Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08TOKYO271, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 02/01/08

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TOKYO271.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08TOKYO271 2008-02-01 07:48 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO6867
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #0271/01 0320748
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 010748Z FEB 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1444
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 8257
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 5861
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 9528
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 4491
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 6469
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 1457
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 7520
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 8154
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 TOKYO 000271 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 02/01/08 
 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) MOFA pressures Otaru for U.S. warship's port call? (Hokkaido 
Shimbun) 
 
(2) Stopgap bill battle ends in draw for ruling, opposition blocs 
due to good offices of Lower House speaker and Upper House president 
(Sankei) 
 
(3) Assessment of Fukuda administration on battle over 30-year-old 
provisional tax rate for gasoline: Revenue sources for road projects 
need to be reconsidered from a broad perspective (Yomiuri) 
 
(4) Impact of subprime loan fiasco growing, dealing serious blow to 
Japanese banks; Global stock plunges compounding situation 
(Yomiuri) 
 
(5) LDP, DPJ exploring ways for settlement on appointment of Muto as 
BOJ governor (Mainichi) 
 
(6) Exports of farm products up 16 PERCENT  last year, reflecting 
growing demand in Asia (Nikkei) 
 
(7) Editorial: Education Revitalization Council gone with Mr. Abe 
(Asahi) 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) MOFA pressures Otaru for U.S. warship's port call? 
 
HOKKAIDO SHIMBUN (Online) 
February 1, 2008 (07:12) 
 
OTARU-The USS Blue Ridge, a landing command ship of the U.S. Navy, 
plans to visit the port of Otaru (in Japan's northernmost main 
island of Hokkaido) on a Feb. 7-11 schedule, but the city of Otaru 
rejected the U.S. Navy's request for the planned port call because a 
commercial ship is also scheduled to be berthed there. Meanwhile, 
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has made a number of pressure-like 
inquiries to the municipal government of Otaru City about how the 
port's berth is being used. The city's senior officials are now 
being bewildered and repulsed. 
 
Otaru City, according to its municipal government officials, 
rejected the request (yousei wo kotowatta) on Jan. 28. After that, 
there were a total of nearly 10 telephone calls from MOFA up until 
Jan. 31. The phone calls were made by an assistant division director 
level official of MOFA's North American Affairs Bureau, the 
officials said. Moreover, the director of MOFA's Status of U.S. 
Forces Agreement Division directly called at the city's municipal 
government office. "We can't say anything about specific matters," 
an official of the MOFA division said. "But," this official added, 
"that was for the purpose of exchanging views in general." 
 
According to a senior official of the city, however, MOFA asserted: 
"The U.S. military informed the city of this port call on January 
16, so this matter should be prioritized over the decision that the 
city made on January 25 when you learned of the commercial ship's 
concurrent schedule." A MOFA official even said, "Your not 
coordinating (so that the Blue Ridge can enter port), shows you lack 
competence as a port administrator." Another senior official of the 
city said, "It's a kind of pressure." 
 
TOKYO 00000271  002 OF 010 
 
 
 
Until now, Otaru Mayor Katsumaro Yamada has accepted the visits of 
U.S. warships, even while maintaining the city's stance of giving 
priority to commercial ships. "They're even trying to chase away 
commercial ships in order to let military ships in," Yamada said. 
"If that is the case," the mayor added, "this is a military port." 
 
Port authority is a matter prescribed under the Port and Harbor Law, 
and local autonomy is another that falls under the jurisdiction of 
the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. The city's 
authorities therefore wonder why MOFA is meddling in matters that 
are outside its jurisdiction. 
 
MOFA, sheltering itself behind the Japan-U.S. Status of Forces 
Agreement, is acting if to say U.S. warships can enter whatever 
ports they like and whenever they like. The case of Otaru will 
likely become a touchstone for a tug of war between MOFA and local 
public entities. 
 
(2) Stopgap bill battle ends in draw for ruling, opposition blocs 
due to good offices of Lower House speaker and Upper House 
president 
 
SANKEI (Page 5) (Abridged slightly) 
February 1, 2008 
 
A head-on clash between the ruling and opposition blocs over a 
stopgap bill to maintain the provisional tax rates, including one on 
gasoline, was narrowly averted on Jan. 30 following an agreement 
between the secretaries general of the LDP and DPJ owning to the 
good offices of the chiefs of the two houses of the Diet. The Diet 
returned to normal yesterday. Although the two camps each declared 
"victory," their agreement can be interpreted in a variety of ways. 
There is no denying that they simply put off the highly 
controversial issue. Did anyone win in this agreement? 
 
