Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08WELLINGTON370, NZ'S ELECTION UNDER THE CONTROVERSIAL MMP

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08WELLINGTON370.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08WELLINGTON370 2008-11-03 06:13 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Wellington
VZCZCXRO1303
RR RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0370/01 3080613
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 030613Z NOV 08
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5509
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1774
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5302
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0741
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 WELLINGTON 000370 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP 
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM NZ
SUBJECT: NZ'S ELECTION UNDER THE CONTROVERSIAL MMP 
SYSTEM 
 
WELLINGTON 00000370  001.2 OF 004 
 
 
1. (SBU) Summary.  On November 8, New Zealand goes to 
the polls under the Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) 
parliamentary system.  Though initially popular when 
introduced in 1996, the country is now divided over 
MMP's merits.  If National forms the next government, 
it has promised to review MMP.  Labour and the smaller 
parties, all of which have benefited from MMP, have 
expressed little desire to review the system.  In order 
to form a government, both Labour and National are 
unlikely to get a popular majority of Parliamentary 
seats and therefore will need the support of one or 
more smaller parties, a situation which can give a 
minor party a disproportionate voice in government 
policy.  As with past MMP elections, the minor party 
that holds the balance of power will be able to 
influence the policy agenda of the next government.  We 
summarize here the sometimes perplexing MMP system, the 
controversy it has generated, and how it may determine 
New Zealand's next government.  End Summary. 
 
NZ's Proportional Representation System 
--------------------------------------- 
 
2. (U)  Since 1996, New Zealand has operated under the 
"Mixed Member Proportional" (MMP) system.  Prior to 
1996, New Zealand's voting system was the simple 
plurality, winner-takes-all voting system.  In 1993, 
the then-National Government, bending to a growing 
public desire to move away from the plurality voting 
system, held a binding referendum in conjunction with 
the general election that year on whether to change the 
1993 Electoral Act in order to establish a MMP system. 
The pro-MMP vote won by a comfortable margin, 54 
percent to 46 percent. 
 
3. (U)  Under MMP, each voter casts two votes, one for 
a local electorate MP (a constituency seat), and one 
for a political party.  Prior to the election, each 
party submits a rank-order listing of its proportional 
candidates.  Each registered party's total number of 
party votes decides its share of seats in Parliament. 
A person can be a "dual candidate" by standing for an 
electorate seat as well as being on the party list.  A 
dual candidate who wins an electorate seat has his or 
her name deleted from the party list, and replaced by a 
lower ranked name. 
 
4. (U)  In order to gain a share of Parliament seats, a 
party must first qualify either by winning at least 
five percent of all the party votes cast, or by winning 
at least one electorate (constituency) seat.  Each 
qualified party is allocated enough party vote (list) 
seats to add to any electorate seats it has won so that 
its total number of seats is close to its share of all 
the eligible party votes cast.  Parties fill their list 
seats by drawing off the allocated number of candidates 
in the order in which they appear on the party's list, 
and voters cannot change that order.  The MPs chosen in 
this way are called list MPs. 
 
Overhang:  Parliament Size Can Vary Under MMP 
--------------------------------------------- 
 
5. (SBU)  Fundamentally, each party holds seats in the 
new Parliament in proportion to its party vote, not the 
number of electorates it wins.  If a party, usually a 
minor party, wins more local electoral seats than its 
percentage of the proportional vote, this makes it 
impossible for another party, usually a large party 
such a Labour or National, to hold the number of seats 
it should according to proportional principles within 
the original 120-seat Parliament.  The solution is 
overhang.  The Electoral Commission determines how many 
seats need to be added to 120 so that each party has no 
fewer seats than its proportional vote.  These extra 
seats are the overhang. 
 
6.  (SBU)  The overhang is a contentious issue because 
the greater the overhang, the higher the majority 
needed for a party to form a Government.  Under the MMP 
system, the New Zealand Parliament conventionally has 
120 seats.  The current Parliament has 121 MPs - the 
one extra MP being earned by the Maori Party 2005 
election when it won more electorate seats than the 
party vote gave them, i.e., its party vote gave it 
 
WELLINGTON 00000370  002.2 OF 004 
 
 
three seats but the party actually won four electorate 
(constituency) seats. 
 
