Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09STATE11917, COPUOS: GUIDANCE FOR THE U.S. DELEGATION TO THE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09STATE11917.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09STATE11917 2009-02-10 00:25 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED Secretary of State
VZCZCXYZ0005
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHC #1917 0410045
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O P 100025Z FEB 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA IMMEDIATE 0000
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 0000
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA PRIORITY 0000
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES PRIORITY 0000
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 0000
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 0000
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 0000
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 0000
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0000
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 0000
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 0000
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO PRIORITY 0000
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 0000
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 0000
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 0000
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0000
UNCLAS STATE 011917 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: TSPA UNGA UNCOPUOS AORC KNNP AU
SUBJECT: COPUOS: GUIDANCE FOR THE U.S. DELEGATION TO THE 
46TH SESSION OF THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL SUBCOMMITTEE 
FEBRUARY 9-20, 2009 
 
REF: A. 09 STATE 2007 
     B. 08 UNVIE 0111 
     C. 08 UNVIE 0113 
 
1. FOLLOWING IS GUIDANCE FOR THE USDEL TO THE 46TH SESSION 
OF THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL SUBCOMMITTEE (STSC) OF THE 
UN COMMITTEE ON THE PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE 
(COPUOS).  THIS SESSION OFFERS NEW POSSIBILITIES TO 
ADVANCE U.S. INTERESTS IN COPUOS AND ITS SUBCOMMITTEES. 
SINCE UNISPACE III IN 1999, THE WORK OF UNCOPUOS, AND 
PARTICULARLY THE STSC, HAS COMPLEMENTED A NUMBER OF USG 
PRIORITIES IN INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATION. COPUOS 
MEMBERS WILL CONTINUE TO DRAW UPON THE UNISPACE III REPORT 
AND ITS RECOMMENDATIONS, AND THE 2004 REPORT TO THE UNGA 
ON PROGRESS ACHIEVED IN IMPLEMENTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS 
OF UNISPACE III (A/59/174), IN FORMULATING PROPOSALS FOR 
NEW AGENDA ITEMS AND OTHER COPUOS-SPONSORED ACTIVITIES. 
USDEL SHOULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OPPORTUNITIES TO SHOW 
LINKAGES BETWEEN USG SPACE ACTIVITIES AND THE THEMES IN 
THESE REPORTS. 
 
2. SPACE APPLICATIONS PROGRAMME (SAP) AND IMPLEMENTATION 
OF UNISPACE III: 
 
3. GENERALLY, THE WORK OF THE SAP AND FOLLOW-UP TO 
UNISPACE III SHOULD REFLECT THE THEMES BELOW. USDEL SHOULD 
EVALUATE 
SUGGESTED FUTURE AREAS OF WORK ON THE BASIS OF THESE 
THEMES. 
 
-- BROADER PARTICIPATION IN ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE 
MONITORING AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE EARTH AND ITS 
ENVIRONMENT; 
 
-- BETTER USE OF EXISTING MECHANISMS FOR INTERNATIONAL 
COOPERATION, E.G., THE COMMITTEE ON EARTH OBSERVATION 
SATELLITES (CEOS), THE INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS 
COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC), AND THE GROUP ON EARTH 
OBSERVATIONS (GEO); 
 
-- DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION ON SPACE RESEARCH AREAS 
AND STRATEGIES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; 
 
-- IMPROVED COORDINATION AND LESS DUPLICATION AMONG UN 
ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN SPACE ACTIVITIES; 
 
-- STRENGTHENED REGIONAL SPACE COOPERATION; 
 
-- PROMOTION OF CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS AND USE 
OF OUTER SPACE; AND 
 
-- GREATER INVOLVEMENT OF YOUNG SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS, 
AS WELL AS INDUSTRY, IN SAP ACTIVITIES. 
 
-- THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT OTHER DELEGATIONS WILL 
COMMENT ON OR SEEK TO DISCUSS REVIEWING OR CHANGING THE UN 
PRINCIPLES RELATING TO REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM 
OUTER SPACE. IN THAT EVENT THE USDEL SHOULD STRESS THAT 
THE PRINCIPLES RELATING TO REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM 
OUTER SPACE ARE WORKING WELL AND DO NOT NEED TO BE 
REVIEWED OR CHANGED; AND THE USDEL MAY NOT SUPPORT ANY MOVE TO 
DISCUSS, STUDY, REVIEW OR CHANGE THE PRINCIPLES RELATING 
TO REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM OUTER SPACE. 
 
4. STSC CONSIDERATION OF SPACE SYSTEMS-BASED DISASTER 
MANAGEMENT SUPPORT:  AT ITS 2006 SESSION, THE STSC 
RECOMMENDED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE UN PLATFORM FOR 
SPACE-BASED INFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT AND 
EMERGENCY RESPONSE (SPIDER).  SPIDER WAS ENDORSED BY 
COPUOS AND THE UNGA AND HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AS A PROGRAM 
UNDER THE UN OFFICE OF OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS (UNOOSA) AND 
WILL REPORT TO AND RECEIVE GUIDANCE FROM COPUOS THROUGH 
UNOOSA.  SPIDER IS BEING DESIGNED TO PROVIDE ACCESS FOR 
ALL COUNTRIES AND RELEVANT INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS TO 
SPACE-BASED INFORMATION AND SERVICES RELEVANT TO DISASTER 
MANAGEMENT, TO SERVE AS A BRIDGE CONNECTING THE DISASTER 
MANAGEMENT AND SPACE COMMUNITIES, AND TO FACILITATE 
CAPACITY-BUILDING, PARTICULARLY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. 
 