Former LDP Secretary General Hidenao Nakagawa praised the agreement 
at a Machimura faction meeting on Jan. 30, saying: 
 
"Fears of a panic and Lower House dissolution in April have 
completely vanished. The stage has been set for talks between the 
ruling and opposition camps, so they can now freely discuss (the 
opposition camp's calls for) using road-related tax revenue for 
general purposes and introducing a green tax. " 
 
Had the ruling bloc rammed the stopgap bill through the Lower House, 
momentum would have built up for a Diet dissolution, with the 
opposition parties boycotting deliberations and possibly submitting 
a censure motion in the Upper House. Most faction leaders are now 
appreciative of the agreement, sharing a sense of relief. But the 
agreement includes ambiguous wording. "I wonder if that agreement is 
trustworthy," former Justice Minister Mayumi Moriyama said. Many LDP 
members share her view. 
 
First, clause 1 reads, "We shall reach a certain conclusion within 
the current fiscal year." Questions remain as to whether this means 
to aim at taking a vote in the Upper House. Upper House President 
Satsuki Eda categorically said that it meant bringing the matter to 
a vote. But DPJ Upper House Caucus Chairman Azuma Koshiishi denied 
Eda's interpretation, saying, "'A certain conclusion' does not 
equate to taking a vote." 
 
 
TOKYO 00000271  003 OF 010 
 
 
In the event the opposition camp protracts Lower House deliberations 
on the strength of "thorough deliberations," as is specified in the 
agreement, the gasoline battle might reignite in late February. 
 
Further, if the Diet becomes bogged down over other issues, such as 
pension-record mismanagement, the opposition bloc might throw the 
agreement into the wastebasket, saying the situation has changed. 
 
Revisions 
 
The biggest concern is to what extent the phrase "revisions by the 
legislative branch" applies to the matter. Given the specification 
of the "tax law," the matter would become out of control if the 
discussion expands to cover the overall tax system. 
 
The situation will become even more complicated if the DPJ seeks 
talks with the ruling bloc for the next year and beyond after giving 
a nod to extending the provisional gasoline tax rate by only one 
year instead of 10 years. 
 
Although such an option is utterly unacceptable for the LDP 
lawmakers with vested interests in roads, it might result in 
internal strife, with junior and mid-level members finding it 
agreeable. 
 
There is also a possibility that a grand coalition plan will 
reemerge as a result of talks between Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda 
and DPJ President Ichiro Ozawa, eventually escalating into political 
realignment. 
 
Declaration of victory 
 
DPJ Deputy President Naoto Kan held a press conference yesterday, in 
which he declared victory, saying: "We successfully persuaded (the 
ruling camp) to withdraw the bill that would have left a serious 
stain on the history of the Diet." 
 
But the DPJ's festive mood might be short-lived. The ruling bloc is 
playing up the aspect that an agreement was reached to bring the 
revenue-related bills to a vote in the Upper House by the end of 
March when the current tax rates expire. The DPJ's refusal to take a 
vote in the Upper House is certain to prompt the ruling bloc to 
launch a diatribe against the largest opposition party for breaking 
the promise and slighting the parliament. 
 
New Komeito Diet Affairs Committee Chairman Yoshio Urushibara at a 
Lower House members' meeting yesterday threatened the largest 
opposition party, saying: "If the DPJ whines at the end of this 
fiscal year, we will take the matter to the Lower House speaker and 
the Upper House president." The fact that Upper House President 
Satsuki Eda, who is from the DPJ, used his good offices weights 
heavy on the major opposition party. A DPJ failure to abide by the 
agreement would be certain to draw sharp public criticism. 
 
As such, the DPJ intends to win public support by calling not only 
for lowering gasoline prices but also criticizing the wasteful 
spending of road-related tax revenues. 
 
March showdown 
 
The DPJ has yet to come up with any clear alternate resources for 
the abolition of the provisional gasoline tax rate, which would cost 
 
TOKYO 00000271  004 OF 010 
 
 
1.7 trillion yen in revenues for the central government and 900 
billion yen for local governments. Local governments are deeply 
opposed to abolishing the provisional rate, which would force them 
to revise their budgets. Pressure from those regions might not only 
cause a schism in the DPJ but also result in a fissure in the 
coalition of opposition parties, including the People's New Party. 
 
