Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05WELLINGTON496, NEW ZEALAND RESPONSE ON UN REFORM

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05WELLINGTON496.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05WELLINGTON496 2005-06-27 04:48 2011-08-30 01:44 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Wellington
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 WELLINGTON 000496 
 
SIPDIS 
 
FOR EAP/ANZ 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/26/2015 
TAGS: PHUM PREL PGOV KUNR AORC NZ UNSC UNCHR
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND RESPONSE ON UN REFORM 
 
REF: A. SECSTATE 111637 
 
     B. SECSTATE 111657 
     C. SECSTATE 114435 
 
Classified By: ACTING DCM KATHERINE HADDA, 
FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D) 
 
1.  (SBU) On June 21, Charge delivered ref A, B and C 
demarche points to Wen Chin Powles and Valerie Meyer, both 
Deputy Directors at the United Nations, Human Rights and 
Commonwealth Division (UNHC) of the Ministry of Foreign 
Affairs and Trade (MFAT).  Powles and Meyer said that the 
GoNZ's positions on reform of the UN and the Commission on 
Human Rights are largely synchronized with the U.S. positions 
though the U.S. is further along in fleshing out its 
positions.  MFAT also subsequently sent a copy of its recent 
statement to the June 21 Informal Meeting in advance of the 
General Assembly September High-level plenary.  The text of 
the statement is attached at para 8. 
 
New Zealand aims generally support U.S. interests 
--------------------------------------------- ---- 
2.    (SBU) According to Powles and Meyer, the GoNZ generally 
supports our UN reform interests including those of the 
Peacebuilding Commission, the responsibility to protect 
(where New Zealand will push for the strongest possible 
language including the override of sovereignty in cases of 
genocide, ethnic cleansing and similar), counterterrorism, 
developmental reform, and secretariat reform.  New Zealand 
seeks strengthening of disarmament and nonproliferation 
provisions. 
 
3.    (C) On Security Council reform, New Zealand will oppose 
any expansion of the veto power, in keeping with New 
Zealand's consistant stance against UNSC vetoes since the UN 
was founded.  And while supportive of a Japanese role on the 
Security Council, New Zealand is "not certain about a 
permanent seat for Japan," said Powles.  Viewing that 
Security Council reform is overwhelming the U.N., Powles 
commented that New Zealand "doesn't want (reform) to be 
polarizing and dominating."  New Zealand has been asked about 
its position on Security Council reform by the governments of 
Brazil, China, Germany, India, Japan, Mexico and South Korea, 
she added. 
 
But there are some areas of difference 
-------------------------------------- 
4.    (C) Regarding the proposed Human Rights Council, the 
GoNZ shares the USG view that a smaller body is needed for 
greater effectiveness, and in fact sees a still smaller 
membership than the 20 members we proposed, Meyer said.  She 
acknowledged, however, that few countries share this desire 
for a still smaller membership.  GoNZ shares our concerns 
that a peer review process might bog the Council down to the 
detriment of its primary mission.  However, Myer implied that 
the GoNZ is open to the notion of peer review, even as it 
would need to see more discussion on the idea.  The GoNZ 
seeks more equal status of the Council vis-a-vis the Security 
Council and ECOSOC, and sees the Council as a "principal 
organ of the United Nations" consistent with the "Three 
Pillar" arrangement promoted by the Secretary General. 
However, while indicating that the Council should have the 
authority to investigate, censure and make recommendations, 
Meyer said that sanctions and other enforcement mechanisms 
should come from UNSC. 
Meyer further said that the GoNZ is "supportive of keeping 
the good things of the HRC, including the role of NGOs." 
Finally, Meyer indicated New Zealand's supports a regular 
source of budget funding as opposed to a system dependent on 
voluntary contributions. 
 
5.    (SBU) On the Peace Building Commission (PBC), Powles 
reported general consensus; however she noted possible 
differences on how the PBC would fit into the UN framework 
and it membership characteristics.  She did acknowledge that 
these differences might result more from a lack of detail on 
the PBC rather than on our diverging views.  New Zealand 
favors early establishment of a Peace Building Commission, 
with Powles suggesting that NZ has a more ambitious timeline 
than the U.S. 
 
6.    (SBU) Climate change will continue to be a focus area 
for New Zealand during the UN reform initiative.  As 
indicated by Powles, the GoNZ used a June 21st statement to 
an informal meeting plenary to promote a strong position on 
climate change, one which supports the UN Secretary's General 
position.  However, as she had indicated, their statement 
(para 8) did not provide much detail. 
 