THE PROGRAM IS INTENDED TO WORK CLOSELY WITH 
INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES SUCH AS THE GLOBAL EARTH 
OBSERVATION SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS, THE INTERNATIONAL CHARTER 
ON SPACE AND MAJOR DISASTERS, THE IAEA INCIDENT AND 
EMERGENCY CENTER, AND THE INTERNATIONAL STRATEGY FOR 
DISASTER REDUCTION IN ORDER TO AVOID DUPLICATION OF 
EFFORTS.  UNCOPUOS HAD AGREED THAT THE PROGRAM WAS TO BE 
SUPPORTED BY VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS AND THROUGH A 
REARRANGEMENT OF UNOOSA PRIORITIES.  THE U.S. JOINED 
CONSENSUS ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPIDER WITH THE 
UNDERSTANDING THAT THE ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED 
WITH SPIDER WOULD NOT, AS FAR AS POSSIBLE, HAVE A NEGATIVE 
IMPACT ON THE CURRENT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES OF UNOOSA NOR ON 
THE UN REGULAR BUDGET AS REFLECTED IN UNGA 61/110. HOWEVER 
AT THE 2007 UNGA, A RESOLUTION WAS PASSED CALLING FOR AN 
ADDITIONAL $600,000 FROM THE UN REGULAR BUDGET FOR SPIDER 
STAFF. THE U.S. DISASSOCIATED ITSELF FROM THE RESOLUTION 
AND MADE A STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD EXPRESSING OUR 
UNHAPPINESS WITH THE IMPACT ON THE BUDGET.  THE LANGUAGE 
IN OUR STATEMENT WAS SUPPORTED BY AUSTRIA AND GERMANY WITH 
COMPLICIT SUPPORT OF THE CHAIR, BRACHET.   AUSTRIA, CHINA, 
GERMANY, AND SWITZERLAND ARE PROVIDING DIRECT SUPPORT TO 
SPIDER.  WE HAVE STATED THAT USG AGENCIES RESPONSIBLE FOR 
DISASTER EARLY WARNING AND MITIGATION WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE 
RESOURCES TO SPIDER, BUT THAT THEIR PRODUCTS WILL BE MADE 
AVAILABLE AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN THE PAST IN RESPONSE TO 
DISASTER SITUATIONS. 
 
AT THIS SESSION, THE USDEL SHOULD: 
 
A. REITERATE THAT THE U.S. DOES NOT SUPPORT AN INCREASE IN 
THE BUDGET FOR SPIDER. 
 
B. REITERATE THAT USG AGENCIES RESPONSIBLE FOR DISASTER 
EARLY WARNING AND MITIGATION DO NOT PLAN TO CONTRIBUTE 
RESOURCES 
TO SPIDER, BUT THAT THEIR PRODUCTS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE, 
AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN THE PAST, IN RESPONSE TO DISASTER 
SITUATIONS. 
 
5. SOLAR TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS:  ON THE BASIS OF A U.S. 
PROPOSAL AT THE 2005 SESSION OF THE STSC, THE SUBCOMMITTEE 
CONSIDERED THE INTERNATIONAL HELIOPHYSICAL YEAR (IHY) 2007 
UNDER  A MULTI-YEAR WORK PLAN.  THE WORK PLAN WAS 
COMPLETED IN 2008, BUT THE SUBCOMMITTEE AGREED TO RETAIN 
THIS AS A SINGLE-ISSUE ITEM FOR DISCUSSSION IN 2009.  AT 
THIS SESSION, THERE WILL BE A REPORT BY THE IHY 
SECRETARIAT ON THE WRAP-UP OF IHY 2007 AND PLANS TO 
CONTINUE RESEARCH WITH IHY INSTRUMENTS.  UNDER THIS AGENDA 
ITEM, USDEL SHOULD PROPOSE THAT THE TOPIC OF SPACE WEATHER 
MONITORING AND FORECASTING REPLACE IHY 2007 AS A SINGLE 
ISSUE/ITEM FOR 2010 OR AS A MULTIYEAR AGENDA ITEM BASED ON 
A WORK PLAN PROPOSED BY NASA AND NOAA. 
 
6. SPACE DEBRIS:  AT ITS 44TH SESSION, THE SUBCOMMITTEE 
REACHED CONSENSUS ON A VOLUNTARY SET OF SPACE DEBRIS 
MITIGATION GUIDELINES BASED ON THE GUIDELINES PRODUCED BY 
THE INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE 
(IADC) IN 2002.  THESE STSC GUIDELINES WERE SUBSEQUENTLY 
ENDORSED BY COPUOS AND THE UNGA DURING THEIR 2007 
SESSIONS.  THIS YEAR, SPACE DEBRIS WILL CONTINUE AS A 
SINGLE ISSUE ITEM, WITH VOLUNTARY MEMBER STATE REPORTING 
ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SPACE DEBRIS GUIDELINES THROUGH 
NATIONAL MECHANISMS.  SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS ON THE STATE 
OF THE DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT AND UPDATES ON RESEARCH 
CONCERNING ORBITAL DEBRIS WILL BE GIVEN BY EXPERTS FROM 
NASA AND THE IADC. 
 
THE USDEL SHOULD: 
 
A. REQUEST THAT MEMBER STATES BEGIN VOLUNTARY ANNUAL 
REPORTING OF NATIONAL ACTIVITIES TO IMPLEMENT SPACE DEBRIS 
MITIGATION MEASURES; 
 
B. OPPOSE THE CREATION OR ADDITION OF LEGALLY BINDING 
MEASURES CONCERNING ORBITAL DEBRIS BY THE STSC, LSC, 
COPUOS, OR UNGA; AND 
 
C. OPPOSE THE CREATION OF UNGA PRINCIPLES ON ORBITAL 
DEBRIS. 
 
7. NUCLEAR POWER SOURCES IN SPACE:  AT ITS FORTY-FIFTH 
SESSION IN 2008, THE STSC CONTINUED WORK ON THE WORK PLAN 
TO DEVELOP, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE IAEA, A 
TECHNICALLY-BASED FRAMEWORK OF GOALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 
FOR THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR POWER SOURCE (NPS) APPLICATIONS 
IN OUTER SPACE (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE FRAMEWORK.) 
CONSISTENT WITH THE WORK PLAN, A JOINT EXPERTS GROUP (JEG) 
COMPRISING TECHNICAL EXPERTS FROM STSC MEMBER STATES, THE 
EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY AND IAEA MET TO DEVELOP A DRAFT 
SAFETY FRAMEWORK FOR REVIEW BY THE SUBCOMMITTEE AND THE 
IAEA.  THE JEG MET IN JUNE AND OCTOBER 2008 TO UPDATE THE 
DRAFT FRAMEWORK BASED ON COMMENTS FROM STSC MEMBER STATES, 
ESA AND THE IAEA.  A FINAL DRAFT OF THE FRAMEWORK WAS 
DEVELOPED BY THE JEG AT THE OCTOBER 2008 MEETING AND 
SUBMITTED TO THE OOSA SECRETARIAT FOR DISTRIBUTION PRIOR 
TO THE FEBRUARY 2009 MEETING. 
 