Moreover, the DPJ, which has aimed at taking the reins of government 
through a "March showdown," would be forced to choose between losing 
public support as a result of breaking the agreement at the end of 
March and abandoning its "March showdown" slogan. 
 
(3) Assessment of Fukuda administration on battle over 30-year-old 
provisional tax rate for gasoline: Revenue sources for road projects 
need to be reconsidered from a broad perspective 
 
YOMIURI (Page 4) (Full) 
February 1, 2008 
 
"In terms of saving resources, curbing consumption, and improving 
financial resources for road construction, the government will raise 
the gasoline tax from the current 24,300 yen per kiloliter to 29,200 
yen as a provisional measure." During a Lower House Budget Committee 
session on Feb. 27, 1974, then Finance Minister Takeo Fukuda, father 
of Prime Minister Fukuda, made this explanation about why the 
government proposed revising the Special Taxation Measures Law, the 
revision including setting a provisional tax rate for gasoline. The 
person who sat in the chair's seat was Shintaro Abe, father of 
former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. 
 
At the time of the vote on the revision bill on March 22 (that 
year), then first-term lawmaker Junichiro Koizumi took the floor and 
expressed his support for revising that law this way: "Given the 
current oil situation, I think hiking the gasoline tax is an 
appropriate step." 
 
The revision bill was adopted in that Diet session. The provisional 
tax rate for gasoline, which began to be applied in 1974, has been 
raised three times now, and the deadline for that tax rate has been 
extended seven times to date. 
 
Debate in the current session of the Diet regarding revenue sources 
for road construction, as well as the provisional gasoline tax rate, 
involved a political struggle between the ruling and opposition 
parties over whether to lower the gasoline price. However, both 
sides later accepted mediation proposed by both the chiefs of the 
Diet chambers. A real debate will now start. 
 
Revenues for road construction date back to Japan's period of high 
economic growth. In 1954, when the first five-year road construction 
program was set in motion, a gasoline tax was established as a 
revenue source for the program. Other taxes were also established as 
funding sources for road projects one after the other until 1971. 
 
Furthermore, provisional tax rates since 1974 have been added to 
taxes that are set aside exclusively for road construction. Those 
additional provisional tax rates were applied because of financial 
difficulties that began in 1973 in order to cover the 7th road 
construction program. But the first oil shock that followed made it 
difficult for the government to hike taxes and instead moved it to 
establish provisional tax rates. The tax rates have remained the 
same over the past three decades. One government official noted: 
 
TOKYO 00000271  005 OF 010 
 
 
"Instead of modifying the law, using the term 'provisional' was easy 
for us to obtain the public's understanding." 
 
Revenues for road construction were regarded as a "sanctuary" for 
many years, but Prime Minister Koizumi initiated a review of them 
and drew the public's attention. In December 2005, the government 
and the ruling bloc announced a basic principle of formulating a 
specific plan on the condition that (revenues for road construction) 
be incorporated into general accounts. But meeting with fierce 
opposition from lawmakers of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party's 
(LDP) who support road construction, Koizumi was unable to come up 
with a concrete plan by the time he stepped down in September 2006. 
 
At the end of 2006, Prime Minister Abe adopted a package of specific 
measures at a cabinet meeting and incorporated in the package one 
item that an extra tax revenue portion exceeding the expenditures 
for road projects in every year's budget would be incorporated into 
the general account, but this idea was left half-finished. In fiscal 
2007, the combined amount of revenues for road projects for the 
central and local governments reached 5.6 trillion yen, but of that 
amount, only 18.06 billion yen was incorporated into the general 
account. 
 
What action will Prime Minister Fukuda take in this context? As far 
as his past remarks are concerned, he has shown no sign of attaching 
importance to reviewing revenues for road construction. An agreement 
reached between the government and the ruling parties at the end of 
December basically followed a set of specific measures announced by 
the Abe administration. 
 
A bill revising the Special Taxation Measures Law, which the 
government has introduced in the current session of the Diet, 
stipulates that the current provisional tax rate for gasoline of 
48.6 yen per liter (double the tax rate shown in the law) will 
remain the same over the next 10 years. The current tax rate for 
gasoline was determined in 1993, and the applicable term of that 
rate has been extended every five years in line with the five-year 
road construction program. The revision bill this time sets the 
length of an extension at 10 years, presumably envisioning the 
government's plan to work out a 10-year medium-term program for road 
construction in fiscal 2008. 
 
