Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06USUNNEWYORK1620, UN ADMINISTRATION: PENSION BOARD APPROVES

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06USUNNEWYORK1620.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06USUNNEWYORK1620 2006-08-24 20:44 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED USUN New York
VZCZCXYZ0012
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #1620/01 2362044
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 242044Z AUG 06
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9964
INFO RUEHXX/GENEVA IO MISSIONS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 001620 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: AORC KUNR UNGA ASIG
SUBJECT: UN ADMINISTRATION:  PENSION BOARD APPROVES 
INVESTMENTS PLAN AND APPOINTS AN AUDIT COMMITTEE 
 
 
The following is a summary of the meeting of the Board of the 
UN Joint Staff Pension Fund, recently held in Nairobi.  It 
was prepared by Thomas Repasch, USUN Minister-Counselor who 
was appointed by the General Assembly to serve as an 
alternate member of the Board. 
 
1.  Summary.  At its meeting held in Nairobi July 13-21, the 
33-member Board of the UN Joint Staff Pension Fund considered 
several dozen reports on a range of topics, including: the 
Fund's actuarial valuation; management of the Fund's $32 
billion of investments; and the creation of an Audit 
Committee to improve governance. The meeting, chaired ably by 
Mr. Vladimir Yossifov, a Participant member of the ILO 
Pension Committee, was held on the beautifully landscaped UN 
Headquarters complex located in the hills overlooking the 
Kenyan capital.  In a departure from its usual practice of 
consensus decision making, Board members decided by a vote of 
17 to 11 (with one abstention) to approve the proposal made 
by the Secretary-General to manage the Fund's $8 billion in 
North American Equities in a passive way by outsourcing the 
portfolio, eliminating the need for the UN to maintain a 
staff of managers for these investments.  The two groups 
representing the UN Executive Heads and the Governing Bodies 
voted for the investments plan, while the third group of the 
tri-partite Board, representing the Participants, dismissed 
the plan as premature and risky.  Although the investment 
plan had full backing from the prestigious Investments 
Committee (chaired by William McDonough, former chairman of 
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York), some members 
criticized the presentations made by Under-Secretary-General 
for Management Chris Burnham and his chief of investments, 
Cheiko Okuda, as vague and not convincing. 
 
2.  In another move, the Board decided to use part of the 
Fund's 1.29 percent actuarial surplus to restore some 
benefits that were reduced several years ago when the Fund 
experienced financial difficulties.  It also rejected a 
working group recommendation to reduce the Board's membership 
to 21 but approved a measure to change the frequency of its 
meetings from every two years to annually in order to improve 
governance.  The Board rejected a proposal from the ILO and 
retirees to expand the use of the Emergency Fund but decided 
to keep another benefit proposal alive by directing the 
Fund's CEO to visit Ecuador to collect information about the 
plight of UN pensioners who claim they were disadvantaged 
when their country was "dollarized" several years ago.  As 
part of its consideration of the Fund's budget, the Board 
approved supplemental appropriations to:  bolster staff of 
the Investments Management Service; strengthen internal and 
external audit capabilities; provide for travel for members 
of the new Audit Committee; and upgrade positions in the 
Fund's information technology office.  At the same time it 
rejected requests for more office space and for consulting 
services to help in pursuing socially responsible investments. 
 
3.  The Pension Board's report, which has been sent 
electronically to the Department (IO/S; Podolsky and 
Glockner) will be issued as a UN document in the coming weeks 
in advance of its consideration by the Fifth Committee during 
this autumn's session.  The Board decided to meet on an 
annual basis and will meet next year in New York; it accepted 
an invitation from the International Fund for Agricultural 
Development (IFAD) to meet in Rome in 2008.  The following 
paragraphs provide details of the Board's deliberations on 
selected items.  Suggestions for the U.S. to consider in 
formulating its position on the Pension Board report are also 
included where applicable.  End summary. 
 