8. AT THIS STSC SESSION, THE USDEL SHOULD LEAD AN EFFORT 
TO ACHIEVE CONSENSUS WITHIN THE JEG FOR THE CHANGE 
SPECIFIED IN THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH.  ONCE THAT CHANGE 
HAS BEEN ADOPTED, THE USDEL SHOULD LEAD AN EFFORT TO 
ACHIEVE CONSENSUS WITHIN THE STSC NPS WORKING GROUP tTO 
HAVE THE CONSENSUS VERSION APPENDED TO THE NPS WORKING 
GROUP REPORT TO THE STSC WITH APPROPRIATE REPORT LANGUAGE 
THAT MAKES IT CLEAR THAT THE FRAMEWORK IS BEFORE THE STSC 
FOR APPROVAL AND FORWARDING TO THE IAEA.  AFTER THE STSC 
HAS APPROVED THE FRAMEWORK, IT WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE 
IAEA COMMISSION ON SAFETY STANDARDS FOR THEIR ENDORSEMENT 
AT THEIR UPCOMING APRIL 22-24, 2009, MEETING IN VIENNA. 
IF EITHER THE JEG OR STSC FAIL TO REACH CONSENSUS ON THE 
FRAMEWORK, THE USDEL WILL RECOMMEND THAT THE STATUS OF THE 
FRAMEWORK IS ADDRESSED DURING THE INTERSESSIONAL MEETING 
IN JUNE 2009. 
 
9. SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIED CAVEATS, THE USDEL WILL WORK 
IN THE JEG TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGE TO THE VERSION OF 
THE FRAMEWORK DISTRIBUTED BY THE OOSA SECRETARIAT PRIOR TO 
THE CURRENT STSC MEETING: 
 
      - TO ACHIEVE FRENCH AND EUROPEAN CONSENSUS ON THE 
FRAMEWORK, CHANGE THE WORDING OF THE PREFACE, SIXTH 
PARAGRAPH,LAST SENTENCE TO: &THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS 
FRAMEWORK TOOK INTO CONSIDERATION, BUT DOES NOT 
SUPPLEMENT, ALTER OR INTERPRET, RELEVANT CONVENTIONS, 
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND PRINCIPLES.8 
 
10. OTHER THAN THE CHANGE NOTED IN THE PREVIOUS PARAGRAPH, 
THE USDEL SHALL NOT AGREE TO ANY CHANGES TO THE CURRENT 
DRAFT OF THE FRAMEWORK THAT WOULD SUBSTANTIVELY ALTER THE 
CONTENT OF THE DOCUMENT OR BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE 
DRAFTING AND CONTENT GUIDELINES INCLUDED IN THE WORK PLAN 
(AND THE COUNTERPART IAEA DOCUMENT PREPARATION PROFILE). 
 
11.  BASED ON STSC MEMBER STATE REVIEW COMMENTS ON THE 
FRAMEWORK AND DISCUSSIONS HELD AT THE OCTOBER 2008 JEG 
MEETING, THE TOPICS LISTED BELOW COULD BE RAISED DURING 
THE FEBRUARY 2009 MEETING OF THE JEG AND/OR STSC NPS 
WORKING GROUP.  FOR EACH OF THE LISTED TOPICS, THE US DEL 
WILL SEEK TO ACHIEVE CONSENSUS WITHIN THE JEG AND STSC NPS 
WORKING GROUP ON THE DESIRED OUTCOME: 
 
A.  THE ROLE OF THE IAEA RELATIVE TO NPS ONCE THE 
FRAMEWORK IS APPROVED. 
      DESIRED OUTCOME: AGREEMENT THAT INTERNAL 
DELIBERATIONS WITHIN THE IAEA AND AMONG ITS MEMBER STATES, 
AND CONSULTATIONS WITH THE STSC WOULD BE NEEDED TO 
DETERMINE THE IAEA,S ROLE AFTER THE FRAMEWORK IS APPROVED. 
 
B.  THE ROLE OF THE COPUOS ONCE THE FRAMEWORK IS APPROVED. 
DESIRED OUTCOME: AGREEMENT THAT A NEW NPS WORKING GROUP 
WORK PLAN, APPROVED BY THE STSC, WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR 
ADDITIONAL WORK ON NPS BEYOND THAT OF THE CURRENT WORK 
PLAN. 
 
C.  THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE FRAMEWORK TO THE UN PRINCIPLES 
RELEVANT TO THE USE OF NUCLEAR POWER SOURCES IN OUTER 
SPACE (RESOLUTION 47/68 OF 14 DECEMBER 1992, AND HEREAFTER 
REFERRED TO AS &THE PRINCIPLES8). 
 
      DESIRED OUTCOME: AGREEMENT THAT THE FRAMEWORK IS 
AN INDEPENDENT MECHANISM THAT DELINEATES THE GOVERNMENTAL, 
MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL ELEMENTS THAT SHOULD COMPRISE A 
NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR IMPLEMENTING SAFE APPLICATIONS 
OF SPACE NPS AND, AS SUCH, SPECIFIES THE ELEMENTS REQUIRED 
BY NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS TO EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENT OTHER 
RELEVANT GUIDANCE, SUCH AS THAT FOUND IN THE PRINCIPLES. 
 
D.  APPLICATION OF THE FRAMEWORK TO COMMERCIAL AND DEFENSE 
MISSIONS. 
      DESIRED OUTCOME: AGREEMENT THAT THE FRAMEWORK IS 
APPLICABLE TO ALL PEACEFUL USES OF SPACE NPS. 
 
E.  THE RATIONALE FOR RESTRICTING THE APPLICATION OF THE 
FRAMEWORK TO THE PROTECTION OF PEOPLE AND ENVIRONMENTS ON 
EARTH. 
      DESIRED OUTCOME: AGREEMENT THAT WHILE A 
SUBSTANTIAL SCIENTIFIC BODY OF KNOWLEDGE EXISTS FOR 
ESTABLISHING A SPACE NPS APPLICATION SAFETY FRAMEWORK FOR 
PEOPLE AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN EARTH,S BIOSPHERE, 
COMPARABLE SCIENTIFIC DATA DOES NOT YET EXIST THAT WOULD 
PROVIDE A TECHNICALLY SOUND BASIS FOR DEVELOPING A SPACE 
NPS APPLICATION SAFETY FRAMEWORK FOR PROTECTING HUMANS IN 
THE UNIQUE CONDITONS IN SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTS OUTSIDE OF 
THE EARTH,S BIOSPHERE. 
 