7.    (SBU) After the recent failure of the May 
Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference to reach 
consensus, New Zealand is looking to see disarmament and 
non-proliferation language strengthened, Powles said. 
However, similar to climate change, their statement (para 8) 
did not provide much detail. 
 
Text of New Zealand's Statement 
------------------------------- 
8.  (U) Begin Text:  Mr President 
The High Level Event in September will be a unique 
opportunity to reinvigorate the United Nations.  Member 
States have a wide range of national, regional and 
international interests.  But we believe that we all share a 
fundamental interest in ensuring that the United Nations is 
able effectively to meet the challenges of the twenty-first 
century. 
 
When our Leaders gather here in less than three months time 
they will want to take decisions that will substantially 
strengthen the UN.  The draft contains many sound 
recommendations and we thank you for your careful work in 
drawing it together.  We see it as a solid platform and we 
welcome the positive momentum it is generating.  There are, 
however, several areas of priority importance to New Zealand 
where we would like to suggest bolder language, more 
definition of concepts and clearer signposts to follow up 
action. 
 
Mr President 
 
We agree that development is a central goal in itself - as 
well as vital for achieving collective security.  We are 
pleased to see that the draft is imbued with the "Spirit of 
Monterrey", underlining the need to mobilise all resources 
for development including aid, trade and domestic resources. 
New Zealand supports the positive references to the need to 
progress the Doha Development Round. 
 
Along with increasing volumes of aid, it is important to 
ensure that aid delivery is effective from developing 
countries' points of view:  New Zealand strongly supports the 
emphasis on aid effectiveness present in the document. 
 
The draft outcome document rightly emphasises the importance 
of dealing with climate change.  A constructive international 
dialogue is urgently needed on how to take meaningful action 
on climate change, and at the same time provide for future 
economic growth and development aspirations.  As the 
Secretary-General has said, we must develop a more inclusive 
 
SIPDIS 
international framework beyond 2012.  Anything less than 
broad and balanced participation and action, in particular by 
all of the world's major emitters, including both developed 
and developing countries, will be inadequate to deal with a 
challenge of this magnitude. 
 
We are particularly pleased to see that the draft outcome 
document recognises the plight of countries in special 
situations, particularly small island developing states.  We 
hope that the Summit will add impetus for the implementation 
of the Mauritius Strategy for SIDS. 
 
We can support many of the elements of the draft outcome 
document on disarmament and non-proliferation but would like 
to see a number of them strengthened to better address the 
security challenges in today's world.  Our strong wish is for 
our leaders to agree on concrete steps towards elimination of 
weapons of mass destruction, as well as measures to prevent 
their proliferation.  The 2000 NPT outcome identified steps 
that should be taken towards achieving nuclear disarmament. 
Against that background we cannot support the implication 
that progress on nuclear disarmament might be held hostage to 
"general and complete disarmament", as suggested by the 
current draft text. 
 
New Zealand welcomes the proposals to strengthen the United 
Nations' human rights machinery, but in our view they do not 
go far enough to establish the protection and promotion of 
human rights.  It remains our view that the proposed Human 
Rights Council should be a principal organ of the UN.  This 
would reflect the primacy of human rights in the Charter and 
give the new body maximum authority in responding to emerging 
or critical human rights situations.  The Council should be a 
smaller body than the current Commission on Human Rights in 
order to expedite decision-making and facilitate consensus on 
action.  We are concerned by the omission from the current 
draft of the Secretary-General's stricture that those elected 
to the Council should undertake to abide by the highest human 
rights standards. 
 
We would also want the outcome document to provide more 
clarity on the functions, mandate and powers of the Council, 
and its functional relationship with other organs of the UN 
system.  The Council should be able to investigate, censure 
and make recommendations on further action to the Security 
Council and the proposed Peacebuilding Commission.  The 
Council's relationship with the General Assembly's Third 
Committee needs to be clarified in order to avoid overlapping 
functions and mandates.  We are interested in the proposed 
peer review mechanism but would like to see further developed 
how it would work in practice. 
 
Strengthening the Office of the High Commissioner for Human 
Rights and providing it with the requisite funds from the 
regular budget of the UN must be a priority.  We would also 
like to see a more explicit reaffirmation in the outcome 
document of the policy of mainstreaming human rights 
throughout the UN system and an enhanced role for the High 
Commissioner in relation to the Security Council and the 
proposed Peacebuilding Commission. 
 