Coalition and Minority Governments the Norm 
------------------------------------------- 
 
7. (U)  Since the MMP system was introduced in 1996, 
there has never been a majority government (where one 
party holds the majority of seats in Parliament thereby 
allowing it to govern alone without a coalition with 
other parties).  Since 1996, New Zealand has only ever 
had coalition governments (where one of the two major 
parties makes an informal agreement with one or more 
parties).  The current Labour-led governing arrangement 
is a coalition government formed with New Zealand 
First, United Future and the Progressive Party. 
 
Governments Formed in Post-Election Period 
------------------------------------------ 
 
8. (U)  In order to form a Government under MMP, one 
party or bloc of parties must command a majority of the 
votes in the House of Representatives.  When a majority 
is secured, a government is formed and the leader of 
the biggest party becomes Prime Minister (although 
formally the Prime Minister is selected by the Governor 
General).  In past MMP elections, the post-election 
periods have been a contest between the two major 
parties, Labour and National, to be the first to secure 
enough minor party support to form a governing 
majority. 
 
9. (SBU)  The post-election negotiating period does not 
normally last more than couple of weeks.  This period 
can, however, take longer as it did in 1996 when 
Winston Peters' New Zealand First Party took eight 
weeks to decide whether to support National or Labour 
(Peters eventually chose National after it promised to 
make him Treasurer.  Labour refused to promise him this 
position). 
 
Caretaker Government Until New One Formed 
----------------------------------------- 
 
10. (SBU)  During the negotiations to form a 
government, the current government remains in office, 
but limits its actions pursuant to the common 
convention of a caretaker government.  It is expected 
that the new government should be formed before January 
8, 2009, the last possible date for Parliament to sit 
following the 2008 election.  Though unlikely, it is 
possible that a caretaker government could continue 
beyond this point until new government is formed.  More 
informally, there is strong pressure for parties to 
complete formation of a government before summer 
vacation begins in mid-December. 
 
Referendum on MMP Overdue 
------------------------- 
 
11. (SBU)  When the 1993 Electoral Act to introduce MMP 
was drafted, a clause was inserted to allow for a 
review of the system after two MMP elections and to 
determine whether there should be a another referendum 
on electoral reform.  However, the country still awaits 
a review as the parliamentary committee established in 
2000 to examine MMP could not reach a decision on 
whether another referendum was needed. 
 
Country Divided Over MMP 
------------------------ 
 
12. (SBU)  On August 3, National Party leader John Key 
promised that a government led by his party would hold 
a binding referendum on MMP no later than 2011 
followed, if necessary, by a second referendum to 
establish what system should replace it.  However, many 
minor parties rely on MMP for their place in Parliament 
and a future National government could struggle to win 
sufficient support for a referendum.  Prime Minister 
Clark has been unenthusiastic about any change in the 
current MMP system, as it favors the Labour Party, 
which is the natural ally of the largest minor party, 
the Greens.  In a recent newspaper opinion piece, 
former New Zealand Prime Minister Mike Moore (Labour) 
 
WELLINGTON 00000370  003.2 OF 004 
 
 
criticized MMP as an "inherently unstable" electoral 
system which produces "squalid and sordid" post- 
election deals. 
 
13. (SBU)  The New Zealand public is divided over the 
merits of MMP.  A Research New Zealand poll of August 
2008 found forty-six percent favor a return to the old 
plurality voting system with forty-one percent in 
support of MMP.  Many New Zealanders are not 
comfortable with the hidden deals with minor parties 
that characterize MMP governments.  There is some 
public anxiety that small parties are able to wield a 
disproportionate amount of, sometimes radical, 
influence on policy agendas. 
 
Post-Election MMP Opposition Could Surge 
---------------------------------------- 
 
14. (SBU)  Since 1996, the party with the most party 
votes has led the government and there is public 
consensus (and tacit understanding among the political 
parties) that this is a fair reflection of the will of 
the people.  However, if Labour in 2008 is able to form 
a government despite losing to National on the party 
vote, then many New Zealanders may see this as contrary 
to the will of the country, and resentment towards MMP 
could rise.  Key has asserted that the biggest party has 
the right to form the government but Labour has 
disagreed, noting that governments should be formed by 
the community of interest within parliament.  Minor 
parties have been coy on the issue, paying lip service 
to due regard to the party that leads in party votes. 
 