Heated discussions are likely between the government and the ruling 
and opposition parties in the weeks ahead as to whether to maintain 
the provisional tax rate, whether it is appropriate to extend the 
term for 10 years, whether to incorporate revenues for road 
construction into general accounts, and what will be road 
construction projects. 
 
At a meeting yesterday of the Upper House Budget Committee, Prime 
Minister Fukuda said: "If we fail to secure revenues for road 
construction to some extent, plans for road construction in local 
areas may be discarded. The central government needs to demonstrate 
its determination to construct roads, or (road construction) will 
dwindle away." The ruling and opposition blocs are both required to 
have thorough discussion of the system of revenue for road 
construction. 
 
(4) Impact of subprime loan fiasco growing, dealing serious blow to 
Japanese banks; Global stock plunges compounding situation 
 
YOMIURI (Page 11) (Almost full) 
 
TOKYO 00000271  006 OF 010 
 
 
February 1, 2008 
 
Six leading banks reported in their statements of accounts for the 
April-December period in 2007 subprime loan-related losses totaling 
530 billion yen. In particular, the Mizuho Financial Group reported 
approximately 345 billion yen in losses. The total amount will reach 
approximately 590 billion yen, if losses incurred by Shinsei Bank 
and Aozora Bank are included. Though it has been believed that 
Japanese banks have suffered relatively small losses compared with 
U.S. and European banks, the revelation indicates that the damage of 
the subprime loan crisis is larger than expected. 
 
Mizuho Financial Group sustains losses worth 345 billion yen 
 
Mizuho Financial Group Managing Director Satoru Nishihori during a 
briefing to investors held yesterday evening said, "The outcome is 
very regrettable. I want to complete the disposal of losses stemming 
from the subprime loan issue before the end of this fiscal year." 
The bank has made a major mistake in its calculation that instead of 
making a change for the better, as it projected, the stock market 
has lost ground since November last year, when it released an 
interim settlement of accounts through September. Its losses have 
snowballed while it has remained unable to sell shares. 
 
It is hardly possible to hope for a rise in the value of subprime 
loan-related financial products. Mizuho Securities has sustained 
especially large losses -- nearly 180 billion yen, as it holds a 
large amount of subprime loan-related securities. It will likely 
incur about 50 billion yen more losses in the January-March quarter 
in 2008. Accordingly, the Mizuho Financial Group now finds it 
imperative to revise down its projection for performance in the term 
ending in March 2008 (from April 2007 through March 2008). 
 
Aozora Bank revealed its plan to revise downward consolidated 
after-tax profits from the 62.6 billion yen as originally estimated 
to 26.5 billion yen. 
 
Monoline insurance companies 
 
U.S. banks held a great deal of subprime loan-related securitized 
products at structured investment vehicles (SIV), special asset 
management companies under their wing. Japanese companies sustained 
losses due to the worsened business conditions of SIV, in which they 
have invested. 
 
Mitsubishi-UFJ Financial Group reported about 55 billion yen in 
losses, of which 46 billion yen is related to SIV. Investment worth 
39 billion yen, which has not yet been reported as losses, could be 
completely lost. Furthermore, the increased bad subprime loans 
worsened the fiscal standing of monoline insurers. As a result, 
their credit ratings have been degraded. Mizuho Securities is 
suffering from manifold impacts of the loan fiasco, including 
loan-loss reserves worth approximately 49 billion yen in trading 
with monoline insurers. 
 
Subprime loan crisis also takes toll on investment trust funds 
 
That is not the only aftermath of the subprime loan calamity. Stock 
prices have declined further due to turmoil on the global financial 
market since August 2007. Approximately 1.3 trillion yen in latent 
profits on stocks held by the six financial groups disappeared only 
over three months from the end of September through the end of 
 
TOKYO 00000271  007 OF 010 
 
 
December 2007. 
 