4.  Management of investments - This issue was by far the 
most contentious item, producing a rare vote by a body that 
works hard to produce consensus agreements.  The main issue 
was the Secretary-General's proposal to "outsource" the 
Fund's investments in North American Equities.  Although the 
Fund had experienced significant asset increases in recent 
years and had achieved actuarial surpluses, the 
Representative of the Secretary-General (Mr. Burnham) had 
stated in several briefings over the last several months that 
the Fund was "under-performing".  He also suggested that the 
UN should give its investment management business to 
consultants and advisors.  These remarks created concerns 
particularly among the Participants' Group, causing the 
Secretary-General to write to UN staff on July 11, telling 
 
SIPDIS 
them that there was "absolutely no plan or proposal for 
'privatizing' the Pension Fund or changing the system of 
benefits."  The controversy carried over to Nairobi, where 
the Fund's Investments Committee met just before Board's 
meeting and discussed the proposals.  The word circulating 
among some Board members was that the Investments Committee, 
headed by former NY Federal Reserve Chairman William 
McDonough, had a very heated exchange with Burnham about the 
performance of investments.  Rather than conclude that the 
Fund had been "under-performing", the Committee pronounced 
 
 
that the North American Equities portfolio had not kept pace 
with market indexes. 
 
Determining that it would be impossible for the UN's 
investment managers to try to beat the indexes of the world's 
"most efficient investment marketplace," the Investments 
Committee endorsed the plan to manage this portion of the 
Fund's investments in a passive way, hiring a firm to produce 
returns equal to the indexes.  While Burnham claimed that 
this approach would eventually save the Fund money, the 
proposal carried immediate financial implications of $2.9 
million to pay for transition services and the costs of 
indexed management. 
 
Despite efforts to allay the concerns of the Participants, 
the Group opposed the proposals from the very beginning of 
the meeting.  At one point they went so far as to propose 
that the responsibility for investments be taken away from 
the Secretary-General and given to the Chief Executive 
Officer of the Pension Fund.  One leader of the Participants 
Group said repeatedly that the outsourcing plan was risky and 
premature since the Board had not yet received the results of 
the Asset/Liability Management Study that it had approved 
previously.  Many members of the Board (including me) found 
it difficult to distinguish between among proposals to 
improve the management of the beleaguered Investment 
Management Service and those aimed at improving investment 
returns.  Although they have no formal role in the Board's 
decision-making, representatives of the retirees joined with 
the Participants in opposing most proposals. 
 
The drama heightened as the Board plowed through its hefty 
stack of reports and narrowed its focus to the investment 
management issues.  With no compromise in sight, the Board 
suspended its meeting and awaited the outcome of a "working 
group" commissioned to produce an agreement.  The working 
group met for several hours, producing a tentative agreement 
that would express concerns but would also approve the 
investments plan and most of the requested budget increases. 
(Comment: I was a member of this Group, representing the 
Governing Bodies group).  When the Participants' 
representatives took the compromise back to their Group, the 
proposal was rejected, setting the stage for a vote that the 
Participants knew they would lose.  The Participants remained 
defiant in their loss, as other Board members (including me) 
saw the vote as a referendum on the performance of 
Under-Secretary-General Burnham.  Some Board members who 
voted for the plan (including me) privately expressed 
disappointment at the style and approach used by Burnham; 
many also agreed that Burnham's Director of Investments, Ms. 
Cheiko Okuda, while hard-working, was not up to the task of 
managing the Fund's $30 billion-plus in investments. 
 
Comment: When the report is considered by the Fifth Committee 
this autumn, the U.S. might want to express concern about the 
Board's use of voting for this decision and seek information 
on progress made by the Secretariat in implementing the 
investments plan. 
 
5.  Actuarial Valuation - The Board was told by its actuaries 
that the Pension Fund had completed 2005 showing a surplus of 
1.29 percent.  This means that the value of the Fund was 1.29 
percent more than the amount needed to pay all of its 
promised benefits, based on the standard assumptions and 
actuarial models. The Board was informed that the surplus was 
primarily the result of gains from the continuing moderate 
levels of inflation and changes in the participant growth 
assumptions.  The surplus was slightly higher than the 1.14 
percent shown during the last valuation in 2003 and 
represented the fifth consecutive valuation that had resulted 
in a surplus. 
 