F.    THE LACK OF MORE DETAILED DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT 
GUIDANCE IN SECTION 5.2 OF THE FRAMEWORK. 
      DESIRED OUTCOME: AGREEMENT THAT THE GUIDANCE 
PRESENTED IN THE FRAMEWORK FOR &SAFETY IN DESIGN AND 
DEVELOPMENT8 IS SUBSTANTIVE, AND CONSISTENT WITH BOTH THE 
GUIDANCE FOR FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT AS SPECIFIED IN THE 
WORK PLAN (AND IAEA DOCUMENT PREPARATION PROFILE) AND WITH 
THE LEVEL-OF-DETAIL FOUND IN AN IAEA SAFETY FUNADAMENTAL 
(A DOCUMENT AKIN TO THE FRAMEWORK). 
 
G.    THE ABSENCE OF A PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF 
NUCLEAR REACTORS IN EARTH ORBIT. 
      DESIRED OUTCOME: AGREEMENT THAT THE FRAMEWORK IS 
NON-BINDING AND PROVIDES A SET OF TOP LEVEL BEST PRACTICES 
FOR DEVELOPING A SAFETY CULTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE WITHIN 
A SPACE PROGRAM; AS SUCH, IT IS INTENDED TO BE UTILIZED AS 
A GUIDE FOR NATIONAL PURPOSES AND IS INTENDED TO APPLY TO 
ALL SPACE NPS APPLICATIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE.  CONSISTENT 
WITH THE WORK PLAN FOR THE FRAMEWORK THAT WAS ADOPTED BY 
THE STSC NPS WORKING GROUP, &THE SAFETY FRAMEWORK SHOULD 
BE GENERAL AND QUALITATIVE IN NATURE, TECHNICALLY VALID 
AND RELATIVELY INDEPENDENT OF EVOLVING TECHNOLOGY. THE 
GUIDELINES SET FORTH IN THE FRAMEWORK SHOULD REFLECT BROAD 
INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS8 (REF:  (A/AC.105/C.1/L289, 
DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTERNATIONAL TECHNICALLY BASED 
FRAMEWORK OF GOALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE SAFETY OF 
PLANNED AND CURRENTLY FORESEEABLE NUCLEAR POWER SOURCE 
APPLICATIONS IN OUTER SPACE, 27 DECEMBER 20068). 
MOREOVER, IF SPACE REACTORS WERE EXCLUDED FROM THIS 
FRAMEWORK, THEN NO ASPECT OF THE FRAMEWORK WOULD APPLY TO 
SPACE REACTOR APPLICATIONS ) A RESULT THAT WOULD RUN 
COUNTER TO ASSURING THE SAFETY OF SPACE NPS. 
 
12.   IF THE FRAMEWORK IS APPROVED BY THE STSC, THEN 
THE USDEL CAN AGREE TO CONSIDERATION OF A NEW NPS WORK 
PLAN IN 2010.  THE USDEL CAN SUPPORT HOLDING A WORKSHOP ) 
AGAIN INVOLVING THE STSC AND IAEA ) TO DISCUSS THE 
POTENTIAL RANGE OF TECHNICAL TOPICS THAT THE NPS WORKING 
GROUP COULD PURSUE GIVEN THAT THE FRAMEWORK HAS BEEN 
APPROVED.  THE USDEL SHOULD EXPRESS INTEREST IN 
PRESENTATIONS FROM MEMBER STATES AND REGIONAL 
INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS THAT SHARE EXPERIENCES 
RELATED TO DEVELOPING/CONDUCTING SPACE NPS APPLICATIONS 
CONSISTENT WITH ELEMENTS OF THE FRAMEWORK.  THE USDEL 
COULD SUGGEST AN INTERSESSIONAL MEETING IN JUNE 2009 TO 
DEVELOP A PLAN FOR HOLDING THE WORKSHOP IN 2010. 
 
13.  IF THE FRAMEWORK IS APPROVED BY THE STSC, THE 
POSSIBILITY EXISTS THAT ONE OR MORE WORKING GROUP MEMBERS 
COULD PROPOSE THAT THE TIME IS NOW APPROPRIATE FOR 
RE-EVALUATING AND/OR MODIFYING THE 1992 PRINCIPLES.  USDEL 
SHALL NOT AGREE TO ANY DISCUSSION OF THE STATUS OF THE 
PRINCIPLES BUT SHOULD DEFER THE DISCUSSION OF THIS TOPIC 
UNTIL A POSSIBLE INTERSESSIONAL MEETING IN JUNE TO PLAN A 
WORKSHOP IN 2010 (SEE PREVIOUS PARAGRAPH 12).  IF OTHER 
DELEGATIONS COMMENT ON OR SEEK TO INTRODUCE PROPOSALS FOR 
REVISION OF THE UN PRINCIPLES, THE USDEL SHALL DRAW ON THE 
FOLLOWING POINTS: 
 
A.    THE STSC HAS AGREED THAT, AT THE PRESENT TIME, 
REVISION OF THE PRINCIPLES IS NOT WARRANTED. IT HAS ALSO 
AGREED THAT A FIRM SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL FOUNDATION 
SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO POTENTIAL FUTURE 
DISCUSSIONS OF THE PRINCIPLES. FURTHER, IT HAS NOTED THAT 
IT WOULD BE INAPPROPRIATE TO REFER THE TOPIC TO THE LEGAL 
SUBCOMMITTEE BEFORE SUCH TECHNICAL FOUNDATION IS 
ESTABLISHED; AND 
 
B.    THE LEGAL SUBCOMMITTEE (LSC) HAS DECIDED TO SUSPEND 
CONSIDERATION IN ITS WORKING GROUP OF THE PRINCIPLES. 
 
14.  THE USDEL SHALL NOT ACTIVELY ENGAGE IN FORMAL DEBATE 
ON PROPOSALS OF OTHER DELEGATIONS FOR ADDITIONS TO, OR 
ELABORATION OF, THE PRINCIPLES AND SHOULD NOT JOIN 
CONSENSUS ON ANY SUCH PROPOSALS.  IN PARTICULAR, THE USDEL 
SHALL NOT AGREE TO A DISCUSSION OF THE CURRENT PRINCIPLES 
IN THE FRAMEWORK. IF ASKED, 
 
-- THE UNITED STATES HAS DETERMINED THAT WHILE THE 
PRINCIPLES HAVE NO BINDING EFFECT ON NATIONAL PROGRAMS, 
U.S. POLICY AND PRACTICE ARE FULLY CONSISTENT WITH THE 
INTENT OF THE PRINCIPLES. 
 
