and improved services available to male 
trafficking victims.  It also expanded prevention activities, 
including a program targeted at raising trafficking awareness 
among clients of the sex trade. 
Q3: What can the Netherlands do to improve its fight against 
trafficking in persons? 
A:  To improve its anti-trafficking performance, the Dutch 
government could: vigorously investigate and prosecute, and 
convict and punish labor trafficking offenders; enhance 
forced labor awareness training for prosecutors and judges; 
continue anti-trafficking awareness initiatives aimed at 
educating clients of the commercial sex trade as well as 
beneficiaries of forced labor about the causes and 
consequences of trafficking; continue efforts to proactively 
identify trafficking victims in the prostitution and relevant 
labor sectors of the Netherlands. 
Netherlands Antilles (Tier 2 WL) 
Last Year Not Ranked 
 
Q1: What is Netherlands Antilles status in the TIP Report? 
 
A:  The Netherlands Antilles is a semi-autonomous entity 
within the Kingdom of the Netherlands.  The Kingdom Charter 
divides responsibility among the three co-equal parts of the 
Kingdom based on jurisdiction and matter.  For the purpose of 
this report, the Netherlands Antilles is not by definition a 
 
STATE 00061229  007 OF 007 
 
 
&country8 to which the minimum standards for the 
elimination of trafficking in the Trafficking Victims 
Protection Act apply.  The Report narrative reflects how the 
Antilles would be assessed if it were a separate, independent 
country. 
 
Q2: Why is the Netherlands Antilles assessed at Tier 2 Watch 
List? 
 
A:  The Government of the Netherlands Antilles does not fully 
comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of 
trafficking; however it is making significant efforts to do 
so.  The government has not enacted anti-trafficking 
legislation, although during the reporting period legislation 
was introduced, processed and awaits final action.  The 
government also did not develop and fund victim assistance 
policies and programs or raise awareness among clients of the 
sex trade and beneficiaries of forced labor about the causes 
and consequences of human trafficking. 
 
Q3: What progress did the Netherlands Antilles make in the 
last year? 
 
A: The government made some efforts to raise awareness of 
human trafficking during the reporting period.  Formal 
interagency anti-trafficking working groups operated in 
Bonaire, Curacao, Saba, St. Eustatius, and St. Maarten during 
the reporting period.  The anti-trafficking coordinator based 
in Curacao spoke out about the problem of human trafficking 
in the region and continued to promote an IOM-developed 
public awareness campaign.  The anti-trafficking coordinator 
in Curacao also arranged for a short awareness raising 
documentary video to be aired on local television stations. 
 
Q4: What can the Netherlands Antilles do to further the fight 
against trafficking in persons? 
 
A: To improve its anti-trafficking performance, the 
government should: enact legislation criminalizing all forms 
of human trafficking; vigorously prosecute and convict sex 
and labor trafficking offenders throughout the Netherlands 
Antilles; establish formal procedures to guide officials in 
the proactive identification of trafficking victims and 
referral of these victims to service providers; consider ways 
to educate clients of the sex trade and beneficiaries of 
forced labor about the causes and consequences of trafficking. 
 
Q5:  What sources does the State Department use for 
information? 
 
A: The Department of State prepared this Report using 
information from U.S. embassies, foreign government 
officials, NGOs and international organizations, published 
reports, research trips to every region, and information 
submitted to tipreport@state.gov. 
 
¶12. The Department appreciates posts, assistance with the 
preceding action requests. 
CLINTON