Because the Fund showed a surplus, there immediately ensued 
discussions on what to do with it.  Representatives of the 
Participants proposed to restore all the benefit reductions 
imposed in the 1990's when the Fund fell on hard times. 
Another proposal made by the ILO Pension Committee was to 
spend some of the money to expand the use of the Emergency 
Fund to help former UN staff members from the Soviet Union 
who were cheated out of benefits promised them by their 
former Communist governments.  Still another idea was to help 
retirees in Ecuador who were "economically disadvantaged" 
when their country dollarized its economy several years ago. 
The Board decided to spend about .32 percent of the surplus 
for partial restoration of reduction in the first consumer 
price index adjustment and elimination of the limitation on 
the right to restoration for existing and future contributing 
participants based on length of prior service.  With this 
decision, there will remain a small portion (.5 percent) of 
the consumer price index reduction still in place.  The 
General Assembly, in its resolution from 2004, pronounced 
that it would not consider approving any other benefit 
 
 
improvements until the reductions were fully restored. 
 
Comment: Even though the Board's decision on the surplus was 
a generally conservative one, the U.S. may still want to ask 
why the Board allowed the Fund to dip below the one percent 
surplus level (to .97 percent) considered prudent by most 
actuarial experts.  The U.S. might also want to oppose the 
Board's decision to send the Fund's Chief Executive Officer 
to Quito to find out more about the plight of the UN retirees 
in Ecuador. Such a trip would clearly be a waste of the 
Fund's resources since the General Assembly has already 
decided that it would not approve any benefit improvements 
until benefit reductions were fully restored. 
 
6.  Audit Committee - The Board decided to create an Audit 
Committee and approved Terms of Reference that provides for 
up to nine members, including two "outside experts", one 
member to represent retirees, and two members from each of 
the three groups that comprise the Board.  Using the criteria 
aimed at obtaining experts in audit, financial management, or 
compliance, the groups proposed and the Board appointed the 
following members for 4-year terms.  They Committee is 
expected to meet twice each year, once in New York and once 
in Geneva. 
 
Executive Heads:  K. Matsuura (UN-Geneva); G. Engida 
(UNESCO-Paris) 
Participants:  J.B. McGhie (IFAD-Rome); C. Santos Tejada 
(UNGeneva) 
Governing Bodies: J. LaRiviere (WHO-Geneva); T. Repasch 
(UN-New York) 
 
Comment: The U.S. may want to commend the Board for creating 
the Audit Committee and express hope that the Committee will 
be able to help the Board grapple with oversight, 
accountability, and governance questions.  At the same time, 
the U.S. might want to ask how the Board has assured itself 
that the Audit Committee members are indeed "experts" in the 
appropriate fields and find out, in particular, whether all 
Committee members have circulated their resumes among Board 
members. 
 
7.  Size and composition of the Pension Board - The Board 
rejected the preferred recommendation of its longstanding 
Working Group to reduce the size of the Board from 33 members 
to 21.  In doing so, the Board recognized that its decision 
did not respond to requests from the General Assembly to 
reallocate the seats on the Board in order to provide more 
equitable representation of the participating organizations. 
In particular, the General Assembly and the UN Secretariat 
have had long-term concerns that the UN, with up to 70 
percent of the participants and/or beneficiaries in the Fund, 
has only 36 percent of the members of the Board.  The 
21-member proposal would have increased the UN's 
representation to more than 40 percent. The Board did, 
however, adopt a number of other measures to improve its 
efficiency and (hopefully) improve the overall quality of 
governance.  Perhaps most importantly, the Board decided to 
meet annually beginning in 2007, thus reducing the role of 
the Board's 15-member Standing Committee, which had met in 
odd-numbered years to consider the Fund's proposed budget. 
Henceforth the Standing Committee will deal primarily with 
appeals cases.  While deciding to retain its tri-partite 
structure (Governing Bodies; Participants; Executive Heads), 
the Board agreed to pay the costs for two retiree 
representatives to attend the annual meetings.  It also 
approved a variety of measures aimed at making the Board's 
deliberations more efficient. 
 
Comment: The U.S. may want to ask why the Board was 
nonresponsive to the General Assembly's request for proposals 
that would result in more equitable distribution of the seats 
on the Board.  It could ask why the Board has spent several 
years and several hundred thousand dollars studying the 
issue, only to decide to maintain the status quo.  The U.S. 
might want to propose, during the Fifth Committee's 
deliberations, that the General Assembly approve the 
21-member option that was recommended by the Working Group 
but rejected by the Board. 
 