-- WE HAVE A RIGOROUS SAFETY REVIEW PROCESS IN PLACE PRIOR 
TO THE LAUNCH OF NPS AND WE CONTINUE TO APPLY THAT 
PROCESS. 
 
 
15. USDEL SHALL REPORT TO WASHINGTON ON THE VIEWS OF OTHER 
NATIONS RELATIVE TO THE USE OF NPS IN OUTER SPACE TO 
ASSIST IN PLANNING FOR FUTURE UN MEETINGS. 
 
16. NEAR-EARTH OBJECTS (NEO): THIS TOPIC IS BEING 
CONSIDERED UNDER A MULTI-YEAR WORK PLAN.  THIS YEAR, 
MEMBER STATES ARE INVITED TO REPORT ON NATIONAL, REGIONAL 
AND INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES FOR OBSERVATION 
AND ANALYSIS OF NEAR-EARTH OBJECTS.  THE U.S. WILL PROVIDE 
A STATEMENT AND SPECIAL PRESENTATION ON THIS TOPIC TO 
INCLUDE DETAILS ON RELATED U.S. RESEARCH EFFORTS, 
INCLUDING NASA SPACE AND GROUND RESEARCH.  AT THIS 
SESSION, THE NEO WORKING GROUP AND THE STSC WILL LIKELY 
HEAR A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE ASSOCIATION OF SPACE 
EXPLORERS (ASE) FOR THE UN TO ESTABLISH AN INTERNATIONAL 
DECISION-MAKING BODY TO ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL OR GLOBAL 
THREATS FROM NEOs THAT ARE EXPECTED TO IMPACT THE EARTH. 
THE USG DOES NOT SUPPORT THE CREATION OF NEW UN BODIES 
WITHOUT A COMPELLING JUSTIFICATION, NOR IS IT PRESENTLY IN 
A POSITION TO FINANCIALLY SUPPORT ANY NEW GROUPS. IN 
ADDITION, THE USG HAS NOT ESTABLISHED A POSITION ON AN 
INTERNATIONAL DECISION-MAKING BODY TO ADDRESS NEO IMPACT 
THREATS.  THE DELEGATION SHOULD FOCUS THE WORKING GROUP,S 
ATTENTION ON HOW MEMBER STATES CAN INCREASE CAPABILITIES 
TO DETECT AND TRACK POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS NEOS, EXCHANGE 
DATA ON THEIR ORBITS AND FUTURE POSITION, AND PREPARE 
MECHANISMS TO RAPIDLY PROVIDE INFORMATION TO GOVERNMENTS 
SHOULD A POTENTIAL EARTH IMPACTING OBJECT BE IDENTIFIED. 
THE DELEGATION MAY ENGAGE IN DISCUSSION ON THIS PARTICULAR 
ASPECT OF NEOS AND CONSULT WITH WASHINGTON BEFORE JOINING 
CONSENSUS ON ANY DECISIONS RELATED TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF 
SUCH A BODY. 
 
17. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE 
SYSTEMS: AT ITS 44TH SESSION, THE STSC AGREED TO ADD TO 
ITS AGENDA AN ITEM DEALING WITH RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN 
GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEMS AND THEIR 
APPLICATIONS.  THIS ITEM WILL PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR 
SYSTEM OPERATORS TO REPORT ON THE STATUS OF THEIR 
PROGRAMS.  IT WILL ALSO SERVE TO BRING MEMBER STATES UP TO 
DATE ON THE WORK OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON GNSS 
AND THE PROVIDERS FORUM. USDEL WILL DELIVER A STATEMENT ON 
THE STATUS OF GPS AND EFFORTS BEING UNDERTAKEN 
INTERNATIONALLY TO PROMOTE THE USE OF GPS. 
 
18. BEST PRACTICES FOR SAFE SPACE OPERATIONS:  AT THE 50TH 
SESSION OF THE FULL COPUOS, CHAIRMAN BRACHET PRESENTED A 
COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE FUTURE ACTIVITIES OF 
COPUOS ENTITLED, "FUTURE ROLES AND ACTIVITIES OF THE 
COMMITTEE ON THE PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE."  BRACHET 
BELIEVES THAT COPUOS NEEDS TO PLAY ITS ROLE IN SHAPING THE 
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR SPACE ACTIVITIES AND IN 
PROMOTING INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN AREAS SUCH AS 
RESEARCH, APPLICATIONS, OPERATIONS, AND EXPLORATION.  HE 
BELIEVES THAT COPUOS SHOULD ALSO LOOK AT THE LONGER TERM 
ISSUES FACING THE FUTURE PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE AND 
IDENTIFY WHERE THE COMMITTEE CAN BEST CONTRIBUTE TO THE 
SUSTAINABILITY OF SPACE ACTIVITIES AND TO THEIR FUTURE 
PROGRESS FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL. 
 
LONG-TERM SUSTAINABILITY OF SPACE ACTIVITIES: CHAIRMAN 
BRACHET,S ASSESSMENT OF THE SUSTAINABILITY OF SPACE 
ACTIVITIES SPECIFICALLY NOTED THE EXCELLENT WORK DONE BY 
THE STSC IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF VOLUNTARY DEBRIS MITIGATION 
GUIDELINES.  THE ASSESSMENT NOTED THE LARGER NUMBERS OF 
SPACE ACTORS AND SUGGESTED THAT IT IS IMPERATIVE TO AGREE 
ON "RULES OF THE ROAD" TO AVOID INTERFERENCE, COLLISIONS, 
AND OTHER MISHAPS, PARTICULARLY BY NEWCOMERS TO SPACE 
OPERATIONS.  BRACHET IS NOT SUGGESTING THAT THERE IS A 
NEED TO MODIFY THE PRESENT TREATY REGIME, BUT RATHER TO 
DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS TO DEAL WITH THE NEW REALITIES OF 
SPACE OPERATIONS.  TO FURTHER THIS CONCEPT, THE GOVERNMENT 
OF FRANCE HOSTED AN INFORMAL CONSULTATION GROUP THAT MET 
TWICE IN 2008 TO PRODUCE, IN COLLABORATION WITH RELEVANT 
INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE 
PRIVATE SECTOR, A TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION 
AND POTENTIAL FUTURE WORK IN THIS AREA FOR UNCOPUOS. 
 