Stock trading has been sluggish. Sales of investment trusts, a major 
pillar of commissions, have remained slow. Sales of investment 
trusts by the Mitsubishi-UFJ Financial Group in the October-December 
quarter dropped about 30 PERCENT . In the end, Mitsubishi-UFJ, 
Resona Holdings and Sumitomo Trust and Banking reported lower net 
operating profits, which show profits on the main line of business, 
than the preceding year. Speculative money has flown into the bond 
market, which is considered to be highly secure, giving rise to bond 
appreciation, though their interest rates have dropped. This is the 
only positive side of the loan fiasco. Sumitomo-Mitsui Financial 
Group racked up profits exceeding the same term the year before by 
110 billion yen in trading U.S. bonds. 
 
Leading banks have gained net operating profits four times larger 
than the losses they have incurred from the subprime loan fiasco. 
The amount of losses they have sustained are small in comparison 
with those incurred by European and U.S. banks, including Citigroup 
of the U.S., whose losses topped 2 trillion yen. Even so, concern 
about a possible expansion of losses is still simmering. The 
situation is steadily taking on a more serious aspect. 
 
(5) LDP, DPJ exploring ways for settlement on appointment of Muto as 
BOJ governor 
 
MAINICHI (Page 5) (Abridged) 
February 1, 2008 
 
Final coordination is now likely to be carried out to promote Bank 
of Japan (BOJ) Vice Governor Toshiro Muto to the BOJ governorship. 
This development reflects a desire by both the Liberal Democratic 
Party and the Democratic Party of Japan to avoid confusion in the 
Diet after they reached a compromise agreement on the stopgap bills 
to extend the provisional road-related tax rates. Some are exploring 
ways to bring about a settlement at party head talks. 
 
LDP Secretary General Bunmei Ibuki said in a general meeting of the 
Ibuki faction yesterday: "An end has been put (to the row over the 
stopgap legislation) very smoothly. Since Diet approval is needed 
for appointing a new BOJ governor, we decided on this direction, 
based on a comprehensive judgment." 
 
The incumbent BOJ governor's term of office expires on March 19. 
Chief Cabinet Secretary Nobutaka Machimura has indicated his 
willingness to present the name of a candidate to the Diet by 
mid-February. A senior DPJ member remarked: "If the stopgap bills 
had cleared the House of Representatives, our party might have 
rejected all proposals made by the LDP, including the appointment of 
a new BOJ governor." 
 
In an attempt to take advantage of the cooperative mood between the 
ruling and opposition parties, some LDP members have begun to 
suggest reflecting the DPJ's opinion in selecting a next vice 
governor in exchange for Muto's promotion. 
 
In a press conference yesterday, DPJ Deputy President Naoto Kan 
emphasized that his party will thoroughly discuss who should be 
picked as new BOJ governor, saying: "The role played by the BOJ is 
very heavy." 
 
Even so, the DPJ must avoid giving an impression that the party, 
 
TOKYO 00000271  008 OF 010 
 
 
abandoning its own judgment, agreed on the government's plan. 
Although it is necessary to take due procedures to reach an 
agreement with the government and the ruling parties, the main 
opposition party has yet to prepare any. 
 
DPJ Secretary General Yukio Hatoyama said: "It is desirable that the 
Prime Minister's Office's intention will be conveyed to President 
Ichiro Ozawa in some form, but I think it would be better not to 
hold party head talks, because that may lead some to speculate." 
 
(6) Exports of farm products up 16 PERCENT  last year, reflecting 
growing demand in Asia 
 
NIKKEI (Page 5) (Full) 
February 1 2008 
 
The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries announced 
yesterday that the value of Japan's exports of agricultural, 
forestry and fisheries products increased 16 PERCENT  to 433.8 
billion yen in 2007. The increase is attributed to expanding demand 
by wealthy persons in Asia, given remarkable economic growth in the 
region, as well as to the recent popularity of Japanese food. Japan 
saw exports of such products shoot up by double digits for the third 
consecutive year. Improvement in domestic agricultural productivity 
is the key to bolstering its price competitiveness in order to 
augment exports. 
 
By country, Hong Kong ranked first with an 18 PERCENT  share of the 
total, overtaking the U.S. In Hong Kong, Japanese food is becoming 
popular among the wealthy class, as seen from its resumption last 
April of Japanese beef imports, which had been banned following the 
discovery of BSE in Japan,. 
 
The total share of exports to Hong Kong, South Korea, China, Taiwan, 
Thailand, and Singapore topped 60 PERCENT . This figure shows that 
exports to Asia are becoming brisk, reflecting its sharp economic 
growth. 
 
Classified by product, fruits were in high demand, with export 
values of apples and pears rising 40.2 PERCENT  to 7.98 billion yen 
and 74.5 PERCENT  to 920 million yen, respectively. 
 