8.  Study of Personal Status for Pension Entitlements - What 
started out as a seemingly innocuous proposal by the Pension 
Fund Secretariat to collect information about the evolving 
issue of personal status in participating organizations grew 
into a lively and heated debate about same-sex marriages and 
domestic partnerships.  The Board was informed by the Fund's 
Chief Executive Officer (Bernard Cocheme) that there had been 
significant changes in national legislation in several 
countries and that some member organizations had been 
reviewing the personal status of staff members for the 
determination of entitlements under their staff rules and 
regulations.  Because such decisions had potential 
 
 
consequences for the Pension Fund, the Secretariat proposed 
that it collect data and study the issue.  Some Board Members 
expressed strong concerns about the Fund's engagement in such 
a sensitive and controversial issue, stating that the Fund 
had no business getting out in front of topics such as 
same-sex marriages.  After substantial discussion, the Board 
decided that employees' personal status for the purpose of 
entitlements was entirely up to the member organizations. 
The Board called on all member organizations to make sure 
that their staff members' personal status records "are 
maintained and verified on a fully current basis." 
 
Comment: The U.S. may want to remain silent on this item, 
thereby accepting without question the Board's decision, 
which is consistent with decisions of the UN Secretariat and 
the UN General Assembly. 
 
9.  Internal audit arrangements - The controversy over access 
to the Fund's internal audit reports provided a lively few 
hours of heated discussion, including a threat by the CEO to 
resign his post if the audit issue was not resolved 
satisfactorily.  Following a report from the OIOS auditors 
(via video from New York) who serve as the internal auditors 
for the Pension Fund, the CEO of the Fund expressed his 
concerns about the possible impact on the Fund of the General 
Assembly's decision in 2004 to allow member states' access to 
OIOS audit reports. Specifically, the CEO said he was opposed 
to this access provision because the Fund's internal auditors 
report to him and not to the General Assembly.  The 
temperature in the meeting room rose several degrees when I 
asked about the status of the recommendations contained in a 
recent OIOS investigation of allegations of conflict of 
interest related to Pension Fund procurement.  The CEO said 
he was "stunned" that a member state (in this case, the 
United States) had obtained access to a confidential 
investigation that was not yet completed.  He added that he 
would quit as CEO if such a practice continued.  While I 
responded that the report in question was not a draft and 
that the U.S. saw the access as critical for improved 
transparency, the CEO was successful in stirring up support 
for his alarmist position.  Some Board members (primarily 
those representing Participants) agreed with the CEO and 
recommended that the Fund replace OIOS with its own internal 
auditors.  After things calmed down a bit, the Board agreed 
that the Audit Committee should monitor the internal audit 
arrangements for the Fund as a matter of priority. 
 
Comment:  The U.S. may want to emphasize the importance of 
effective oversight of the large and growing UN Pension Fund 
and reiterate that the General Assembly has primary authority 
over budget and other issues related to the Fund.  In the 
interest of transparency, it was therefore appropriate that 
Member States have full and adequate access to audit and 
oversight information. 
 
10.  Possible new member organizations - The Board considered 
the applications of the International Organization for 
Migration (IOM) and the International Commission for the 
Conversation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) to become members of 
the Pension Fund.  It decided to recommend to the General 
Assembly that IOM be admitted but concluded that ICCAT did 
not meet the terms of membership because, among other things, 
the Commission's governing body had not authorized the 
Executive Secretary submit an application or to make the 
required changes to its own staff regulations and salary 
scales. 
 
Comment:  The U.S. may want to express satisfaction with the 
Board's decision on IOM and signal its readiness to approve 
IOM membership in the Pension Board.  It may also want to 
highlight the importance for other potential members to 
strictly follow the rules that apply to those considering 
membership. 
 
11.  Note:  As a member of the UN Local Pension Committee in 
New York elected by the General Assembly, I attended the 
meeting and participated fully in the discussions.  I took a 
strong interest in the issue of the size and composition of 
the Board, having served on the Working Group that 
recommended a reduction in the Board's membership (to 21).  I 
also intervened frequently in discussions of the Fund's audit 
arrangements and the decision to create an Audit Committee. 
I was subsequently appointed to a three-year term as a member 
of the new Committee.  Being less senior than other 
representatives of the General Assembly on the Board, 
however, I was designated an "alternate" member and therefore 
was not authorized to vote. 
BOLTON