THE U.S. PARTICIPATED IN BOTH MEETINGS OF THE INFORMAL 
CONSULTATIONS AND IS A MEMBER OF THE DRAFTING GROUP 
ESTABLISHED THROUGH THESE CONSULTATIONS TO DOCUMENT THE 
RESULTS. THE CONSULTATIONS INCLUDED A CROSS-SECTION OF 
COPUOS MEMBER STATES, INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, AND 
COMMERCIAL SPACE OPERATORS.  THOSE PARTICIPATING IN THE 
MEETINGS AGREED TO CONTINUE THE EXCHANGE OF RELEVANT VIEWS 
ON THIS SUBJECT WITH THE OBJECTIVE OF DRAFTING AN OUTLINE 
DOCUMENT THAT COULD GUIDE FURTHER WORK IN THIS AREA BY THE 
STSC, NO EARLIER THAN 2010.  BRACHET INTENDS TO HAVE A 
THIRD MEETING OF THE INFORMAL WORKING GROUP TO REVIEW THE 
DRAFT REPORT AND DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITY OF INTRODUCING A 
MULTI-YEAR WORK PLAN AT THE 2009 SESSION OF COPUOS FOR THE 
STSC TO BEGIN WORK IN 2010. THAT PLAN WOULD CULMINATE IN 
THE FINALIZATION OF A DOCUMENT ON "BEST PRACTICES FOR 
SPACE OPERATIONS." 
 
IN THE COURSE OF CONSIDERING THE FRENCH PROPOSAL, THE 
USDEL SHOULD MAKE THE FOLLOWING POINTS IN ORDER TO ENSURE 
THAT THE FUTURE WORK OF THE INFORMAL CONSULTATIONS AND ANY 
PROPOSAL TO THE STSC IS PROPERLY FRAMED: 
 
(1) FUTURE WORK WILL ADDRESS BEST PRACTICES ASSOCIATED 
WITH SPACE OPERATIONS, PROCEDURES, AND POLICIES FROM 
PRE-LAUNCH THROUGH END OF LIFE ACTIVITIES, (NOTE: THESE 
EFFORTS SHOULD BEAR IN MIND, BUT NOT DUPLICATE OR REOPEN, 
THE ACTIVITIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS BEING UNDERTAKEN IN THE 
STSC WORKING GROUP ON NUCLEAR POWER SOURCES IN SPACE AND 
THE WORK OF THE STSC AND IADC ON ORBITAL DEBRIS 
MITIGATION. END NOTE); 
 
(2) THE FUTURE WORK SHOULD INVOLVE INPUT FROM  STATE 
MEMBERS, SPACE-FARING NATION REPRESENTATIVES, COMMERCIAL 
SPACE OPERATORS AND PROVIDERS ON THEIR  BEST PRACTICES 
ASSOCIATED WITH SAFE SPACE OPERATIONS, PROCEDURES, AND 
POLICIES; 
 
(3) FUTURE WORK COULD INCLUDE THE PREPARATION OF A 
CONSOLIDATED LIST OF BEST PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH SAFE 
SPACE OPERATIONS; 
 
(4) FOR FUTURE REFERENCE: IN THE EVENT THAT IT IS AGREED 
AT A FUTURE COPUOS THAT THE STSC WOULD DEVELOP VOLUNTARY 
SAFE SPACE OPERATION GUIDELINES, THOSE GUIDELINES WOULD: 
(a) BE NO MORE STRINGENT THAN THE ASSOCIATED EXISTING USG 
POLICIES, PRINCIPLES, PROCEDURES, REGULATIONS, STANDARD 
PRACTICES, AND GUIDELINES; 
(b) REMAIN VOLUNTARY FOR EVERY STATE RESPONSIBLE FOR 
SPACE ACTIVITIES AND NOT BE LEGALLY BINDING UNDER 
INTERNATIONAL LAW; 
(c) NOT PROVIDE SPECIFIC OR ADDITIONAL PENALTIES FOR 
FAILING TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES, BEYOND THOSE ALREADY 
PROVIDED UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW; 
(d) ENSURE THAT EACH PROPOSED GUIDELINE MAINTAINS OR 
IMPROVES THE SAFETY OF SPACEFLIGHT OPERATIONS AND PROTECTS 
THE SPACE ENVIRONMENT WITHOUT IMPOSING UNACCEPTABLE OR 
UNREASONABLE COSTS; AND 
(e) BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ACTIVITIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 
OF THE STSC WORKING GROUP ON NUCLEAR POWER SOURCES IN 
SPACE, THE WORK AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE IADC AND THE 
STSC CONCERNING ORBITAL DEBRIS MITIGATION AND THE UNCOPUOS 
GUIDELINES ON ORBITAL DEBRIS MITIGATION. 
 
(5) ANY WORK OF THE STSC WOULD NOT ADDRESS THE CURRENT 
OUTER SPACE LEGAL REGIME OR ANY LEGAL QUESTIONS/ISSUES. 
THE USG POSITION REMAINS THAT: 
(a) THE 1967 OUTER SPACE TREATY, 1968 RESCUE AND RETURN 
AGREEMENT, THE 1972 LIABILITY CONVENTION, AND THE 1975 
REGISTRATION CONVENTION SHOULD BE ADOPTED AND FULLY 
ADHERED TO BY ALL NATIONS; 
(b) THE PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED IN THESE AGREEMENTS HAVE 
STOOD THE TEST OF TIME BECAUSE THEY CREATED THE 
FUNDAMENTAL GUIDELINES REQUIRED FOR THE FREE ACCESS TO, 
AND USE OF, OUTER SPACE FOR PEACEFUL PURPOSES; AND, 
(c) THESE AGREEMENTS FORM THE LEGAL BASIS FOR ALL OUTER 
SPACE OPERATIONS. 
 