Rice exports surged 23.6 PERCENT  to 527 million yen. After a ban on 
rice exports to China was lifted for the first time in four years, 
Japan shipped 24 tons of rice to China on a trial basis. Its price 
was set about 20 times higher than that of domestic rice, but the 
Japanese rice was popular as a gift item and sold out only in one 
month or so, according to the National Federation of Agricultural 
Cooperative Associations. Beef exports to the U.S. and chicken 
exports to Vietnam tripled over the previous year. 
 
By sector, exports of farm products jumped 14.1 PERCENT  to 222.1 
billion yen, exports of marine products surged 18.2 PERCENT  to 
201.3 billion yen, and those of forestry products were up 15.6 
PERCENT  to 10.4 billion yen. 
 
The government aims to increase total exports to one trillion yen by 
ΒΆ2013. A MAFF official said: "Exports are steadily expanding." In 
great demand, however, are high-grade goods intended for rich 
consumers. Marubeni Economic Research Council Head Akio Shibata 
commented: "It is necessary for Japan to strengthen its price 
competitiveness in order to make Japanese agricultural products 
 
TOKYO 00000271  009 OF 010 
 
 
popular overseas." 
 
The total value of imported agriculture, forestry and fisheries 
products in 2006 was approximately 8 trillion yen, showing an excess 
of imports over exports. Now that domestic demand is shrinking as 
the nation ages and the population declines, it is necessary for 
Japan to enhance productivity by introducing a large-scale farming 
system and to promote agricultural management while focusing also on 
overseas markets. 
 
(7) Editorial: Education Revitalization Council gone with Mr. Abe 
 
ASAHI (Page 3) (Full) 
February 1, 2008 
 
The government's Education Revitalization Council yesterday 
submitted its final report to Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda. The final 
report calls for swift implementation of the proposals the council 
presented three times in the past. 
 
However since Shinzo Abe, who created the panel, has left the prime 
minister's post, it is uncertain how many proposals will be come to 
fruition. 
 
The government's panel was established in the fall of 2006 under the 
prodding of Abe, who placed top priority on educational reform at 
the time. The panel is headed by Nobel Prize winner Ryoji Noyori. 
Its members are experts from various circles. 
 
The purpose of the council was to reform the basics of education in 
order to build an education system suitable for Japan in the 21st 
century. Seeing the lineup of panel members, people might have 
expected them to hold active discussions and to present robust 
proposals. 
 
But there was a sense that the council was too close to the Abe 
government. It was symbolic that the panel quoted Abe's catchphrase 
"A Beautiful Country, Japan" in its first report. 
 
At the strong request of the Prime Minister's Official Residence, 
the first report incorporated such proposals as creating a system of 
renewing teaching licenses and allowing the Education Ministry to 
give directions to boards of education. These proposals led to 
reform of three education-related laws. 
 
We repeatedly pointed out in our editorials problematic points in 
the reform of the three laws, notably whether the reform would be 
able to resolve such issues as deteriorating academic ability and 
bullying in school and whether teachers would be daunted by strong 
control by the Education Ministry and would dampen their efforts. 
There is no evidence that the panel discussed these points. 
 
The idea of including moral education in the school curriculum, 
about which Abe was enthusiastic, was included in the final report. 
However, the idea will likely go nowhere, because both the Education 
Ministry and the Central Education Council are reluctant. 
 
If a panel comes under the strong influence of a government, the 
panel's fate will probably follow that of the government. Soon after 
the inauguration of the Fukuda government, the Education Ministry 
and the Prime Minister's Official Residence began distancing 
themselves from the council. Panel members expressed unhappiness 
 
TOKYO 00000271  010 OF 010 
 
 
with the move. 
 
If proposals were appropriate, they would have gotten public support 
without Abe's backup. It probably means that the proposals were not 
attractive. 
 
However, it goes without saying that the current education system 
needs reform. It is also necessary for various circles to come up 
with new ideas. 
 
In that case, it is important for them to build up arguments, 
ignoring political and administrative intentions. It is meaningless 
to support what a government wants to do. 
 
The panel should not conduct argument based on feelings and 
guesswork. It is vital for it to verify past reforms and listen to 
opinions of experts. 
 
There are many things that can be learned from the end of the 
Education Revitalization Council. 
 
SCHIEFFER