Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05PARIS5195, USUNESCO: NEGOTIATIONS ON BIOETHICS DECLARATION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05PARIS5195.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05PARIS5195 2005-07-27 17:48 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Paris
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PARIS 005195 
 
SIPDIS 
 
FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS 
 
STATE PASS HHS - BILL STEIGER 
STATE PASS OSTP - GENE WHITNEY 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: TBIO UNESCO KSCI HHS
SUBJECT:  USUNESCO:  NEGOTIATIONS ON BIOETHICS DECLARATION 
 
1.  SUMMARY. The second and final session of the 
Intergovernmental Meeting of Experts met June 20-24 at 
UNESCO and reached consensus on a draft "Universal 
Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights."  The US was 
successful in adding to the draft Declaration a statement 
that one of the aims of the Declaration is ensuring respect 
for the life of human beings and in deflecting efforts to 
have the document include "right to health," "special 
responsibility of human beings for the protection of the 
environment," and various other social agendas as bioethical 
principles.  The United States received appreciation for its 
proposal concerning the "social responsibility" article, and 
this was instrumental in helping the US successfully oppose 
objectionable provisions.   The draft declaration will be 
sent forward to the UNESCO General Conference in October 
2005 for consideration and likely adoption. The negotiations 
were challenging but were generally conducted with respect. 
However, the process was deficient in several respects, 
resulting, inter alia, in insufficient time for governments 
to review and comment on the final revised text and meeting 
report.    END OF SUMMARY 
 
BACKGROUND 
 
2.  The first session of the Intergovernmental Meeting of 
Experts Aimed at Finalizing a Draft Declaration on Universal 
Norms on Bioethics was held April 4-6, 2005.  It considered 
the Preliminary Draft Declaration prepared by the 
independent International Bioethics Committee (IBC).  The 
April session demonstrated widespread dissatisfaction by 
member countries with the IBC draft, but no consensus on the 
major issues, including the scope of the Declaration. 
Following this meeting, an informal discussion was convened 
by Ambassador Pablo Sader (from Uruguay), Chairman of the 
Meeting.  Sader attempted to find compromise on the basis of 
that discussion and other consultations. 
 
RESPECT FOR HUMAN LIFE 
 
3.  The Second Session of the Intergovernmental Meeting was 
held at UNESCO headquarters, June 20-24, 2005.  At that 
meeting, the U.S. was successful in adding to the article on 
Aims (Article 2(iii) of the draft Declaration) a provision 
on respect for the life of human beings.  Any reference to 
respect for the life of human beings had been vigorously 
opposed by a number of states in the previous meeting.  The 
draft Declaration now states that one of its aims is "to 
promote respect for human dignity and protect human rights, 
by ensuring respect for the life of human beings.."  The 
Declaration recognizes human life (or respect for it) as a 
part of human rights and thus incorporates it into the 
various provisions of the Declaration in which  the term 
"human rights" is used. The ability to obtain consensus for 
this provision was facilitated by inclusion at the urging of 
the U.S. of language in the preamble that the Declaration is 
to be understood consistent with domestic and international 
law (see paragraph 6). 
 
SCOPE 
 
4. The U.S. delegation was successful in limiting the 
explicit scope of the draft Declaration to medicine and the 
life sciences; the definition of bioethics in the IBC draft 
that had included the social sciences and relationship to 
the biosphere was deleted.  In addition, the U.S. was 
successful in limiting the explicit application of the draft 
Declaration to States to guide them in the formulation of 
their legislation, policies, or other instruments in the 
field of bioethics, with a reference to its also providing 
guidance to decisions or practices of private actors. 
(However, some of the actual provisions appear to be 
relevant only to private actors.) 
 
DOMESTIC LAW 
 
5.  The U.S. insisted on a provision (in the Preamble, and 
accepted with revisions in a similar provision in Article 
27) that the draft Declaration is to be understood in a 
manner consistent with domestic and international law; some 
articles also contain a provision referring to domestic law. 
(The French delegation attempted to delete the preambular 
provision at the last moment, even though, as the Chairman 
stated, the consensus that had been reached on other items 
was made possible by the understanding that the preamble 
would contain this provision.)   The U.S. successfully 
opposed inclusion of an explicit savings clause, pursuant to 
our policy for negotiating declarations. 
 