Mr President 
 
We are pleased that the proposal for the Peacebuilding 
Commission has broad and increasing support.  New Zealand 
fully supports the role and mandate of the PBC as broadly 
described in the current draft.  It reflects well what is 
required to fill the institutional gap.  However, we believe 
the draft can and should go further.   It is within our reach 
to agree on the structure of the PBC so that Leaders can 
formally establish it in September. 
 
On details, we would make three points.  First, on size, we 
believe the optimal number for core membership would be no 
more than 20, with balanced participation from both the 
Security Council and ECOSOC (say, five from each) plus 
representation by key donors, Troop Contributing Countries, 
regional partners and International Financial Institutions on 
the basis proposed in the Secretary-General's explanatory 
note.  We also support the Secretary-General's recommendation 
that national authorities and relevant regional actors should 
be involved in the Peacebuilding Commission's 
country-specific sub-groups and would like to see this 
reflected in the outcome document. 
 
Second, on mandate, we fully support the proposal that Member 
States should be able to apply to the PBC and the Standing 
Fund for assistance in reducing the risk of either new or 
recurring conflict. 
 
Thirdly, given the advisory nature of the PBC, we query the 
need for sequential reporting.  In our view, the strength of 
the PBC should be its ability to coordinate and provide 
transition.  To do this, it should have the flexibility to 
report to either the Security Council or ECOSOC, and to the 
GA and the HR Council according to need. 
 
We support the establishment of a Standing Fund allowing UN 
agencies to fill the funding gap immediately after conflict 
ends and before bilateral assistance arrives.  We also fully 
support the Secretary-General's proposal to establish a small 
Peacebuilding Support Office. 
 
As the Secretary-General says, terrorism is a threat to all 
that the United Nations stands for.  We support his proposal 
to implement a UN counter-terrorism strategy.  This strategy 
must be comprehensive, taking into account the underlying 
factors which fuel and generate support for terrorism.  We 
support the call to conclude a comprehensive convention on 
terrorism during the 60th session of the GA. 
 
Mr President 
 
We welcome the draft language on responsibility to protect. 
We agree that the primary responsibility to protect civilians 
lies with individual Member States.  However, where States 
are unable or unwilling to protect their population from 
genocide, large scale violations of international 
humanitarian law or ethnic cleansing, we believe strongly 
that the international community has the responsibility to 
take collective action.  We would emphasise that this 
responsibility is about protecting civilians within the 
parameters of international law, and specifically within the 
provisions of the UN Charter. 
 
We look forward to Leaders in September fully embracing the 
responsibility to protect and would support language in the 
Leaders' declaration making clear the elements comprising the 
responsibility to protect. 
 
Mr President 
 
For a fully effective Secretariat we must urgently strengthen 
the Secretary-General's ability to manage resources flexibly, 
and ensure that the Organisation can attract the highest 
calibre of staff.  We are pleased to see the management 
reform measures that are being put in place.  Leaders should 
agree to provide the Secretary-General with the necessary 
flexibility and authority to carry out his responsibilities, 
whilst requiring a full system of accountability, integrity 
and transparency. 
 
We fully endorse the urgent need to review mandates that are 
older than five years and identify resources for shifting to 
other priorities.  We should not shy away from the 
possibility that some activities have outlived their 
usefulness, or could be delivered in a different way. 
 
There is scope for this part of the draft to map out a 
clearer agenda for ongoing updating of mandates, and of 
management practices, and to better distinguish between 
action that is already under way and what now needs to 
happen.  Without repeating them, I would nevertheless like to 
associate New Zealand with the points on management reform 
made by Australia, Canada, Switzerland and the United 
Kingdom.  I also echo the point just made by Norway on the 
need for progress on gender balance in the UN system. 
 
Mr President 
 
We strongly support the draft language on concluding 
negotiations on a protocol expanding legal protection for UN 
and associated personnel during UNGA60.  Attacks against 
personnel continue and New Zealand looks forward to early 
agreement on this issue.  Discussions on the scope of the 
Protocol have brought us to a point where conclusion of a new 
legal instrument, which materially broadens the Protocol, is 
within reach. 
 
Finally Mr President 
 
New Zealand has been a loyal advocate and supporter of the 
United Nations since 1945.  We sincerely want to see the 
organisation emerge in better shape from the current 
initiative.  We are ready and willing to play our part in the 
work that still lies ahead.  End Text 
Swindells