(6).FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION: THE INTERNATIONAL CIVIL 
AVIATION ORGANIZATION (ICAO), INTERNATIONAL 
TELECOMMUNICATIONS UNION (ITU), EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY 
(ESA), AND EUMETSAT SHOULD BE INVITED TO SEND EXPERTS WITH 
RELEVANT EXPERTISE IN SPACE OPERATIONS TO PARTICIPATE AS 
OBSERVERS IN THE INFORMAL CONSULTATIONS AND FUTURE WORK OF 
THE STSC. 
(a) AN INVITATION TO THE ITU SHOULD EMPHASIZE THEIR 
POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTIONS IN PROVIDING INFORMATION CONCERNING 
THE ITU,S PROCESSES FOR COORDINATING USE BY GEOSTATIONARY 
SATELLITES OF RADIO FREQUENCIES AND ASSOCIATED ORBITAL 
LOCATIONS. 
(b)INVITATIONS TO ESA AND EUMETSAT SHOULD NOTE THEIR 
ROLE AS A LEADING INTERNATIONAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 
ORGANIZATION THAT HAVE DECLARED ACCEPTANCE OF RIGHTS AND 
OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE LIABILITY AGREEMENT AND THE 
REGISTRATION CONVENTION. THEY ARE BOTH PERMANENT OBSERVERS 
IN COPUOS. 
 
THE USG WILL OPPOSE ATTEMPTS AT COPUOS TO LIMIT USG 
FREEDOM OF ACTION IN OUTER SPACE AND OR TO ESTABLISH 
GENERAL PROHIBITIONS ON LEGTIMATE U.S. PEACEFUL SPACE 
ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED IN PURSUIT OF NATIONAL INTERESTS. 
 
THE USG WILL: 
 
(11) CONTINUE TO VOLUNTARILY OFFER ITS UNCLASSIFIED SPACE 
OBJECT TRACKING DATA, FREE OF CHARGE, TO NATIONS AS WELL 
AS COMMERCIAL OPERATORS AND CIVIL SOCIETY; 
 
(12) REMAIN OPEN ABOUT THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF ITS 
NATIONAL SPACE POLICIES: 
(a) REAFFIRM ITS COMMITMENT TO THE PRINCIPLE OF FREE 
ACCESS TO AND USE OF SPACE BY ALL/ALL NATIONS FOR PEACEFUL 
PURPOSES; 
(b)CONTINUE TO SEEK INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION WITH OTHER 
NATIONS IN THE PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE; 
(c). REMAIN READY TO WORK WITH OTHER NATIONS TO EXTEND THE 
BENEFITS OF SPACE, TO ENHANCE SPACE EXPLORATION, AND TO 
USE SPACE TO PROTECT AND PROMOTE FREEDOM AROUND THE WORLD; 
AND 
(d)REQUEST THAT OTHER NATIONS DEMONSTRATE SIMILAR 
TRANSPARENCY REGARDING THEIR OWN SPACE POLICIES, 
PROCEDURES, ACTIVITIES AND INTENTIONS IN OUTER SPACE. 
 
 
19. ARMS CONTROL: THE ISSUE OF SPACE ARMS CONTROL MAY BE A 
MAJOR ISSUE GIVEN THE NEW U.S. ADMINISTRATION.  IF THIS 
OCCURS, USDEL SHOULD STRESS THAT COPUOS IS CONCERNED 
EXCLUSIVELY WITH INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE PEACEFUL 
USES OF OUTER SPACE, AS INDICATED BY ITS TITLE.  THE FIRST 
COMMITTEE OF THE UNGA (DISARMAMENT AND INTERNATIONAL 
SECURITY) AND THE CD WOULD BE THE MORE APPROPRIATE 
MULTILATERAL FORA TO DISCUSS ARMS CONTROL MATTERS RELATED TO 
OUTER SPACE.  OUR OBJECTIVE IN COPUOS AND ITS SUBCOMMITTEES 
IS TO UNDERSCORE THE UNPRECEDENTED INTERNATIONAL SPACE 
COOPERATION NOW UNDERWAY AND REINFORCE RESISTANCE TO 
INCREASING CALLS IN THE CD FOR NEGOTIATIONS ON OUTER SPACE. 
USDEL MAY DRAW ON THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL POINTS AS 
NECESSARY: 
 
-- THERE IS UNPRECEDENTED INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN SPACE. 
 
-- PROVISIONS OF THE OUTER SPACE TREATY SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESS 
CONCERNS ABOUT SPACE-BASED WEAPONS. 
 
-- LAWFUL MILITARY USES OF SPACE HAVE BROAD BENEFITS FOR THE 
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY AND ENHANCE INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND 
SECURITY.  EXAMPLES INCLUDE TREATY COMPLIANCE/ MONITORING, 
COMMUNICATIONS, ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, GPS, REFUGEE 
TRACKING, COUNTERTERRORISM, AND SANCTIONS ENFORCEMENT. 
 
--(IF ASKED) IF THE USDEL IS PRESSED ABOUT THE 
ADMINISTRATION,S STATEMENT ON THE WHITEHOUSE DEFENSE WEB 
SITE FOR A WORLDWIDE BAN ON WEAPONS THAT INTERFERE WITH 
MILITARY AND COMMERCIAL SATELLITES (SEE NOTE BELOW FOR EXACT 
STATEMENT), THE USDEL WILL STATE THAT THE NEW ADMINISTRATION 
IS IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING ALL POLICIES AS A NATURAL PART 
OF THE GOVERNMENT TRANSITION PROCESS. 
 
-- IF FURTHER PRESSED REGARDING LIKELY CONTINUITIES IN U.S. 
SPACE POLICY, USDEL MAY ALSO NOTE THAT: 
 
--- IT IS A PART OF LONGSTANDING U.S. SPACE POLICY THAT THE 
UNITED STATES WILL MAINTAIN AND STRENGTHEN THE ESTABLISHED 
PRINCIPLE OF FREE ACCESS TO, AND USE OF, OUTER SPACE BY ALL 
NATIONS IN SUPPORT OF LEGITIMATE ECONOMIC AND SECURITY 
INTERESTS. 
 
--- AS SPACE BECOMES AN INCREASINGLY CONGESTED AND COMPLEX 
DOMAIN, THE UNITED STATES WILL TAKE AN ACTIVE LEADERSHIP ROLE 
IN IDENTIFYING AND IMPLEMENTING COOPERATIVE EFFORTS WITH 
ESTABLISHED AND EMERGING MEMBERS OF THE INTERNATIONAL 
SPACEFARING COMMUNITY TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THE SPACE 
ASSETS OF ALL NATIONS. 
 