How Labour Forms an MMP Coalition 
--------------------------------- 
 
15. (SBU)  Helen Clark is an astute and successful 
exponent of MPP.  She has built and maintained durable 
coalition and minority governments with a range of 
smaller parties, some with vastly different political 
philosophies.  Going into the 2008 election, Clark can 
rely on three parties - The Greens, NZ First and the 
Progressives - to offer support for a Labour-led 
government.  Despite this ready-made coalition of 
support, Labour faces three challenges in forming the 
next government.  Despite a narrowing gap, Labour is 
still polling significantly behind National.  Labour's 
final party vote must exceed thirty-five percent to 
give them any hope of forming a viable coalition.  In 
addition, the Greens vote must be close to ten percent. 
Finally, Winston Peters' NZ First must win an 
electorate seat or meet the five percent party vote 
threshold to return to parliament.  However, recent 
polling suggests that it will be difficult for Labour 
or the Greens to reach their watershed 35 and 10 
percent, respectively.  It will be almost impossible 
for NZ First to secure the five percent needed to 
return to parliament. 
 
How National Forms and MMP Coalition 
------------------------------------ 
 
16. (SBU)  Going into the 2008 election, National is 
ahead of Labour in the polls and is well positioned to 
secure the most party votes.  Nonetheless, National is 
unlikely to reach fifty percent and will therefore have 
to rely on support from the smaller parties.  Thus far, 
only two minor parties - the centrist United Future and 
the right-wing ACT Party - have signaled their intent 
to support a National-led Government.  If National 
polls in the high forties, then the support of United 
Future and ACT, likely to get a maximum four sets 
between them, may be enough for National to form the 
next government.  If National gets less than 47 
percent, as some analysts predict, then the only other 
real option open to National to form the next 
government is to persuade the Maori Party to support 
it.  (Note:  The Greens and Progressives have already 
signaled that they will not support a National-led 
Government, and Key has ruled out working with Winston 
Peters' NZ First Party, even if it does return to 
Parliament). 
 
Maori Party Likely Kingmaker 
---------------------------- 
 
WELLINGTON 00000370  004.2 OF 004 
 
 
 
17. (SBU)  In most MMP elections, there is usually a 
smaller party playing the role as kingmaker.  Its 
decision to support one of the two main parties will 
essentially decide the next government.  In 2008, the 
kingmaker role is very likely to be filled by the Maori 
Party, which is expected to return to parliament with 
five, possibly seven seats.  The Maori Party has been 
careful not to signal which party it will support, and 
both Labour and National have courted it ahead of 
November 8. 
 
The Second Campaign 
------------------- 
 
18. (SBU)  Unless one party gets fifty percent of the 
votes, which is unlikely at the 2008 election, the next 
government may not known until well after November 8 as 
Labour and National engage in a second campaign:  a 
post-election negotiation period with the smaller 
parties.  The Maori Party has stated that it will 
conduct a week-long series of consultation with its 
supporters around the country to seek guidance as to 
whom to support.  Recent Maori polling suggests that as 
much as 70 percent of Maori voters prefer Labour as a 
partner in government -- a significant challenge for 
National.  The Maori Party could extract significant 
concessions from the major parties in the post election 
period. 
 
Comment:  The Decisive Election for MMP 
--------------------------------------- 
 
19. (SBU)  the more critical the role of a coalition in 
forming New Zealand's next government, the more 
pressure will grow to reconsider MMP.  Two scenarios 
could prove particularly contentious:  first, if Labour 
wins fewer seats but forms the government by winning 
more minor party support; second, if Maori wins 
concessions from National seems contrary to National's 
platform.  Either scenario could increase calls for an 
MMP referendum as New Zealanders grow wary of the 
excessive influence minor parties have wielded over 
government policy under MMP.  End Comment. 
McCormick