CONSENT 
 
6.  The meeting had difficulty drafting the provisions on 
informed consent (now Articles 6 and 7).  A large informal 
working group presented language to the plenary meeting for 
discussion.  The Chairman gaveled it as agreed to after only 
brief discussion.   Several countries objected strongly to 
the approval without meaningful discussion.  Canada in 
particular objected to the fact that there was only minimal 
discussion and expressed formal reservations on the 
articles.  The U.S. supported the Canadian objection. 
Article 6 contains a new paragraph (c), which had not 
previously been tabled, providing that in addition to 
obtaining the consent of individuals for research, 
researchers "may" obtain the "additional agreement of the 
legal representatives of the group or community concerned." 
(Comment: It is uncertain whether this has the potential to 
create additional expense and delay for research without 
benefit for the patient. End Comment) 
 
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND HEALTH 
 
7.  Brazil proposed an amendment to the already problematic 
Article 13 in the IBC Preliminary Draft (now Article 14 in 
the Draft Declaration).  Its amendment received broad 
support in the meeting (particularly from Andean countries). 
Its amendment made promotion of health and social 
development a "duty" of governments.  It also drew from the 
WHO Constitution and referred to the enjoyment of the 
highest attainable standard of health as one of the 
fundamental rights of every human being.  The U.S. countered 
with language referring to health and social development 
"for their people" as a "central purpose" of governments and 
restored the language from the WHO constitution left out of 
the Brazilian amendment  (highest attainable standard of 
health is a fundamental right "without distinction of race, 
religion, political belief, economic or social condition"). 
The U.S. language also deleted the reference to 
"reproductive health."  The U.S. compromise was adopted, and 
the U.S. was thanked for its constructive contribution and 
its cooperation. This increased support for the U.S. 
position on other items of concern to the U.S. 
 
ENVIRONMENT 
 
8.  The U.S. was successful in changing a provision that 
would have made it a principle of bioethics that any 
decision or practice should take due regard of its effect on 
all forms of life and that there was a "special 
responsibility" of human beings for the protection of the 
environment.  The agreed language (Article 17) deletes the 
reference to "special responsibility" and says that "due 
regard" is to be given to the interconnection between humans 
and other forms of life, to the importance of appropriate 
access and utilization of biological and genetic resources, 
to the respect for traditional knowledge and to the "role" 
of human beings in the protection of the environment.  The 
U.S. was also successful in opposing addition (in Article 
21) of references to "biopiracy" proposed by Brazil and 
supported by the Andean states. 
 
PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE 
 
9.  The Preliminary Draft contained a muddled and 
potentially troublesome version of the precautionary 
principle.  The U.S. was successful in substituting for it a 
provision (Article 20) saying that  "appropriate assessment 
and adequate management of risk" should be promoted. 
 
DECLARATION NOT CONVENTION 
 
10.  The U.S. was successful in changing the tone and words 
of the Declaration in several ways to make it consistent 
with the fact it is a declaration, not a binding instrument: 
the word "shall" was replaced in each instance by "is (are) 
to be" or "should"; the concept of "implementation" was 
removed; the provision for reports to UNESCO by states was 
deleted; the roles envisaged for  the IBC and IGBC (the 
Intergovernmental Bioethics Committee) were reduced 
considerably, and UNESCO was directed to promote cooperation 
between them; and the reference to future instruments was 
deleted. 
 
PROCESS 
 
11. UNESCO seemed to be focused more on having a product for 
the General Conference than on the quality of that product. 
The overall process for developing the Declaration was not 
satisfactory.  The amount of de facto control given to the 
IBC (a group of independent "experts") was particularly 
troublesome.  The IBC was directed to prepare a recommended 
draft.  It met 6 times over an 18-month period.  Member 
states had only limited input through the IGBC, and the 
suggestions made by the IGBC were not reflected in the IBC's 
Preliminary Draft.  The IBC asked for more time to develop a 
draft but was pressured into finalizing its draft.  This was 
presented to Member States as a consensus draft when in fact 
there were major disagreements among the members of the IBC 
itself and there was no consensus among Member States. The 
IBC prided itself on expanding the notion of bioethics to 
include protection of the environment and social 
responsibility and its "independence" from governments. 
The resulting Preliminary Draft presented by the IBC was not 
acceptable to Member States.  They were presented with an 
unacceptable text that they had to fix, and to do it in only 
two sessions of the intergovernmental meeting, in which 90 
states participated. 
 
12. In addition, pressure from the Secretariat to have the 
document ready for this fall's General Conference meant 
there was not time for full consideration and good drafting. 
And there was little opportunity for any reflection or 
consultation with capitals about the language being drafted. 
The draft Declaration in fact was adopted after midnight as 
the translators were leaving without a chance for full 
consideration; there was no debate on the consent article. 
In addition, there was no opportunity to read or consider 
the report accompanying the draft.   It was an uphill battle 
against a draft prepared in secret, by a small, 
nonrepresentative, and supposedly expert group who had been 
given no guidance by the Member States.  The process was 
essentially upside down. 
 
COMMENT 
 
13.  The U.S. was successful in blunting some of the most 
troublesome aspects of the Preliminary Draft presented by 
the IBC and of amendments that member states sought to make 
in the Intergovernmental Meeting. It succeeded in obtaining 
a reference to respect for human life.  The result was 
better than could have been expected, particularly 
considering the poor process.  There will be more 
discussions about the terms of the Declaration, and we will 
monitor efforts to change it.  At the same time we await 
reactions as to whether there are provisions that would 
prevent the U.S. from joining consensus.  We also will be 
vigilant to any efforts to turn the Declaration into a 
Convention and make clear our opposition to any such effort. 
 
OLIVER