--- BUILDING UPON RECENT PROGRESS AT THE UNITED NATIONS ON 
INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ORBITAL DEBRIS MITIGATION, THE 
UNITED STATES WILL SUSTAIN ITS GLOBAL LEADERSHIP IN 
SPACEFLIGHT SAFETY AND IN THE FORMULATION OF PRACTICAL 
GUIDELINES TO PRESERVE THE SPACE ENVIRONMENT FOR FUTURE 
GENERATIONS. 
ENFORCEMENT. 
 
NOTE: STATEMENT ON WWW.WHITEHOUSE.GOV/AGENDA/DEFENSE READS: 
&BUILD DEFENSE CAPABILITIES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY; ENSURE 
FREEDOM OF SPACE: THE OBAMA-BIDEN ADMINISTRATION WILL RESTORE 
AMERICAN LEADERSHIP ON SPACE ISSUES, SEEKING A WORLDWIDE BAN 
ON WEAPONS THAT INTERFERE WITH MILITARY AND COMMERCIAL 
SATELLITES.  THEY WILL THOROUGHLY ASSESS POSSIBLE THREATS TO 
U.S. SPACE ASSETS AND THE BEST OPTIONS, MILITARY AND 
DIPLOMATIC, FOR COUNTERING THEM, ESTABLISHING CONTINGENCY 
PLANS TO ENSURE THAT U.S. FORCES CAN MAINTAIN OR DUPLICATE 
ACCESS TO INFORMATION FROM SPACE ASSETS AND ACCELERATING 
PROGRAMS TO HARDEN U.S. SATELLITES AGAINST ATTACK.8 
 
20. OUTER SPACE "CODE OF CONDUCT:" THE ISSUE OF PROPOSALS FOR 
AN OUTER SPACE "CODE OF CONDUCT" WILL PROBABLY NOT BE A MAJOR 
ISSUE, BUT SOME DELEGATIONS MAY SEEK CLARIFICATION OF THE NEW 
ADMINISTRATION'S POSITION. THESE REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION 
MAY NOTE A DRAFTING PROJECT FOR A "CODE OF CONDUCT FOR OUTER 
SPACE ACTIVITIES" THAT WAS ENDORSED IN DECEMBER 2008 BY THE 
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (REFTEL C). IF RAISED, USDEL 
MAY DRAW UPON THE FOLLOWING POINTS AS NECESSARY: 
 
-- THE UNITED STATES WILL PLAY A LEADING ROLE IN ADVANCING 
TRANSPARENCY AND CONFIDENCE BUILDING MEASURES (TCBMS) 
RELATING TO SPACE ACTIVITIES.  SUCH TCBMS CAN HELP INCREASE 
TRANSPARENCY REGARDING GOVERNMENTAL SPACE POLICIES, 
STRATEGIES AND POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS ACTIVITIES -- THUS 
REDUCING UNCERTAINTY OVER INTENTIONS AND DECREASING THE RISK 
OF MISINTERPRETATION OR MISCALCULATION. 
 
-- IN THIS REGARD, THE ADMINISTRATION WILL CONTINUE TO WORK 
CLOSELY WITH OUR FRIENDS AND ALLIES IN EUROPE AND ELSEWHERE 
TO DEVELOP VOLUNTARY TCBMS THAT ALL SPACEFARING NATIONS CAN 
SUPPORT AND ACTIVELY PARTICIPATE IN FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL 
NATIONS. 
 
-- ANY INTERNATIONAL EFFORT TO DEVELOP TCBMS SHOULD 
COMPLEMENT, AND NOT UNNECESSARILY DUPLICATE, THE WORK OF THE 
COPUOS. 
 
-- IN SUPPORT OF THIS PRINCIPLE IN TODAY,S ENVIRONMENT, IT 
IS IMPORTANT THAT THE UNITED STATES WORK CLOSELY WITH ITS 
ALLIES TO IMPLEMENT THE DIPLOMATIC OR MILITARY MEASURES THAT 
MAY BE NECESSARY BOTH TO ENSURE THE CONTINUED OPERATION (AND 
RESPONSIBLE USE) OF MILITARY, INTELLIGENCE, CIVIL, AND 
COMMERCIAL SATELLITES AND TO RESPOND APPROPRIATELY IF THESE 
SATELLITES ARE TARGETED IN A HOSTILE MANNER. 
 
21. MILITARY SPACE ACTIVITIES: THE NATURE AND CONDUCT OF U.S. 
MILITARY SPACE ACTIVITIES WILL PROBABLY NOT BE A MAJOR ISSUE. 
HOWEVER, SOME DELEGATIONS MAY RAISE VARIOUS U.S. MILITARY 
ACTIVITIES AS A TACTICAL DEVICE TO UNDERCUT U.S. EFFORTS TO 
PROMOTE GENERAL AND UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES FOR SPACEFLIGHT 
SAFETY. IF RAISED, USDEL MAY DRAW ON FOLLOWING POINTS, AS 
NECESSARY: 
 
-- LAWFUL MILITARY USES OF SPACE HAVE BROAD BENEFITS FOR THE 
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY AND ENHANCE INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND 
SECURITY.  EXAMPLES INCLUDE TREATY COMPLIANCE/MONITORING, 
COMMUNICATIONS, ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, GPS, REFUGEE 
TRACKING, COUNTERTERRORISM, AND SANCTIONS ENFORCEMENT. 
 
-- THE U.S. IS COMMITTED TO THE PRINCIPLE THAT ALL 
SPACEFLIGHT OPERATIONS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED IN A SAFE AND 
RESPONSIBLE MANNER THAT PROTECTS HUMANS IN SPACE AS WELL AS 
ROBOTIC SPACE SYSTEMS AND THEIR MISSION EFFECTIVENESS. 
 
--- (IF ASKED) THE U.S. COMMITMENT TO SAFETY AND TRANSPARENCY 
ALSO WAS EXHIBITED IN LAST YEAR'S ENGAGEMENT OF THE DISABLED 
USA-193 SATELLITE (REFTELS B AND C). 
 
--- (IF ASKED) AS A U.S. EXPERT FORECAST IN A SPECIAL 
TECHNICAL PRESENTATION MADE AT LAST YEAR'S STSC, DEBRIS 
RESULTING THE SUCCESSFUL ENGAGEMENT OF USA-193 QUICKLY 
RE-ENTERED THE EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE. THE LAST PIECE OF 
TRACKABLE DEBRIS WAS ESTIMATED TO HAVE RE-ENTERED ON OR ABOUT 
NOVEMER 16, 2008. 
CLINTON